Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

Search results for Record_Delivery
Record_Delivery community
One keyword maps to one global community path.
Create community
People
Not Found
Tweets including Record_Delivery
Q2 2025 was a seminal point in Tesla’s history: the beginning of our transition from leading the electric vehicle and renewable energy industries to also becoming a leader in AI, robotics & related services (hi @robotaxi) We officially launched our Robotaxi service in Austin in June, with our camera-only architecture with neural networks trained on data from our global fleet of millions of vehicles. Q2 Highlights North America – Test drives in North America are up 20% sequentially (as you know, butts in seats ...) – Model Y is becoming more accessible with the recent launch of Model Y RWD, which starts at under $45k with 357 miles of range APAC – We achieved record delivery volumes in South Korea 🇰🇷 (@Tesla_Korea), Malaysia 🇲🇾, the Philippines 🇵🇭 & Singapore 🇸🇬 – In July, we launched the Model Y in India 🇮🇳, marking our entry into the world’s third-largest car market @Tesla_India – New Model 3 earned a 5-star Overall Safety Rating from ANCAP, achieving 95% in the Child Occupant Protection pillar – the highest result recorded to date against ANCAP’s 2023-2025 criteria – We continue to prepare for broader release of FSD Supervised in China 🇨🇳 this year (pending regulatory approval) EMEA – Model Y was the best-selling vehicle in Norway 🇳🇴 year-to-date & in Türkiye🇹🇷 , the Netherlands 🇳🇱, Switzerland 🇨🇭 & Austria 🇦🇹 in June – New Model 3 achieved a 5-star Overall Safety Rating from EuroNCAP & is the safest car in Europe (based on the latest EuroNCAP test scores) – We continue to prepare for the launch of FSD Supervised in Europe this year (pending regulatory approval) AI Software & Hardware @Tesla_AI – World's first autonomous delivery to a customer with a new production Model Y driving itself ~30 minutes from the factory across town to its new owner's home, including on highways – We expanded AI training compute with an additional 16k H200 GPUs at Gigafactory Texas, bringing Cortex to a total of 67k H100 equivalents Battery, Powertrain & Manufacturing – Our lithium refining & cathode production plants remain on track to begin production in 2025, on-shoring production of critical battery materials to the US – We are on course to begin domestic production of our first LFP cells for our energy storage products later this year Energy generation & storage – Record Powerwall deployments for the fifth consecutive quarter – Gross profit increased sequentially & year-over-year, reaching a record of $846 million – We started deploying @Tesla_Megapack from Megafactory Shanghai as the ramp continues as planned Services & other – We added over 2,900 net new Supercharging stalls, growing the network 18% year-over-year @TeslaCharging 🔋
Show more
0
970
12.2K
2.3K
Forward to community
The global helium supply chain is tightening: China's helium imports from Qatar have collapsed to near zero, from a peak of ~65 million cubic feet in late-2025, the lowest on record. Imports from Russia have declined -50 million cubic feet over the last 2 quarters, to ~38.5 million cubic feet, the lowest since Q3 2025. The drop comes as the Iran War disrupts exports from Qatar, which supplied ~33% of global helium before the conflict, As a result, spot helium prices for immediate delivery have roughly DOUBLED over the last 4 months. Meanwhile, China has introduced new export controls on helium, despite not being a major producer itself, as the country relies heavily on imports to supply critical industries, including semiconductor manufacturing and medical equipment. China has also been an important transit route for Russian helium into Europe since direct EU imports from Russia were restricted. Helium supply is being squeezed from multiple directions.
Show more
0
67
870
174
Forward to community
Three Credible Sources, Three Different Timelines: I Asked Apodex @Apodex_AI to Judge the Foldable iPhone Rumors   As of July 16, 2026, Apple has not confirmed whether it will release a foldable iPhone before the end of the year.   The problem is not a lack of reporting. It is that credible reports point in different directions.   Bloomberg's Mark Gurman says Apple's first foldable iPhone remains on track for a September 2026 debut. Nikkei and Reuters describe engineering problems that could delay shipments. DigiTimes and MacRumors suggest production has slipped, but Apple is still targeting fall 2026.   That made the foldable iPhone a useful test for Apodex.   I asked whether Apple would both announce and begin selling its first foldable iPhone by December 31, 2026. Apodex had to identify conflicting sources, explain their weights, build three scenarios, state a confidence level, and list the signals that would invalidate its conclusion.   The distinction between "announce" and "begin selling" matters. Apple could introduce the phone in September while delaying availability until December or 2027.   How Apodex Weighed the Sources   Bloomberg's September timeline became the baseline. Gurman has a strong record on Apple product timing, and other outlets independently support a fall 2026 target. Apodex still down-weighted the claim because the timing was not final and later reporting introduced production risk.   Nikkei's engineering details were treated as credible and given substantial weight. However, Apodex did not treat a 2027 delay as the base case because the report described it as a worst-case outcome, not a confirmed schedule change.   The Barclays view received less weight because it came from a single analyst note. Still, its pattern was plausible: Apple introduced the iPhone X in September 2017 and released it in November. A September announcement followed by December sales could reconcile the reports.   What Actually Decides the Outcome   The forecast depends on hinge reliability, OLED and assembly yield, production speed, and Apple's quality threshold.   A product can be ready to announce while remaining difficult to manufacture at scale. Better yield supports fall sales; continued instability makes December or 2027 more plausible.   Three Scenarios   Apodex divided the outcome into three paths:   - Early case, about 25%: Apple announces the phone in September and begins sales in late September or October. - Base case, about 55%: Apple announces it in September, with limited retail availability beginning in December. - Delayed case, about 20%: engineering or yield problems push consumer sales into 2027.   The base case preserves Bloomberg's September introduction while accommodating the reported production delay and December-shipment forecast.   What Would Prove It Wrong?   The probability of a 2026 sale should fall sharply if Bloomberg, Reuters, Nikkei, or Apple reports that volume production has moved into 2027. The same applies if suppliers delay components into Q1 2027 or if assembly and display-yield failures continue into October.   The cleanest public test will be Apple's September event. If it passes without a foldable-iPhone announcement, the base case fails. Confirmed mass production, carrier preparation, or 2026 delivery dates would move the forecast in the opposite direction.   Why the Test Matters   The useful result was not the percentage itself. It was the structure of the judgment.   Apodex compared contradictory claims, assigned different weights, built multiple paths, and stated what would force it to change its mind. That matches its official positioning as a heavy-duty solver: turning information into evidence through verification and reaching a defensible conclusion under uncertainty.   The narrower claim is more useful: when the answer does not yet exist, Apodex can make the evidence, uncertainty, and failure conditions inspectable.   Try Apodex:
Show more
Rebuttal to Misconceptions About China’s Economy: Superficial Analysis Easily Leads to Misjudgments of Facts and Future Trends Recent commentary draws forced parallels between China and Japan prior to its economic stagnation, advances the one-sided claim that “China invests in the state while the United States and Japan invest in its people”, denies China’s livelihood safeguards, distorts debt logic, smears its development model, and even misrepresents the underlying rationale behind real estate, urbanization and people-centered policies. Such arguments ignore objective facts of China’s development, confuse disparities in national development stages and institutional systems, and misjudge the trajectory of China’s economy and society. This article systematically refutes these fallacies from five core dimensions — debt logic, livelihood security, the essence of development, real estate and urbanization trends, and policy orientation — to restore the fundamental logic of China’s development and its primary future pathways. I. Rebuttal on Debt Structure: The Fallacy That “China Shifts Debt Burdens Downward to the Public, While the U.S. and Japan Provide State Backstops Upward” — A Conceptual Sleight of Hand Ignoring Institutional Differences Core flawed claim: Individuals in the United States and Japan can file for bankruptcy with state-backed debt relief, while China lacks personal bankruptcy mechanisms and imposes lifelong debt obligations. This purportedly leaves China’s central government balance sheet robust while local governments and households bear heavy burdens, amounting to “downward debt transfer”. 1. Personal bankruptcy and debt restructuring are not entirely absent in China; pilots are underway with nationwide rollout accelerating The assertion that “China offers almost no access to debt restructuring or personal bankruptcy” directly contradicts reality. Pioneering local pilots: Shenzhen launched China’s first personal bankruptcy ordinance in 2021. In March 2026, the first personal bankruptcy liquidation case completed its four-year observation period, granting the debtor legal discharge of remaining liabilities and enabling a fresh start for “honest yet unfortunate debtors”, as confirmed by the Supreme People’s Court of China. Xiamen introduced personal bankruptcy protection regulations in November 2025 and has accepted 11 related cases. Jiangsu and Zhejiang have carried out pilot schemes for centralized personal debt resolution, with authorities in Nanjing, Wujiang and other regions helping hundreds of debtors resolve liabilities and repair credit records, per the Supreme People’s Court. Clear top-level design: The Chinese government has explicitly stated its intent to “explore the establishment of a personal bankruptcy system”. The Supreme People’s Court is summarizing pilot experience, expanding trial scope and advancing nationwide institutional implementation. Mortgage debt is not a lifelong obligation: To address unfinished housing projects and mortgage defaults, multiple regions have introduced policies supporting mortgage payment extensions and negotiated repayment arrangements. Judicial practice offers debt restructuring and interest relief for creditworthy debtors facing insolvency, rejecting the absolutist narrative that debtors remain liable for loans even after abandoning properties. 2. Differences in debt structures stem from development stages and governance choices, rather than insufficient prioritization of citizens Framing differing debt structures simply as “investing in the state versus investing in people” confuses development stages, governance models and risk prevention logic. High public debt in the U.S. and Japan represents mortgaging the future, rather than proactive citizen support: Japan’s government debt-to-GDP ratio reached 249.7% in 2023, versus 118.7% for the United States. Both figures far exceed international warning thresholds, stemming from prolonged fiscal deficits, welfare overcommitment and monetary easing. The so-called “citizen backstop” amounts to consuming tomorrow’s resources, with costs ultimately passed to households via inflation and taxation, according to the Ministry of Finance of China. China’s moderate central government debt preserves room for long-term development without neglecting livelihood safeguards: China’s full-caliber government debt ratio stood at 67.5% in 2023, well below the U.S., Japan and the G7 average of 123.4%, data from the Ministry of Finance shows. Maintaining a sound central balance sheet aims to fend off systemic risks and sustain long-term growth capacity. As a large developing country, emulating the U.S. and Japan by drastically expanding government debt would likely trigger inflation, exchange rate volatility and sovereign credit risks, ultimately harming public interests. Local government debt challenges are transitional growing pains being addressed via comprehensive debt management initiatives: In 2024, the central government rolled out a CNY 6 trillion program to replace implicit local government debt, facilitating debt restructuring and interest burden reduction. This represents coordinated national risk-sharing to protect public welfare, rather than allowing local authorities to shift liabilities to residents, as documented on the National People’s Congress website. 3. Total debt volume and structure cannot be compared in isolation from national conditions Claims that China’s overall debt volume is comparable to that of the U.S. and Japan overlook stark differences in debt usage, asset quality and repayment capacity. China’s debt primarily funds productive assets: Most local government debt finances transport, water conservancy, energy, affordable housing and other infrastructure, generating substantial tangible assets with ongoing cash flow to support repayment, per official sources. U.S. and Japanese government debt largely finances consumption expenditure: Their public liabilities mostly cover welfare spending, military outlays and interest payments, creating few productive assets. Repayment relies on taxation and monetary expansion, rendering such debt far less sustainable. II. Rebuttal on Underlying Values: The Fallacy That “China Invests in the State and Distrusts Its Citizens, While the U.S. and Japan Invest in People and Trust Markets” — A Distortion of Fundamentals Contradicting Facts Core flawed claim: China distrusts its people and treats citizens merely as “cogs in a machine”; its policies rely on state leadership and investment-driven growth. By contrast, the U.S. and Japan uphold individual freedom and market forces, directing resources toward residents. 1. China explicitly advocates “investing in people” with steadily rising livelihood spending, contrary to the “state-only investment” narrative Critics disregard that the 2025 Government Work Report incorporated “investing in people” into national policy for the first time, committing to “channel more funds and resources toward investing in people and livelihood services” (State Council of China). China operates the world’s largest social security system with rising protection standards: As of the end of 2024, basic pension insurance covered 1.07 billion people and basic medical insurance 1.33 billion people, with coverage rates exceeding 95%. Cumulative surpluses for pension, unemployment and work injury insurance funds reached CNY 10.2 trillion. Universal basic medical and pension coverage has been achieved, with benefit standards continuously improving. The share of fiscal spending on livelihoods keeps rising: Expenditure on education, healthcare, elderly care and housing security accounts for over 70% of total fiscal outlays. The per capita fiscal subsidy for urban and rural resident medical insurance reached CNY 670 in 2024, a 21.8% increase from 2020. Construction of affordable housing continues, and the 15th Five-Year Plan pledges greater supply to resolve housing difficulties for new residents and young people. Policy priorities are shifting “from investing in physical assets toward investing in people”: Central authorities stress integrating investment in tangible assets with investment in human capital, boosting funding for education, healthcare and childcare to upgrade citizen capabilities, protect people’s rights and advance all-round human development. This directly repudiates slander claiming China distrusts its population. 2. State guidance does not equate to distrust of markets; China pursues the optimal combination of an effective market and a capable government Pitting state intervention against market confidence misrepresents the core logic of China’s socialist market economy. Markets play a decisive role in resource allocation: Private enterprise contributes over 50% of China’s GDP, more than 60% of tax revenue and over 80% of urban employment. Market vitality flourishes across e-commerce, new energy and advanced manufacturing, granting ample room for innovators including enterprises and individuals. Government intervention remedies market failures, safeguards fairness and prevents systemic risks: As an enormous developing economy with immature market mechanisms, unfettered markets would inevitably widen wealth gaps, create regional imbalances and leave public services undersupplied. State investment in infrastructure, public welfare and breakthrough technologies builds a sound environment for market activity and provides a safety net for residents — not to control citizens. 3. The “Screw Spirit” embodies dedication rather than instrumentalization, and is fully compatible with individual freedom and advancement Attempts to twist the Lei Feng spirit and the “Screw Spirit” into evidence that citizens are treated as tools of state machinery misrepresent their essence. The Screw Spirit centers on dedication to work, selfless contribution and accountability, representing traditional Chinese virtues and core socialist values. It aligns fully with individuals pursuing personal aspirations and realizing self-worth. Countless ordinary people strive in ordinary posts, contributing to national advancement while achieving personal growth and well-being. China constitutionally and legally guarantees citizens’ personal liberty, property rights, freedom to start businesses and lawful mobility. Citizens enjoy freedom of occupation, entrepreneurship, investment and cross-border travel under legal frameworks. Allegations restricting individual autonomy and mobility are baseless. III. Rebuttal on Policy Orientation: The Fallacy That “The 15th Five-Year Plan Continues to Prioritize Investment, While Domestic Demand Expansion and Social Security Remain Rhetoric” — Ignoring Planning Blueprints and Misinterpreting Policies Core flawed claim: Chinese policies favor government investment over domestic consumption and social security. The 15th Five-Year Plan perpetuates the old development model, and China’s social security system lags far behind Japan’s pre-stagnation framework. 1. The 15th Five-Year Plan centers on expanding domestic demand, prioritizing livelihoods and high-quality development, rather than overreliance on investment Critics overlook the plan’s core guideline: putting people first, boosting domestic demand and advancing common prosperity. Domestic demand stands as a primary growth engine: The plan identifies expanding domestic demand as a priority, unlocking consumption potential by lifting household incomes, improving social security and optimizing income distribution, transitioning the economy from investment-led growth to dual drivers of consumption and investment. Livelihood security constitutes a key focus: The plan launches four major livelihood programs covering housing, elderly care, healthcare and education. Initiatives include scaling up affordable housing, national coordination of pension insurance, deepening medical reform and promoting equitable education. It targets markedly improved living environments and significantly more equal public services by 2030. Government investment targets livelihood priorities and development bottlenecks: Public investment no longer focuses on extensive infrastructure construction. Instead, it supports affordable housing, urban renewal, public transit, medical and educational facilities alongside breakthrough technologies and new productive forces — essentially investing in people’s wellbeing and long-term prospects (People’s Daily). 2. While gaps persist, China’s social security system has achieved remarkable progress and universal coverage; it is not empty rhetoric Claims that China’s social security falls far short of Japan’s pre-bubble standards ignore the leapfrog development of China’s social safety net from scratch. Coverage scale: China delivers universal medical and pension insurance covering 1.4 billion people, forming the world’s largest social security system. Though Japan boasted mature social security before its economic slowdown, it served only 120 million residents and already faced long-term pressures from low fertility, aging populations and social fund deficits. Differences in development stages must be acknowledged: Japan is a developed economy with per capita GDP exceeding USD 30,000, while China remains a developing nation with per capita GDP above USD 12,000. Social security standards naturally align with economic development levels, and cross-country comparisons cannot be decoupled from national conditions. China built its social security architecture within decades, a process that took developed nations over a century, earning worldwide recognition. Continuous improvement is underway: Social security benefits rise year by year. In 2025, the minimum basic pension standard for rural and urban residents increased by CNY 20, the largest hike since the system’s founding. The personal pension system has rolled out nationwide, accelerating formation of a multi-tier social security framework (Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security). IV. Rebuttal on Real Estate and Urbanization: The Fallacy That “Young People Are Trapped, Unfinished Housing Projects Stem from Government Profit-Seeking, and Secondary Urbanization Has No Prospects in China” — Distorted Facts and Misjudged Trends Core flawed claim: Unfinished residential projects exist because governments profit from real estate, trapping young people as low-wage workers. China lacks secondary urbanization; large-city agglomeration holds no promise, and housing prices in first-tier cities will not recover. 1. Unfinished housing projects are transitional challenges; authorities fully prioritize project delivery to protect residents, contradicting claims of state profiteering Attributing stalled housing projects to government pursuit of real estate revenue misidentifies root causes — reckless high-leverage expansion by property developers — and overlooks massive official efforts to guarantee completed housing. Primary drivers of unfinished projects: Some developers pursued blind expansion, diverted funds and defaulted on debt. Cases such as Evergrande’s capital diversion into non-real estate ventures and overseas spending reflect corporate operational failures, not government fault. Comprehensive official action to ensure home delivery: Since 2022, the central government has set up special funds for unfinished housing, while local governments established dedicated working groups to restart suspended projects. By the end of 2025, over 95% of overdue residential developments had resumed construction to safeguard homebuyers’ rights (People’s Daily). Land finance is a transitional phenomenon undergoing transformation: Land transfer revenue accounted for 40% of local fiscal revenue in 2018, falling to 25% by 2024. Local governments are gradually shifting toward sustainable revenue sources including industrial taxation and property tax, rather than permanently relying on real estate-related proceeds. 2. Secondary urbanization toward larger cities represents an inevitable trend; housing prices in first-tier cities are expected to stabilize and recover next year Dismissing secondary urbanization and bearish forecasts for first-tier housing prices contradict urban development laws, population mobility patterns and policy directions. Secondary urbanization centered on metropolitan agglomeration is an objective trend: China’s permanent resident urbanization rate stands at 66.2%, yet household registration urbanization reaches merely 48.3%. Over 200 million migrant residents lack full urban integration. Going forward, populations will continue flowing toward first-tier, new first-tier cities and urban clusters. Major cities concentrate industries, employment opportunities and high-quality public services, attracting inbound residents inevitably. Secondary urbanization chiefly entails population migration from small and medium-sized cities to metropolitan clusters, and from rural areas to counties and cities. Rationale for projected stabilization and recovery of first-tier housing prices next year: • Supply-demand rebalancing: First-tier cities face constrained land supply, sustained population inflows and robust demand for upgraded housing, sustaining long-term supply shortages. • Continued policy easing: Universal lifting of purchase restrictions, minimum down payments lowered to 15%, record-low mortgage rates and tax reductions for housing swaps boost market confidence. • Economic recovery support: China achieved 5.2% GDP growth in 2025, with growth projected to rise above 5.5% in 2026. Improved employment and household incomes will underpin mild housing price recovery. • Activated stock housing market: Second-hand properties make up over 70% of housing transactions in first-tier cities. Urban renewal and renovation of older communities unlock demand for upgraded housing and drive moderate price growth. 3. Housing pressure on young generations constitutes a transitional growing pain, with targeted policy relief underway Claims that youth are trapped and reduced to low-wage laborers ignore tailored support policies covering housing, employment and consumption. Housing support: First-tier and new first-tier cities expand supply of affordable rental housing and shared ownership housing with rents 30%–50% below market rates to accommodate new residents and young people. Employment support: Graduate employment subsidies, startup incentives and expanded public sector recruitment delivered 12.44 million new urban jobs in 2024, exceeding annual targets. Consumption burden relief: Special individual income tax deductions for housing rent, children’s education and eldercare, alongside consumer vouchers and interest rate cuts, reduce financial pressure on young people and lift consumption willingness. V. Rebuttal Against Other Slanderous Claims: “A-Share Market Merely Serves Financing Goals”, “Restrictions on Cross-Border Investment” and “Passport Controls” — Malicious and Groundless Rumors 1. China’s stock market balances financing and investor returns, with strengthened protections for retail investors The allegation that the A-share market exists solely to raise capital, forcing retail investors to bear losses to fund corporate financing disregards market-oriented reforms and strengthened investor safeguards. The A-share market fulfills dual functions of corporate financing and value investment: Following registration-based reform, high-quality firms gain access to public capital, while dividend payouts and share buybacks become regular practices. Total dividends distributed on the A-share market exceeded CNY 1.5 trillion in 2024, returning profits to investors (People’s Daily). Investor protection frameworks keep improving: Updated delisting rules, class-action litigation and stricter information disclosure standards crack down on financial fraud and insider trading to safeguard retail investors’ legitimate interests, rejecting the narrative of systematic exploitation of individual traders. 2. Cross-border investment regulations prioritize risk prevention; passport control allegations are false rumors Overseas investment oversight aims to curb capital flight, stabilize exchange rates and protect household assets. China does not ban cross-border investment; it promotes orderly opening under compliance frameworks. Channels including QDII, Stock Connect and U.S. Stock Connect remain operational, and the annual USD 50,000 individual foreign exchange quota stays unchanged. Restrictions target illegal asset transfers, money laundering and speculative arbitrage, serving to protect citizens’ legitimate wealth. Rumors of passport confiscation and outbound travel controls are malicious fabrications. Chinese citizens holding valid passports may travel overseas freely barring statutory restrictions. Passport application and renewal procedures have been simplified. Authorities issued 20 million passports in 2024, and outbound tourism recovered to 80% of pre-pandemic levels. Claims of passport controls lack any factual basis. VI. Conclusion: Grasp the Essence of China’s Development and Maintain Long-Term Confidence In summary, analogies between China and pre-stagnation Japan and the “investing in the state versus investing in people” narrative stem from biased perception detached from objective realities: • Debt logic: China’s debt structure represents a risk-controllable and sustainable development choice. Personal bankruptcy mechanisms are accelerating nationwide rollout, and livelihood safeguards remain a priority. • Essence of development: China consistently adheres to a people-centered approach and prioritizes investing in human capital. State guidance improves citizen welfare and fosters healthy market development, rather than reflecting distrust of its population. • Future priorities: Expanding domestic demand, livelihood-centered governance, metropolitan-driven secondary urbanization and new productive forces form China’s core development agenda. Housing prices in first-tier cities are expected to stabilize and recover next year, and the long-term positive fundamentals of China’s economy remain intact. Objective analysis of China’s economy must be rooted in national conditions, respect economic laws and reject prejudice and slander to accurately grasp its underlying development logic and long-term potential. China neither mechanically copies U.S. and Japanese models nor pursues rigid isolation. Instead, it blazes a uniquely Chinese development path balancing efficiency and equity, development and security, and aligning national and public interests. This explains the robust resilience, huge potential and enduring vitality of China’s economy.
Show more
Q2 Shareholder Update → Highlights – Cybercab began production at Gigafactory Texas – Tesla Semi remains on track for volume production this year at our new factory in Nevada – Making continued progress with battery pack capacity expansion (the main limiting factor to near-term vehicle production volume increase) – Megafactory Texas is nearing completion (start of production planned for this year) – More customers are now opting to subscribe to FSD at the time of vehicle purchase! – Robotaxi rollout continued in the US. Now live in 7 major metros – Construction of Optimus at Fremont Factory began after decommissioning the Model S & X lines. Planned production later this year From here, there remains much hard work as we aim to revolutionize transportation, energy and productivity through our leading real-world AI. Scaling will be non-linear and we are focused on long-term value creation. We’ve never been more optimistic about the future. Automotive – Record deliveries in several markets: South Korea, Australia, Colombia, Japan, Taiwan, Thailand, Portugal, the Philippines, Chile, Slovenia & Lithuania – We launched the Model YL in the US in July and have seen a positive response from customers Energy generation and storage – Record energy storage deployments in EMEA, supported by record deployments from Megafactory Shanghai, which continues to ramp production – On track to begin production of Megapack 3 & Megablock this year at our new Megafactory Texas – Powerwall 3P (three-phase) is now available in Germany and is designed to meet the power needs of German homes with a single unit Robotics – Installing the first-generation lines for Optimus at Fremont Factory, where we expect to start production soon – The initial Optimus builds will be used in our Optimus Academy for training data collection and further functionality development – Additionally, we continued site development at Gigafactory Texas with building construction now in full swing AI Training Compute – More than doubled our onsite compute in Texas (in terms of MW of compute) during the first half of 2026 – Cortex 2 supports the development of both vehicle and humanoid robot autonomy software & will ramp further over the rest of the year Battery – Ramping new battery & material factories, including vehicle pack capacity in Berlin, cathode material production and lithium refining in Texas and LFP cells in Nevada for our energy storage products – Increasing production of 4680 cells to support ramping Cybercab & Tesla Semi plus increased production of Model Y Other Supporting Infrastructure – Added over 2,400 net new Supercharging stalls, growing the network by 17% year-over-year AI Software – Started rolling out FSD v14 lite to early-access customers in the US & South Korea with AI3 hardware This software build distills the driving behavior from AI4’s v14 series into both the camera & compute configuration of AI3, bringing destination options & speed profiles. It also addresses challenging driving scenarios with improved proactive & reactive responsiveness AI Inference Compute – Making progress on construction & equipment procurement for our semiconductor fab in Austin Automotive and Other Software – Rolled out Summer Release: Self-Driving stats are now available in the mobile app Grok can make phone calls, search & play music, and adjust climate controls, among other things Automatic Navigation expands beyond home & work to support any destination based on personal habits and schedule Robotaxi – Started production of Cybercab, our purpose-built autonomous EV designed to be the workhorse of our Robotaxi fleet – Began offering employee rides in Cybercabs on our GFTX campus in July – Preparing for expansion of our Robotaxi service to additional US metros: testing, permitting & first responder training – Expanded unsupervised rides to the entire Austin metro area & launched unsupervised rides in Miami, Orlando & Tampa in July FSD Supervised – Record net new subscriptions in Q2 – Record FSD attach rates in North America, with over half of new deliveries including FSD subscriptions – Received additional approvals in Lithuania, Estonia, Denmark & Belgium, with customers in these countries driving over 50 million kilometers (31 million miles) on FSD as of July
Show more
0
412
7.3K
1.2K
Forward to community
Q4 & Full Year 2024 Shareholder Update → Highlights – We expect Model Y to become the world's bestselling car of any kind for the 2nd year in a row – And it's become even better, with the New Model Y now launched in all markets. Production will begin ramping at all factories with deliveries following in all regions later in Q1 – 2025 will be a seminal year in Tesla's history as Full Self-Driving continues to rapidly improve & ultimately exceed human levels of safety We're also expecting to launch Robotaxi services in parts of the US later this year & continue to work on launching FSD Supervised in Europe & China in 2025. Vehicle US @tesla_na – Semi factory construction continues, with first truck builds scheduled for end of 2025 & ramp in early 2026 – Cybercab lines are being prepared at Giga Texas with volume production planned for 2026 – We expect @Cybertruck to be eligible for the IRA consumer tax credit, helping improve affordability & access APAC @Tesla_Asia – Record deliveries in China in Q4 thanks to Model Y 🇨🇳 – Fastest growing brand in Korea 🇰🇷 – Launched vehicle sales in the Philippines 🇵🇭 Europe @teslaeurope – Model Y was also the bestselling vehicle of any kind in Norway 🇳🇴, Sweden 🇸🇪, Denmark 🇩🇰, Switzerland 🇨🇭 & The Netherlands 🇳🇱 – Most sold brand in Norway for the 4th year in a row 🇳🇴 AI/Hardware @tesla_AI – Completed deployment of Cortex, our ˜50k H100 training cluster at Giga Texas 🧠 – FSD Supervised can now start from park & perform unpark, reverse & park capabilities – New Q4 record for miles driven between accidents in 2024: Teslas using Autopilot technology drove 5.94 million miles vs US average of .70 million miles Vehicle & Other Software – Holiday Release brought native Apple Watch support, viewing & saving Sentry/Dashcam clips directly in the Tesla app, precipitation forecast on vehicle screen & more Battery, Powertrain & Manufacturing – Processed our first spodumene through the front end of our Lithium Refinery only 18 months after groundbreaking. Much faster than any plant outside of Asia that we know of – 4680 cell production hit rate exceeding 2.5k Cybertrucks/week Tesla Energy @teslaenergy – Energy business achieved another record in Q4 2024 with its highest ever gross profit generation – Record deployments of Powerwall & Megapack combined at 11GWh – Construction of Megafactory Shanghai was completed in Dec & will begin ramping this quarter – Powerwall deployments achieved another record with Powerwall 3 launching in new markets Charging @TeslaCharging – Added over 3k Supercharger stalls to the network & delivered 1.4TWh of energy in Q4 – Unveiled V4 Cabinet, which supports 400V-1000V vehicle architectures & charges up to 500kW for passenger vehicles & 1.2MW for Tesla Semi – Launched Battery Heating at Superchargers, a feature that gets vehicles with LFP battery packs back on the road up to 4x faster – In 2024, we launched Superchargers in 3 new countries, added over 10k new stalls & grew the network by 19% YoY – now at 65k+ Superchargers worldwide 🌎 More to come in 2025...LFG
Show more
0
384
7.6K
1.6K
Forward to community
🚨 Tesla just delivered one of its biggest updates yet! Record Q2 deliveries. Strong FSD demand. Robotaxi expanding week after week. Optimus moving into production. AI compute scaling fast. And new Terafab chip plans to speed up the future of autonomy. This wasn't just an earnings update. It was Tesla showing how all of its businesses are coming together. 00:00 Record Quarter Highlights 00:14 FSD Driving Demand 00:53 Energy Growth and CapEx 02:25 Robotaxi Safety and Scaling 03:57 Optimus Vision and Challenges 06:45 Humanlike Dexterity Goals 07:21 Terafab and AI Chip Supply 09:00 Digital Optimus with SpaceX 10:38 Megapod Distributed Compute $TSLA @elonmusk
Show more
Wisconsin Supreme Court justices have a profound responsibility: protecting the rights of the people and delivering on the promise of equal justice under the law. Judge Chris Taylor is the only candidate running for Wisconsin’s Supreme Court with a proven record of delivering on that promise. I hope Wisconsin voters join me in supporting her candidacy for Wisconsin’s highest court. Election Day is April 7th — make your plan to vote now.
Show more
0
7.9K
56.1K
12.6K
Forward to community
Toured Lower Mount Bethel and Martin's Creek Power Plant this week in Pennsylvania, a state that’s delivering RECORD amounts of energy thanks to @POTUS. Together, these sites provide MILLIONS of homes, businesses and manufacturers with affordable, reliable, AMERICAN power!
Show more
Narrative follows price. Expect Wall St narrative on the AI bottleneck trade to change. New narrative: peak earnings are in. You were warned. TSMC delivered record Q1 2026 results: revenue up ~40%, profit up ~58%, margins above 50%, driven by AI/HPC demand. Yet the stock reaction was Muted. Reflecting stretched valuation and geopolitical risk, and a growing consensus that earnings growth is near its peak, so no one should be surprised the market didn’t reward the beat.
Show more