Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

JH
@CRUDEOIL231
PM at the Hedge Fund Arm of Global Physical Commodity Trading House / Macro, Commodities, FICC / Middle and Far East representation / Travelers worldwide
Joined August 2021
325 Following    69.8K Followers
First zero pushback on China finished product demand being cooked. That’s undisputed market reality, whether you look at transport burn or macro proxies. Chinese oil demand is genuinely soft and the broader macro picture is flatlining. Calling domestic demand bearish is the easiest consensus on the street. What does that 5mb/d print actually represent? Price-driven demand destruction, legacy barrels displaced by NEVs, aggressive run cuts, zeroed out SPR bids and ultimately waterborne crude imports rolling over hard. Lumping that all together into a 5mb/d headline makes sense on paper. But as solid analysts have flagged, that entire 5mb/d delta isn’t structural, permanent destruction(yeah i know a slice of that baseline is never coming back post-shock). Which tees up the question: "If domestic demand is dead in the water, why did a sidelined China inevitably have to step back into the prompt market?" That’s the core thesis to solve. Let’s not regurgitate the product export quota narrative. An ~800kb/d G2G allocation to the SOEs doesn't move the needle structurally. And blown out freight rates and physical diffs inflated landing costs—refining cracks aren’t nearly as pristine as paper margins imply. Here’s my fundamental read: no matter how anemic domestic demand looked, stabilizing finished product tanks at these depressed utilization rates was physically impossible. They drew down product inventories—especially the petchem complex—way more aggressively than consensus modeled. Refiners were backed into a corner where they had to ramp runs, forcing Beijing to give the green light to defend absolute inventory floors. This wasn’t 5mb/d of structural demand destruction—it was 5mb/d of artificial "crude" demand suppression. And that suppression was never a forever trade; it was subsidized by cannibalizing downstream tanks. Now it’s time to face physical reality. That’s my bottom line. Again not fighting the consensus on weak domestic demand. But even against a bearish macro backdrop, China couldn't shoulder the burden of subsidizing global price suppression indefinitely. #oott# #iran# #china#
Show more
@CRUDEOIL231 @AyusoValue But dr Anas told us that there’s 5mbbl daily demand destruction is China 🫣