Well, that’s quite bold of you. 　In Buddhism, male sexual desire is considered the primary source of the various worldly passions that people harbor—which are the fundamental cause of “suffering”—and the goal is to achieve “liberation” by eradicating them. That’s likely why they speak of “impermanence” and “emptiness.” 　In Shinto as well, I believe remarks that reveal unrestrained desire are truly considered a “shame.” 　These concepts are deeply ingrained in the Japanese mindset. That is precisely why there is a mindset that views the luxury of “Half a tatami mat when standing, one tatami mat when lying down” as shameful, and why the gap between rich and poor is so narrow in Japan. 　I’m sorry to say this to Muslims, but with teachings such as “① equating the fulfillment of male desire with paradise, ② attempting to regulate women’s clothing to prevent men from becoming aroused, and ③ allowing a man to have up to four wives if he is capable,” 　I want you to understand that these teachings are fundamentally looked down upon by many Japanese people and those involved in Buddhism. 　What’s more, it’s appalling that they do not seek “the salvation of all sentient beings,” do not tolerate polytheists, and even teach that they should be killed—I just want to ask, “Is there any love in that?!” 　I wonder if it’s just a “religion for strong men that affirms all desires.” ★ In “Islam in Japan,” I’d like to thoroughly re-read the Quran and the Hadith to make it a “religion of love.”

Thousands of Muslims shut down NYC streets with blood-drenched donkeys, men beating their chests, and public displays honoring martyrdom. This is Father’s Day in NYC. Very Western and progressive, right?