Gad Saad, your argument is juvenile and sophomoric. Invoking Richard Dawkins and declaring that evolution has more evidence than gravity is not scientific methodology. It is an appeal to authority dressed up as intellectual superiority. You have not addressed the fundamental questions. What is the origin of existence itself? What accounts for the laws governing the universe? What is the ultimate source of human consciousness, intelligence, reason, and objective morality? Then explain the historical chronology. If humanity supposedly existed for hundreds of thousands of years, why are the recognizable institutions of civilization, including organized governments, written laws, cities, complex engineering, and administrative systems, concentrated within the last several thousand years? Do not merely recite a timeline. Explain the evidence, the methodology, and why the conclusions follow. Human beings appear in recorded civilization as intelligent, reasoning, morally accountable creatures capable of extraordinary ingenuity. The biblical account declares that God created humanity in His image, male and female, endowed with the capacities necessary to fulfill His purpose. Adaptation to environmental and climatic conditions does not, by itself, establish that humanity descended from a different ancestral species. Nor does identifying biological mechanisms explain why life, consciousness, rationality, or moral obligation exists in the first place. You cannot invoke natural laws and then pretend that those laws have explained their own existence. Nor can you establish that the universe is unguided merely by describing processes within it. Genesis declares that God created. Your theory of unguided origins has not disproved Him. If you want to debate science, present evidence and defend your reasoning. Stop confusing ridicule, authority, and philosophical naturalism with scientific proof.