We’ve trained Claude to flag potential misuse in conversations, a technique we call self-assessment. Right after it responds, Claude gives a preliminary safety assessment of the conversation. Since we began using self-assessment in June, it has surfaced misuse that our other safeguards weren’t designed to catch. Because Claude has already read the conversation, self-assessment is very efficient. And unlike classifiers, which target a discrete set of harms, it draws on Claude’s own judgment, so it gets more accurate as our models improve. Read more on our new Safeguards blog:

官方版适配移动端在即，我却打造了一个DeepSeek Harness移动端的终极答案？！ 地址： 精美原生UI+手机本地运行DSH+远程控制电脑+插件市场+社交功能+宠物系统+可交互UI+手机操控+可更换主题+兼容官方所有插件++++… 随时随刻，想Go就Go～

Introducing Interaction Bench 0.1 Preview — Benchmarked on what users feel - 44 tasks from 25 real open-source apps - GPT-6 Astra leads at 34.1%, Claude Opus 5.5 at 27.3%, others 4.5–15.9% - Agents get the user's goal, never the bug GitHub: Website: 9🧵s next 👇

‼️ BREAKING: US officials believe Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is the target of a Chinese spy plot. They believe Alice Huang, a Megaspeed executive seen at his side in Taiwan, is a Chinese intelligence asset. President Trump has been briefed about the matter.

Google’s Gemini 4 Carbon is the new #1# on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5, and second only to Claude Opus 5.5 on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index Gemini 4 Carbon scores 59 on Intelligence Index v5, driven by leading performance in complex reasoning, knowledge, and scientific tasks. It also has large gains in coding and knowledge work, particularly when compared to other Gemini models, but it is not leading in all these areas. As with launch of Gemini 4 Argon, Gemini 4 Carbon is being rolled out to selected users and is not yet publicly available. Google is offering a 50% launch discount, with no confirmed end date. All our charts and figures use standard pricing for both Gemini 4 Carbon and Argon. Key results for Gemini 4 Carbon with high reasoning: ➤ Gemini 4 Carbon leads the Intelligence Index v5, with the #1# score in 4 of the 9 Index evaluations: HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench-Science, AA-Omniscience, AutomationBench-AA. Carbon makes substantial gains elsewhere but is not leading in coding and knowledge work ➤ Behind only Claude Opus 5.5 on coding agents: With Antigravity CLI, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) scores 59 only 3 points behind Claude Code with Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 62) on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index. Carbon ranks second on both Terminal-Bench 4.0 (64%) and FrontierCode v1.1 (51%), behind Claude Opus 5.5 (max) at 56%. Google has historically underperformed in this area and so this improvement stands out ➤ Improved agentic knowledge work, but not yet leading: On AA-Briefcase, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) scores 1609 Elo, a 126-point improvement over Gemini 4 Argon (high, 1483), but still behind models including Grok 4.7 (xhigh, 1638), Muse Wonder (max, 1659) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (1678). The largest gain comes from Presentation, up 293 Elo to 1598, alongside a 120-point improvement in Analytical Quality to 1671 ➤ Lower Cost per Task than Claude Opus 5.5 for comparable overall intelligence: Gemini 4 Carbon costs $7.76 per Intelligence Index task, ~23% less than Claude Opus 5.5 (max, $10.04) but ~1.2x GPT-6 Astra (max, $6.25). It uses 123k output tokens per task, 29% fewer than Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 173k). At the same $4/$20 standard pricing, its Cost per Task is in line with Gemini 4 Argon ($7.68), while scoring 9 points higher on the Intelligence Index ➤ Leading AA-Omniscience v1.1 score, with low hallucination: Gemini 4 Carbon scores 54 on our recently updated AA-Omniscience v1.1, 6 points ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 48) and 8 points ahead of Gemini 4 Argon (46). Accuracy (% correct) rises 10 points over Argon to 58%, while its hallucination rate rises from 4% to 11%. This is still the second lowest of any model, behind only Argon, compared with 50% for both Claude Opus 5.5 (max) and GPT-6 Astra (max) Key model details: ➤ Context Window: 1M tokens ➤ Multimodality: Text, image, video, and speech input, with text output ➤ Pricing: $4/$20 per 1M input/output tokens, the same as Gemini 4 Argon’s standard pricing, with a 50% discount. Cached input tokens receive a 95% discount ($0.20 per 1M) Congratulations to the @GoogleDeepMind team!

我他妈又弄一个新活，你的哈苏现在可以使用 GPT 了，控制对焦，快门，甚至唠闲嗑都可以我真的笑晕了。 多亏了@openai，@fedesarquis 这是你要的哈苏接入 GPT 吗哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈 将会开源到我的 git 中

Claude风控天机泄露😱 1. Claude 的风控是积分制：注册时会先给账号打分，之后根据行为加分或减分，低于一定分值就会直接封号（很少加分）。 2. 注册：邮箱和 IP 的权重最高。IP 不一定要家宽，但一定要干净，例如自建 IP。Gmail 已经不是最优选，他们现在使用的是一些其他高权重邮箱。注册时直接弹 KYC 的账号可以直接放弃。注册环节很重要，否则后续稍有高危行为就可能直接封号。使用手机 App 注册会加分。 3. 支付：刚注册就订阅会减分，直接订阅 Max 会大幅减分，最好间隔一两天再订阅 Pro。订阅时弹出 KYC 意味着账号处于考察期，但不一定会封；简而言之，A 社想先看 KYC 结果再决定。KYC 使用中国护照没有问题，最大的问题是不能一人多扫；闲鱼上很多账号都属于这种情况，要小心。 4. 注册后的 IP：最重要的是稳定，千万不要随便切换，尽可能一直使用同一个 IP；同样要求干净即可，不要求一定家宽，最好与注册 IP 一致。代理一定要开启全局模式并启用 TUN，这是重点。 5. 老号：老号权重非常高，也就是积分很多，容错率更高。账号积分会随着账号寿命增加，不过 2023 年的老号才是显著更高。 6. 使用：不要一上来就把周限额用完，尽量控制并平均使用；用量大的宁可开两个号轮换使用，也不要一次性用完。使用 CLI 和 Desktop 都可以，Desktop 似乎会少量加分。尽量少用网页端，最好只保留手机端和 Desktop 登录。 7. 时区和语言基本不减分，或仅极少量减分，没必要特意调整。 8. 高并发、反复提问同一个问题、频繁登录、频繁切换 IP 都会大幅减分。 9. 手机端使用会少量加分。开启记忆功能会加分，甚至可能记忆文件越多分数越高。 10. 支付方式为国外实体正规银行信用卡会加分，其次是 Google Play。Apple Pay 不了解；官方礼品卡不减分，但要注意来源是否为黑卡；虚拟卡直接绑定会减分。 11. 到达斩杀线后可能进入观察期。例如及格线是 60 分，账号 55 分就进入观察；如果继续扣分直接掉到 40 分，就会直接封号。观察期的典型特征是掉登录。有的高权重号可能经历两三个观察期才被封。 12. 多设备登录会大幅扣分，最好只在一台电脑上使用一个客户端。 13. Windows 和 macOS 没什么区别，Linux 使用会减分。 14. 跟 Claude 说自己是中国人也没事，不会因为记忆文件就封号。 15. 充值 Credits 会加分，不过成本太高，尚未进行大量实验。 16. 大量使用 Fable 会减分。 17. 升级 Max 大概率会直接进入观察期，除非是积分特别多的高权重号。观察期内有减分行为，大概率会封号。 18. 在工作时间使用不会扣分，不会出现因为使用北京时间就封号的情况。