Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

WangNextDoor
@WangNextDoor2
Engineer/entrepreneur in CA, Tesla/NVDA/AI & Robotics bull. Elon & All-In Podcast enthusiast. Believer in a universal high-income future.
16.6K Following    104.7K Followers
Morgan Stanley提出特斯拉要重新获得投资者信心,核心在于证明Robotaxi正在真正规模化落地。关键指标包括更多车辆实际上路、城市运营密度持续提升、无监督里程稳步增长、单位经济明显改善,以及人形机器人项目的实质进展。FSD选装率已达到55%,远超此前预期,显示出用户对自动驾驶能力的认可度在快速上升。 产线端已出现带专用标识的无方向盘版本,并首次集成卫星通信模块,后排高清直播、娱乐与办公的潜力清晰可见。当前整体节奏偏慢,并非故意压制估值,而是远程干预次数仍偏高、配套服务与清洁设施尚未完全就绪等实际运营瓶颈所致。 我一直强调Tesla财报会议没有对外公布运营问题(瓶颈)的实际进展,个人猜想目前远程服务人员对于无监督车辆的数量比例尚未达到Elon的需求设想(小1:100?),如果过高对于一个将要往10几万台车甚至百万台Robotaxi fleet数量规划的公司来说,人力成本完全不make sense. 对比来看,Waymo人车比约在1:40左右,特斯拉则正处于持续优化这一比例的过程中。这是一个连续改善的轨迹,而非突然开关式成功。一旦人车比提升到足够高的水平,部署速度将进入指数扩张阶段。 与此同时,人形机器人已从早期演示转向真实量产准备与大规模训练,相关制造岗位持续扩充,基础设施投入也在加大。 整体证据正在逐项对齐:技术、产能、运营与资本层面均有积极信号,机构资金已在流入,市场情绪却仍偏谨慎。我的判断是,执行正按计划推进,规模化只是时间问题,而非停滞或倒退。持有者只需持续跟踪这些核心指标的变化即可。
Show more
🚨 JUST IN: Bad*ss footage has emerged of Twin Fills, Idaho shooting hero Jordan Salinas — training his entire life up to the moment HE SAVED LIVES in a FEARLESS show of courage THAT IS AN AMERICAN WHO LOVES THE 2ND AMENDMENT 🔥 Give him a high civilian honor! 🇺🇸
Show more
0
850
49.7K
5.5K
Forward to community
Apple Glasses并非要取代iPhone,而是充当AI的“第一视角感官”,通过摄像头捕捉环境信息,让Siri能“看见”你眼前的世界,实现从点餐识菜到会议记录的无缝辅助。它深度绑定iPhone作为算力中枢,主打“无屏化”交互,将导航、通话等功能完全语音化,是AirPods式的感官延伸而非独立终端。在预售价6999元的高端定位下,苹果特别强化了隐私设计,通过端侧处理、物理提示灯等机制规避Meta眼镜的偷拍争议,意在打造下一代随身计算入口。
Show more
Jim 肥伦 isn't too wrong here 😂
Maybe just a warm-up foreplay for the upcoming Midterm politics by the WSJ 😂
Hey @grok, I see Elon dismissed this report by WSJ as Fake News, is it true? 👀
Maybe open up a Giga Korea and Giga Japan?The supply chains have to be rebuilt 4sure but that's life, always filled with tough calls...
Tesla Weighs Sale of China Business to Pave Way for Potential SpaceX Merger -- WSJ China. By Becky Peterson and Raffaele Huang (Wall Street Journal) -- Elon Musk designed Tesla's China business to be easily separated from its U.S. business because of geopolitical tensions. It might also come in handy if he proceeds with a SpaceX merger. Musk in recent years instructed Tesla executives to organize the company with a "laser" between its U.S. and China businesses, according to people familiar with the planning. He wanted to ensure that in the event of geopolitical strife between the two countries, at least the U.S. half of Tesla would survive. Now, some Tesla executives have been told to prepare for a separation of the China business ahead of a potential merger, a person familiar with those talks said. And Tesla advisers have discussed possible options for a separation, including a spinoff, sale or closure, another person said. Any of those moves could have a profound impact on Tesla, whose Chinese operation transformed it into a consistently profitable global mass-market electric vehicle leader -- and potentially impact its valuation if a SpaceX merger were to happen. It is unclear how quickly Tesla could spin out or sell the China business, and it is possible that its plans could change. Musk, who is chief executive of both Tesla and SpaceX, has talked up the crossover potential between both companies in recent months as he reorganizes them around artificial-intelligence projects. Investors and analysts have embraced the idea of a merger following a record-setting IPO for SpaceX, which raised $86 billion for the company in June. "Obviously we can't talk about, you know, combining companies and that kind of thing on earnings calls," Musk told investors last week. "It is got to be done with the appropriate process." Musk was particularly concerned about Tesla's dependence on China for battery cells and feared its access to semiconductors could be jeopardized if Beijing invaded Taiwan, the people familiar with the planning said. The goal was to be ready for 2026 or 2027 in anticipation of a war, they said. Separating Tesla's China operations -- including an electric-vehicle factory there -- would address potential conflicts arising from SpaceX's work as a major U.S. defense contractor. Such a deal would aim to create a firewall between Tesla's Chinese subsidiary and its U.S. business. SpaceX faces significant restrictions due to its dealings with the U.S. government. The company is a major national-security defense contractor, with business lines that include launching top-secret satellites and operating internet services in war zones like Ukraine. Sales to the U.S. government made up 20.9% of its business in 2025. That business is highly regulated, with the company restricted by export controls and, for some programs, classified government activities. Executives have also discussed creating a separate sales entity to handle exports from Tesla's Shanghai plant, one of the people said. Tesla could create separate office systems and bar China-based employees' direct access to other company units, the person said. While Tesla China already has some autonomy, employees more or less work together around the globe and the top executive in China, Tom Zhu, oversees all of Tesla's global automotive business. A potential merger between SpaceX and Tesla would likely trigger intense scrutiny from Beijing, given that a major U.S. defense contractor would control Tesla's factories in China and the factories' know-how and supply chain could be repurposed for the U.S. military, according to people familiar with the matter. Another concern for Beijing is that a deal could put data of China's roughly two million Tesla owners in the hands of an American defense company, they said. In the event of a merger, Beijing would likely seek Tesla's commitment and business guardrails to prevent the influence of SpaceX on Tesla China and illicit diffusion of dual-use goods such as rare-earth materials from Tesla China to SpaceX, the people said. Tesla has two major factories in Shanghai. They make electric cars and batteries that are sold in China and exported to various markets around the world, but not to the U.S. China is Tesla's second-largest market after the U.S., making up around 18% of sales in the first half of 2026. Unlike many other Western competitors, Tesla's automaking operation there isn't part of a Chinese joint venture. During the first Trump administration, Tesla launched an initiative called Project Carbon to relocate its Chinese suppliers to Mexico, a decision that went beyond concern over tariffs from the U.S. on Chinese goods, according to people involved in those plans. Musk was particularly concerned about Tesla's dependence on China for lithium iron phosphate, or LFP, battery cells, as well as its reliance on chips from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, the world's biggest contract chip maker, which faces the threat of war between the island and Beijing, the people said. In 2025, the EV maker decided that it would stop using China-based suppliers by 2027 in its U.S. factories, in part because of U.S. tariffs and government incentives for local production, The Wall Street Journal reported. Mergers involving multinationals typically require regulatory approval across multiple jurisdictions, though most reviews focus primarily on antitrust concerns. In 2018, Qualcomm terminated its proposed purchase of Dutch chip maker NXP Semiconductors after failing to obtain clearance from China. It is common for companies in the U.S. to have contingency plans for their China businesses and a number of U.S. companies have already spun out their China arms into independent companies. Starbucks recently sold a majority stake in its China business. In 2016, Yum Brands, owner of Pizza Hut and KFC, spun off its China unit and sold stakes to local investors. 6:08 PM
Show more