Vortex | BIP448(@theonevortex):LOL I'm not reverting to some fallacy, I've argued at length for the dangers of 110 here: https://t.co/JTPBfsonZV Core was clear about it from the start on their post here: https://t.co/iYL6P45oh2 And I've argued why it was good to remove the limit here: https://t.co/oAbXnGfgSu with onchain evidence proving it here: https://t.co/HRr1Iqpmok Narrative's the same, meanwhile 110 side changes narratives every day: first it was v30 was gonna kill bitcoin, then spam, then it was CSAM which I proved was completely igorant here: https://t.co/Ga8RZoBaEJ Nah there's good reason why 110 lost, because it was ridiculous from the start.

Vortex | BIP448

@theonevortex

Former host of The Bitcoin News Show. Creator of Bitcoin Is. And that is enough.

Joined February 2011

1 Following 53.8K Followers

Vortex | BIP448@theonevortex

2026.05.15 01:49

LOL I'm not reverting to some fallacy, I've argued at length for the dangers of 110 here: Core was clear about it from the start on their post here: And I've argued why it was good to remove the limit here: with onchain evidence proving it here: Narrative's the same, meanwhile 110 side changes narratives every day: first it was v30 was gonna kill bitcoin, then spam, then it was CSAM which I proved was completely igorant here: Nah there's good reason why 110 lost, because it was ridiculous from the start.