紫云(@dviolettchan):I was invited to review for NeurIPS 2026 and assigned 4 papers. 2 of 4 are complete AI slop and deserve strong rejects. They study homework-level problems, use overly lengthy yet uninformative language, and include obviously AI-generated method figures that are not even vector graphics. I just found an interesting shortcut for identifying these papers: check the number of references. The authors obviously did not systematically survey the area, and many of these papers cite fewer than 20 works in total.

2026.06.20 06:35

I was invited to review for NeurIPS 2026 and assigned 4 papers. 2 of 4 are complete AI slop and deserve strong rejects. They study homework-level problems, use overly lengthy yet uninformative language, and include obviously AI-generated method figures that are not even vector graphics. I just found an interesting shortcut for identifying these papers: check the number of references. The authors obviously did not systematically survey the area, and many of these papers cite fewer than 20 works in total.

337

Forward to community

Most Popular Users