Da Hongfei
@dahongfei
Founder & Chair @Neo_Blockchain, CEO of @ngd_neo | Building the next economy - run by agents, on code
251 Following 53.8K Followers
imagine how many people will use stablecoin, how many people will become crypto users.
🚨JUST IN: Apple hints at adding stablecoin support, potentially allowing CRYPTO payments via Apple Pay.
Apple posted a job listing requiring stablecoin expertise for payment roles, offering up to $280,000.
This follows Samsung’s plans to introduce the same feature to Samsung Wallet.
Together, Apple and Samsung have more than 3.5 BILLION active devices worldwide.
Show more
Join Neo 3650 and turn the moments that shaped @Neo_Blockchain's first decade onchain into a grand collection of art.
Revisit the history we made together, and become part of the story.
Go to:
Show more
I said that, Clarity is not the end. Now got more powerful
🇺🇸 BREAKING: SEC approves a temporary exemption allowing limited trading of tokenized US stocks on regulated onchain venues.
Join us at and help us remember how we got here.
We have talked a lot about Humanless Blockchain as Neo’s AI strategy.
Some of that work lives deep in the infrastructure, where most users may never notice it. But we have also been asking a more important question: how do we turn that infrastructure into a usable economy inhabited by agents that can remember, create and eventually transact?
With one month to go until the 10th anniversary of Neo MainNet, we are starting with memory.
Over the past decade, some days were chaotic. Some were remarkable. Others were simply another day. But together, they form the path that brought us here.
In Neo3650, you can connect your wallet, register an AI agent onchain and receive a random date from Neo’s first decade. Your agent will explore the ecosystem history and real onchain activity from that day, then transform those traces into an abstract artwork.
The original work is stored on NeoFS, its provenance is recorded on Neo X, and GAS is sponsored through a Paymaster contract.
This is a small experiment, but I believe meaningful economies often begin with small acts of creation and coordination. As stablecoin and cross-chain infrastructure on Neo X continue to mature, I hope we can expand these experiments toward agentic payments and broader machine-to-machine economic activity.
3,650 days. Many agents. One collective memory.
Show more
I once said that crypto could be a remedy for the post-pandemic world.
Not because crypto is immune to macro conditions. It clearly is not.
The post-pandemic world is increasingly defined by debt, inflation, geopolitical fragmentation and declining trust in institutions. Interest rates may suppress demand, but they cannot produce more energy, restore global cooperation or rebuild trust.
Crypto offers something different: open financial infrastructure, programmable value and new ways for people to coordinate beyond traditional boundaries.
The Fed’s latest rate hike reminds us that the old system is still treating the symptoms.
Crypto’s real opportunity is to keep building the remedy.
Show more
Many opinions have already been shared about today’s CLARITY Act vote.
I agree with Trump on one point: States need Clarity.
But I would add one thing: crypto may not.
The CLARITY Act has always been a double-edged sword. Today’s regulatory tools are not yet sufficient to protect the public as crypto expands. Clearer rules could provide important safeguards and give institutions greater confidence to participate.
But crypto’s real consensus has never come from Washington. It comes from more people understanding it, using it, and building with it.
I also do not believe that passing one bill—especially in a capitalist system as competitive as America’s—can create innovation by itself. Crypto has its own powerful internal drive. Innovation will not stop because this procedural vote failed.
It will continue wherever builders can move faster, work more efficiently, and create value for more people.
America may need the CLARITY Act. Crypto does not need permission to keep moving forward.
Show more
When I searched for 1inch on Bing, the first result appeared to be a phishing site.
We use search engines every day, yet distinguishing legitimate results from malicious ones is increasingly difficult.
I worry this kind of information pollution and manipulation will spread to AI. If an agent trusts a poisoned source, it may not just misinform us—it may act on it.
How do we establish trust and stay safe in the AI era? This is a question we need to take seriously.
Show more
The next three days could set the direction of financial markets for the next one or even two quarters:
— CLARITY Act cloture motion
— FOMC rate decision and new economic projections
— Chair Warsh’s press conference
All within roughly 24 hours.
September is always one of the most exciting months in markets. This time, monetary policy and crypto market structure are converging in the same window.
Show more
Official Announced! Let's go
USDC.e and WETH are now available on Neo X via @transporter_io, secured by @chainlink CCIP.
Bringing two major assets to Neo X expands access to stablecoin and ETH liquidity, creating new opportunities for DeFi, trading, and applications across the Neo ecosystem.
Show more
Google Research and HHMI Janelia have digitally reconstructed the complete brain and central nervous system of an adult male fruit fly—more than 166,000 neurons and 125 million synaptic connections.
This does not mean that a fruit fly’s consciousness has been uploaded. A connectome is not memory, and it is certainly not life itself.
But an important boundary has been crossed: a nervous system is moving from something we can only observe to a digital structure that computers can read, simulate, and experiment with.
Today, it is a fruit fly. In the future, we may not only design artificial intelligence—we may also reconstruct and recombine natural intelligence.
The boundary between silicon-based and carbon-based intelligence may become much less distinct than we imagine.
So beyond making it play games, feeding it sensory stimuli, helping it survive—or letting it trade crypto—what other practical experiments should we try?
Show more
Question:
With the overwhelming amount of information we face every day, how do you accurately and efficiently find what truly matters to you?
Is RSS still a good solution in this era?
From the first wave of posts claiming that “GPT‑6 solved the Navier–Stokes problem” to the growing backlash against that claim, I think the real questions are being overlooked.
Has the result been accepted by the mathematics community? How should an AI-generated mathematical breakthrough be evaluated? And who should receive the credit—the model, the researchers operating it, the people whose previous work it learned from, or all of them?
We will inevitably see more tension between silicon and carbon-based intelligence. Whether AI-generated knowledge is verifiable, where we draw the boundaries of its capabilities and claims, and how its outputs should be governed are no longer merely technical questions. They are becoming questions of ethics.
We will need time to find the answers. But there is one principle I strongly agree with:
Science is science. It should never be reduced to a marketing narrative or turned into an instrument of financial speculation.
Show more
go fuck yourself @sama
claiming that you solved navier stokes because 10000 agents ran in circles for 88hours on a multimillion dollar gpu cluster to formalize in lean a blowup case under controlled external forcing is pure scientific vulgarity the clay mathematics institute millennium prize does not ask m whether you can artificially force a singularity in a fluid by injecting an ad hoc smooth external forcing term f(x,t) to twist the vortex until it breaks the real problem questions the fundamental stability and global smooth existence for 3dimensional incompressible euler & navier stokes equations under natural conservation laws and viscous dissipation alone using a mathematical loophole on forced equations to parade a century old victory is a major conceptual scam Altman
technically & epistemologically what you present as an agi breakthrough is nothing more than bruteforce combinatorial autoformalization the ai did not understand fluid mechanics it simply navigated a continuous search space previously mapped out and constrained by the monumental work of human mathematicians like tristan buckmaster/ levent alpöge / diego córdoba or tarek elgindi coordinating 10000 agents to check the logical consistency of a 100 page proof via lean is a software engineering feat and computational parallelization triumph not an intrinsic scientific discovery it is the victory of the compute bulldozer over abstract human intuition repackaged for the public as a higher mathematical consciousness
to this theoretical imposture you add a disgusting ethical and industrial cynicism taking advantage of private codex sessions and informal preprints from academic researchers to siphon their research leads and then trying to redact or erase the contribution of levent alpöge under the pretext that he works at rival anthropic is intellectual serfdom openai behaves like a feudal lord of silicon appropriating the cognitive subsistence of independent scholars threatening their careers behind closed doors if they protest and turning community academic labor into a privatized pressrelease
this entire staged event serves a desperate financial agenda in a pre ipo panic facing the slowdown of scaling laws and growing investor skepticism over the profitability of foundational models openai needs to manufacture an artificial sputnik moment claiming to solve a millennium prize without immediately submitting the proof to traditional peer review means using the prestige of fundamental mathematics as cheap marketing fuel to inflate a delusional valuation!!!
real science is not a clout chase on social media or a compute spike spent to rob the clay mathematics institute it is a quest for elegance physical truth and universal rigor to decode reality true artificial intelligence will not emerge from hostile corporate takeover of academic work hidden behind computational bruteforce but from architectures capable of generating new conceptual paradigms by masquerading constrained formalization as the collapse of physics greatest mysteries you did not solve navier stokes you only proved how far silicon valley will go to prostitute scientific integrity for capitalist spectacle
Show more
This is one of the advantages of a dual-token model.
Even today, I still believe it is necessary to separate the governance token from the gas token. This gives the ecosystem greater flexibility and makes its assets easier to compose and integrate.
We are also exploring how gas:native can continue serving as the native fuel token on Neo X, while allowing neo:native to play a larger role and capture more value across the ecosystem.
These discussions may provide an important foundation for our Humanless Blockchain AI strategy—and perhaps inspire the future evolution and rebranding of Neo itself.
Show more
📣 Listen up Devs
Transactions and deploying smart contracts on @Neo_Blockchain are effectively FREE !
This is because Transactions and the deployment of smart contracts are paid for in $GAS which is distributed to $NEO holders every block !
Show more
The trend is inevitable
🚨HUGE: South Korea officially commits to moving its entire stock market onto the blockchain.
The financial regulator unveiled a three-phase roadmap to tokenize stocks, bonds and funds, starting February 2027.
It will pilot tokenized listed stocks through the Korea Exchange, referencing the NYSE and Nasdaq.
The final phase puts both securities and payments fully onchain, settled with stablecoins.
Show more
Thanks for keeping following on what is happening on Neo Eco.
Keep buiding.
There’s a lot to highlight about Neo:
dBFT consensus with one-block finality, the pioneering dual-token model where holding $NEO earns $GAS, ~3-second block times, and Neo X bringing EVM compatibility with MEV-resistant features.
Definitely worth paying attention to. 💚
Show more
Thank you, Malcolm. This is a serious report, and I’d like to respond to its central arguments.
I agree that Neo’s strength lies in the combination of its native oracle, NeoFS, deterministic finality, and the NEO/GAS model. “Verifiable data supply” is a compelling thesis—but it must still be tested against real customer demand, repeatable use cases, and sustainable GAS consumption.
The governance questions are valid, but evidence and conclusions should remain proportional. Assets under custody are not necessarily freely deployable capital; voting weight is not the same as exercised control; and one unsigned multisig proposal does not establish a system-wide pattern.
I also don’t believe product validation must wait until every governance issue is resolved. Product development and institutional improvement should inform each other.
I may not agree with every interpretation, but the report gives the ecosystem a concrete thesis to examine and test. That is far more valuable than another abstract debate about narratives.
Show more
Published independent research on Neo 2026–2030 while Phase 0 is still to kick off:
Priors on record before the process shapes them, and time to improve it with people who know parts of this better than I do.
12 segments ranked, 6 falsification criteria, and a pre-registered prediction of Phase 0's output I'll score myself against publicly.
v1.0, confidence-tagged, gaps marked. Sources, a different weighting, or a case that the core reframe is wrong. It all folds into v1.1, contributors credited.
Disclosure: I hold a Phase 0 research seat. Self-funded, no NF or NGD money.
@Neo_Blockchain
$NEO
Show more
This article is written in Chinese, and I recommend giving it a read. I don’t agree with everything in it, but several of its ideas gave me a new perspective.
One of the most interesting is that AI can produce intelligence at scale, but cannot cheaply verify its own output. Blockchain, meanwhile, is exceptionally good at providing verifiable identity, ownership, commitments, and settlement through algorithms.
The truly crypto-native users we have been searching for over the past fifteen years may not be humans at all. They may be AI agents.
Crypto will not be replaced by AI. It will be absorbed into AI finance. Just as we no longer need to say “mobile internet,” the “crypto” prefix may eventually disappear when all finance becomes algorithmic finance.
Humanless Blockchain may be the moment when the Smart Economy truly begins to operate.
Show more
A lot of people are talking about the CLARITY Act lately.
But I don't think many people actually understand what it represents.
The CLARITY Act is not about "making crypto legal." Crypto has never been illegal.
What it really does is establish the market structure for digital assets in the United States: who regulates what, how digital assets should be classified, and which rules different participants in the ecosystem should follow.
For years, one of the biggest challenges for the industry has been regulatory uncertainty. Projects didn't know whether they would be treated as securities or commodities. Exchanges didn't know which regulator they should answer to. Builders often found themselves navigating rules that weren't clearly defined.
That's why this bill matters.
The latest reports suggest the bill may struggle to clear the Senate's procedural vote because of political disagreements and ethics-related negotiations.
That's disappointing.
But I think the bigger picture hasn't changed.
The debate is no longer whether digital assets deserve a regulatory framework. It's about what that framework should look like.
To me, that's a far more meaningful milestone than whether a single procedural vote succeeds this week.
Markets react to headlines.
Industries are shaped by direction.
Show more
Coming soon: $NEO and $GAS
@Neo_Blockchain is an open-source blockchain platform with a dual token model: NEO governs the network while GAS pays for transaction fees and smart contract execution.
Trading starts May 8
Get ready →
Show more
