Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

Shann³
@shannholmberg
I cover AI marketing & growth. Sharing every framework as I build it. Growth @lunarstrategy @turtledotxyz
Joined November 2021
12.5K Following    38.2K Followers
how to get faster and cheaper videos from Opus 5.5 using a decision model for frame checks reduced video review costs by 90% and review time by 75% when you create videos with Claude Opus 5.5, checking thousands of frames can consume a lot of time and tokens you can set this up so a decision model checks the frames, while Opus 5.5 reviews the flagged issues and fixes the code here's how it works: 1. build your video with Opus 5.5 give it your idea, brand book, assets and references, then work through the storyboard and animation if you're using Remotion, it renders the code into a video 2. separate the repeated checks from the creative work use code to check measurable requirements and a decision model to inspect the frames > code checks things like text size, blank or frozen frames and colours against your brand rules > the decision model reads the frames and answers specific questions to help identify problems > selected frames and check results go to Opus 5.5 for further review 3. have Opus 5.5 investigate and fix the problems it reviews the selected frames and edits the video code where needed render the changes and run the checks again this reduces the amount of frame-by-frame review you ask Opus 5.5 to do 4. review the finished video yourself watch the pacing, sound, transitions and whether the video matches what you wanted to create the automated checks help find defects, while you review the creative decisions and overall quality SageCut is one implementation of this for Remotion videos in the example Chris shared, Sage (decision model) read 3,153 frames for $0.16 (the frame-reading cost, not the full production cost) the savings come from the review stage, rendering still takes time start with a video you've already reviewed and check whether it catches the problems you found then compare the review cost and time with your existing process
Show more
Read this if you make videos with Claude. I built a skill that cut my QA cost on this video from $127 to 16 cents. It was made with Claude in Remotion. It's called SageCut. It swaps the LLM out of frame-by-frame QA and uses a multimodal decision model, Sage (@levantolabs), instead. I'm the only video guy at Levanto. I run 3 Claude plans and have been making Remotion videos since early this year, with BlenderMCP in the mix, so the output is pro-grade with very little babysitting. The problem: it burned through my Max plan, and a video could take 2 days. When I dug into the workflow, the reason was that Claude subagents were reviewing every single frame. That cost a ton and added 4+ hours per video. SageCut hands that step to Sage. Sage is great at spotting defective frames, and only those get passed to Opus 5.5 to fix. Across 6 A/B tests the output was exactly the same, at 1/10 the QA cost and 1/4 the QA time. On this video, Sage read all 3,153 frames for 16 cents. If you make Remotion videos, try it. The link to skill is below. How long does a Remotion video take you right now with Claude?
Show more
0
53
1.2K
74
Forward to community