a week ago I bought a 1:1 @Quotrons404 NFT for $10k, and people thought I was insane now it’s generating roughly $4,400/day in fee distributions the first $10k earned back took about 7.5 days. the second $10k earned back took only 2.25 days. as $Quotron volume and ecosystem utilization ramps up, distributions (payments to nft's) scale directly. We've seen significant but subtle support by other big market players already on twitter and elsewhere, but my inclination is this will grow significantly. There is a very real universe where this single terminal recoups its original purchase price every 24 hours in the not too distant future - perhaps as soon as a week or two. but in my opinion the actual asymmetry right now is with the floor NFT's, not just the 1:1's. The cheapest Quotrons NFTs are wildly mispriced relative to their cash flow imo. if we assume no growth whatsoever after today with the project, this is the math: floor price: ~$5,000 daily payout: ~$16/d ($5,840/y) APR: ~117% (0.85x P/E ratio) time to pay back: 10 months typically in defi standard real-yield assets on high-beta platforms (like quotrons) trade around 15%–35% APR. At current static volume alone - that is, without any growth at all - the floor is fundamentally undervalued by 3x–4x and the floor NFTs should trade closer to $15k–$20k just on yield parity but what if the growth continues? as I said earlier, we can see from various tweets and connections that the growth of this project is unlikely to stay static - and given that fee distributions scale 1:1 with volume, neither should the value of the NFTs. If Quotrons continues the trajectory seen over the last week and a half, we get these numbers for fair future value quite soon: 10x vol = $160/d per floor nft ARR = $58,400/y time to pay back = 31 days each nft at the floor right now could, with conditions that do not seem absurd at all to me right now, end up generating $58k+/year, in other words we're entering into an expanding cycle in crypto it seems, so the reality is that these numbers I'm posting could be dwarfed by reality. there could also be a black swan that makes growth stop entirely. but although I currently own a number of quotron nfts and tokens, I'm looking myself to expand my collection, with the expectation of a meaningful multiple on that investment - similar to what I got a week and a half ago when people thought I was ridiculous for paying $10k in the first place. dyor as always, and good luck

Two men are dead. Four others were drugged and survived. And what is everyone talking about? Her face. A case in South Korea has been getting a lot of attention. Kim So-young, 20, is accused of spiking men's drinks with benzodiazepines, drugs she had been prescribed for herself. Two men died in Seoul motels. Four others survived. On August 18, prosecutors asked for the death penalty. But online, people keep saying she is pretty. That they would have accepted a drink from her too. That is the least important part of this case. The timeline is what bothers me. December 14. Her own boyfriend drinks something she hands him in a parking lot, collapses twenty minutes later, and spends two days unconscious. He reports her to police. January 29. A man is found dead in a motel in northern Seoul. Security cameras catch a woman leaving. February 6. Police identify her, run her name through the system, and find the December complaint. Same woman. February 9. The forensic lab confirms the dead man had the same family of drugs in his body. That same night, another man walks into a motel with her. He is found dead the next day. She is arrested that evening. Police say they did not have enough evidence to arrest her sooner, and legally that may be true. You cannot arrest someone for looking suspicious. But the family of that last victim keeps asking the obvious question. He died three days after police already knew her name. Prosecutors also say she had asked ChatGPT about overdosing on sleeping pills, and that after the first man survived, the doses got bigger. She says she only wanted to make the men sleep. That she never meant to kill anyone. This whole thing gave me a strange sense of deja vu. When I was younger, the Kijima Kanae case was on Japanese TV constantly. She met men on marriage sites, sedated them with sleeping pills, and staged their deaths to look like suicide. Three died. She is on death row now. And I remember the talk shows barely discussed the victims. It was all about her looks. In her case the question was the opposite, "she is not even pretty, so why did men trust her," but the camera was pointed at the same wrong place. Korea is doing the same thing right now, just in reverse. Here is why the timing matters: the verdict comes down this afternoon. Whatever it is, I keep thinking about one question. When police have a survivor, a complaint, a body and one name connecting them all, what is supposed to happen in those three days? I honestly do not have a good answer. If you do, tell me. Two men are dead. They are the ones this story should be about.