Maybe itās not really just about protecting immigrants or muslims.
When you look at why the left stayed quiet or made excuses for the Pakistani grooming gangs in the UK for years, a different question comes up.
What if parts of the left simply donāt see pedophilia as a dealbreaker the way normal people do?
In academia and activist circles, the push to reframe pedophiles as āminor-attracted persons,ā an oppressed sexual minority that deserves affirmation instead of judgment, has become normalized in certain journals and organizations.
A 2024 review found dozens of peer reviewed papers since 2015 promoting anti-stigma campaigns to make the public more accepting.
B4U-ACT has spent years training therapists to treat minor attraction as a valid part of someoneās identity and continued hosting events promoting that view into 2025 and 2026.
In 2024, Democratic Kentucky State Senator Karen Berg suggested on the floor that pedophiles should be given child sex dolls as a harm reduction measure.
Even when Democrats controlled the White House under Biden, serious high level accountability on the Epstein network was slow and selective. Real pressure only intensified once it became useful against Trump. The victims waited.
And just this year, the youth wing of the Dutch social liberal governing party argued that pedophilia is a born sexual orientation that should be taught in schools and that virtual child pornography might actually reduce real world abuse.
This isnāt some old scandal from decades ago. These patterns are active right now.
They wrap it all in therapyspeak and public health framing. But the direction stays the same.
Pedophilia is not a āsexual orientation.ā Itās sexual attraction to children who cannot consent. Framing it as just another preference we must accept is a deliberate attempt to normalize predation.
The roots are French, of course. The Marquis de Sade turned the total rejection of moral law into a philosophy. His works treat the rape, torture, and murder of children as the ultimate expression of radical freedom.
That spirit then resurfaced in the post-1968 sexual liberation movement. In 1977, leading French intellectuals, Sartre, Beauvoir, Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze and others, signed petitions demanding the decriminalization of sex between adults and children under 15.
One declared: āthree years in prison for caresses and kisses? That is enough.ā
They claimed children have a sexual life and the capacity to consent.
Their idea of āliberationā is a rejection of morality itself and its constraints on liberty, in servitude of the limitless natural desires of perverted adults.
It has absolutely nothing to do with the American understanding of liberty rooted in natural rights. From Locke to the Founders, liberty is ordered freedom under law that protects the vulnerable, especially those who lack the capacity to consent.
It is not license for the strong to prey on the weak.
The French model dissolves moral order into appetite and power while the American model recognizes natural boundaries that preserve civilization.
One defends children. The other sacrifices them.
The Left have made their choice.