How do AI agents utilize stablecoin settlement? Imagine an AI agent managing an e-commerce treasury: • Receives payments in yield-bearing stablecoins. • Automatically routes funds to cover supplier invoices. • Allocates surplus cash into high-grade tokenized treasuries for daily yield. On SVPChain, AI agents execute this entire cash flow chain autonomously using native stablecoin settlement rails—zero human intervention needed. 🤖💸 #TreasuryManagement# #Fintech# #AgenticEconomy#

Treasury management built for protocols ✅Stake and earn yield ✅Access to covered call strategies ✅Access OTC execution for spot and options ✅Hedge against volatility through collars and protective puts Start with what you’re holding and let's put your treasury to work Let’s map out your strategy:

MemeCore Foundation Statement US$10M+ Strategic Treasury Buyback Program We are aware of the recent market volatility and the concerns raised by our community. Following a comprehensive internal and on-chain review, we have not identified any confirmed issues within MemeCore. Our review confirms: - No issues affecting the protocol or infrastructure. - All core systems continue to operate normally. - No token sales were conducted by the MemeCore Foundation. - No unusual activity has been identified regarding the Foundation's treasury or project operations. Based on the information currently available, we cannot attribute the recent market movement to any specific source. However, we observed that certain sell-side orders entered the market within a short period of time. Rather than being executed through normal limit-order trading, these orders were primarily executed as market orders, resulting in heightened short-term price volatility. Strategic Treasury Buyback Program Although this event was not caused by the MemeCore Foundation, we remain fully committed to the long-term sustainability of the MemeCore ecosystem. Accordingly, the Foundation has approved a Strategic Treasury Buyback Program of at least US$10 million. This initiative forms part of the Foundation's long-term Treasury Management and Ecosystem Support strategy and is intended to: - Support the long-term sustainability of the MemeCore ecosystem - Optimize the Foundation's treasury allocation - Reinforce long-term ecosystem development To preserve market integrity and minimize front-running or speculative trading, the Foundation will not disclose the timing, execution method, or schedule of the buyback. The buyback may have already commenced or may be implemented progressively over time. The Foundation reserves the right to adjust the execution pace, frequency, and amount of each transaction based on market conditions and treasury management considerations. All repurchased tokens will be transferred to the Foundation's treasury wallet: 0xf0Fe619A8A8C3e65966EEf2E447aD1d54a13C511 Looking Ahead This event has only strengthened our commitment to building a more resilient MemeCore ecosystem. In parallel, we are actively preparing additional strategic initiatives to further support the long-term growth of MemeCore. Further updates will be shared through our official channels as appropriate. We sincerely appreciate the continued trust and support of our community. Disclaimer This announcement reflects the Foundation's current understanding based on the information available at the time of publication. The Strategic Treasury Buyback Program is part of the Foundation's treasury management and ecosystem development strategy. It should not be interpreted as investment advice, a guarantee of future performance, or any commitment regarding token price. Digital asset markets remain highly volatile, and neither the Foundation nor any affiliated party guarantees future market performance.

Did Michael Saylor just break the golden rule of Bitcoin? 🤯📉 Strategy just disclosed the sale of 1,638 BTC for $104.73 million—reopening the massive debate: is the "never sell" era officially over? The latest KuCoin blog breaks down the corporate shift from pure accumulation to active treasury management: 💼 Corporate vs. Personal: While Michael Saylor clarified he hasn't sold a single personal satoshi, Strategy's board has officially authorized ongoing BTC monetization. 💵 Funding the Machine: The $104.73M in proceeds wasn't a bearish exit—it was split to fund preferred-stock dividends and buy back STRC preferred shares at a discount. 🔄 Active Treasury Management: Bitcoin is no longer treated as permanently untouchable corporate capital. It is now an operational liquidity tool used to stabilize the company's complex financial structure. 📊 Market Reaction: The Bitcoin market easily absorbed the 0.19% treasury reduction, showing the strategic signal matters far more than the immediate sell pressure. Why flexibility is the new ultimate strategy for corporate Bitcoin whales. Read the full analysis here:

Stablecoin Insider Co-Founder @chrmrto has been recognized by Stablecon as one of the most influential people in the global stablecoin ecosystem by @thestablecon. Since launching Stablecoin Insider, Chiara has helped establish the publication as a trusted source covering stablecoin regulation, enterprise adoption, treasury management, cross-border payments, tokenization, and the evolving digital dollar ecosystem. Read more at

Bitcoin as collateral is becoming an institutional conversation. Join @RootstockLabs for a live webinar with Tommy Doyle, Head of CCG & Institutional at @xapobankapp, to explore $BTC backed liquidity, treasury management, and financing use cases for Bitcoin-native companies. Sign up: For eligible institutional or qualified counterparties only.

Vitalik Backs EF Layoffs, Citing Promising Transition Vitalik Buterin (@VitalikButerin) announced that the Ethereum Foundation (@ethereumfndn) is reducing its budget by roughly 40% this year. The move follows last year’s Treasury Management Policy, shifting the EF from spending about 15% of its funds annually to a long-term endowment model targeting just 5% per year after 2030. He openly acknowledged the human cost, praising the brilliant, dedicated engineers, some with nearly a decade of protocol work, who are leaving. Rather than claiming painless efficiency gains, Vitalik detailed deliberate strategic sacrifices to sustain ambitious progress. In the meantime, the EF will continue the Ethereum Strawmap, its third major iteration covering consensus, proofs, privacy, and more, while expanding its Access Layer role.

This year, the EF is decreasing its budget by roughly 40%, which entails some difficult decisions. The goal of the decreases was set out in the Treasury Management Policy last year: the EF is transitioning into being a long-term-oriented endowment-based organization, shifting from its pre-2026 average of spending ~15% of its remaining funds each year, toward a post-2030 target of ~5% per year. Often, when an organization goes through something like this, people try to pretend that nothing of great value was lost, that it is an efficiency increase, that the only people cut are unproductive dead weight, and everyone else stopped partying, studied the blade, entered cracked S-tier beast mode, and this was sufficient to make up for the downside. I will not try to pretend this. I respect my EF colleagues far too much to pretend that there was not much that is lost. They are brilliant people. They are dedicated engineers of whom some have worked on the Ethereum protocol for nearly a decade. They have brought a bright light to the Ethereum ecosystem with their code, their words, their warmth as human beings and their actions. My dearest hope is that they find a path that brings them fulfillment and happiness whether inside Ethereum or outside. Hopefully many will be able to bring their excellent talents and mindset to the wider Ethereum ecosystem, or the even wider CROPS world. Instead, I will try to explain what *are* some of the grand sacrifices being made. The Ethereum Strawmap is no small thing. It is an extremely ambitious undertaking seeking to replace and augment almost every part of the protocol - consensus, proofs, privacy, account model, state, and more. This is the third iteration of Ethereum, in the same way that the Merge was the second, even if the shipping style is less Big Bang and more one-piece-at-a-time. On top of this, the EF is increasing its role in the Access Layer. We are not compromising on Ethereum being a Deeply Impressive protocol, something worthy of its place in a world with quantum computing, rockets to Mars and powerful biotech and AI, and capable of meeting the challenges that this era will bring. Some of the deficit will be recovered through more work happening outside the EF. But not all. So what are the grand sacrifices that will enable a leaner effort to accomplish all of this? I will give a few examples (though far from an exhaustive list): * The multi-client model will shift in the direction of multiple clients existing less for _redundancy_, and more for _specialization_. Up to this point, redundancy has been the main security strategy: if one client has a bug, if it has less than 33%, the chain keeps going and does not even stop finalizing. We are increasingly exploring moving more pieces of the protocol to a different security strategy: AI-assisted formal verification. Some smaller pieces of Ethereum (eg. BLS libraries) have worked this way already for a long time. But soon many more parts of Ethereum will likely function on this model. This may greatly reduce resource requirements of shipping a large number of EIPs. The resources saved by client teams can ideally instead be used to better serve different specialized user needs, including EF Access Layer goals. * PSE (Privacy and Scaling Explorations) is winding down as a unit. The number of people working on ZKPs for privacy and scaling is probably as high as ever, but they are working less on "exploration" and more on *implementing* ZKP-based privacy and scaling into the Protocol and Access Layer * Devcon will likely over time become smaller-scale, somewhat more spartan, much lower-deficit than previous years, in addition to other changes in vision in line with the Mandate. * Fewer beyond-Ethereum megaprojects coming from EF. As I announced earlier this year, I am taking on some of the responsibility of doing projects in this category that I consider valuable with my personal funds. * EF institutional work is reducing in scope, specializing more specifically on creating replicable test cases of highly CROPS-friendly deployments, even if at smaller scale. These do not explain all departures; in some cases they do not explain departures at all and rather explain _reduced need for new spending_. But they are a large part of the strategy at play. In the longer term, I personally favor a "soft lean-and-done" approach to Ethereum: once the Strawmap is completed, generally stick to security fixes and small high-value changes, and have a much higher bar for considering new feature additions to the protocol. This allows Ethereum to remain capture-resistant without demanding very large budgets. Learn less from multimillion-line-of-code behemoth projects, more from bitcoin. The past years have been a challenging era for Ethereum. However, the ecosystem is adapting, both inside the EF and outside, and I am confident that Ethereum is very well-positioned to succeed and thrive.