Paradigm GP @danrobinson explains the 99% automation paradox, where eliminating almost all of someone’s tasks can still leave their job intact: "You could imagine that 99% of someone's job gets automated. You might imagine that means we have demand for only 1% of their time. But in fact, that 1% of their job basically becomes their entire job." "We've seen this with software engineering. We don't really see humans being 100% replaced. 99% of the work they did was automated, and now they're spending all of their time doing the other 1%." "Output has gone up by some decent amount, but the labor share of output is still actually relatively constant." "Chad Jones, who recently joined Anthropic, and Chris Tonetti at Stanford, which sort of covers this. So I've been working on a game that might explore that concept." @paradigm