🚨 The vaccine should NEVER kill more than the infection — and this is exactly why vaccine companies should not have protection from liability. Official CDC/FDA data presented by epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher shows HUNDREDS of sudden deaths in infants and toddlers within days of MMR vaccination — SIDS, cardiac arrest, encephalitis — amounting to 2,657% MORE reported deaths than measles itself since 1995.193 VAERS death reports vs only 7 confirmed measles deaths. Over half under age 2. 25% hospitalized. Most within 1–2 weeks of the shot. A vaccine that reports killing far more children than the disease it targets has no business being shielded from liability. @NicHulscher

When I was in the hospital, the emergency room was a complete nightmare. They treated patients like cattle. All of the good nurses treating Covid patients quit or were fired because they would not take the vaccine.

To every single one of you who subscribe and support my research: You are the real Most Valuable People. Your support doesn’t just help — it powers every late night, every hard question, and every step forward. I couldn’t do this without you. Thank you for believing in the work and being the backbone of it all. Let’s keep discovering together. 🚀

Alexander Vindman leaked a transcript of the phone call Trump had with Zelenskyy, to intel officials, then reported it to W.H Atty's in order to cover his tracks They used it to impeach Trump His wife Rachel was linked to ActBlue, and posted concerns over not being pardoned There is no statute of limitations on Conspiracy.... Vindman must stand trial for this

Almost every older person I know is taking many pills and they still feel sick everyday. I wonder why? Those pills are making them sick with their horrible side effects. After a certain age everyone is put on statins, it is criminal what they are doing. Our medical system is corrupt and broken.

Notice a trend? Hasan Piker Parents: Turkey Abdul El-Sayed Parents: Egypt Zohran Mamdani Parents: India Ilhan Omar Parents: Somalia The Left’s new leaders have parents who immigrated to America. But still hate it. No longer hiding a goal to destroy America and the West.

🚨 $236 BILLION IN FRAUD  JD Vance just dropped the hammer. A fraud task force uncovered $236 billion, and he says that’s only the tip of the iceberg. El-Sayed and the socialists? They want to fight the anti-fraud effort. They call it racist and xenophobic. Vance’s response: “I don’t care what your name is. If you’re committing fraud against the American people, throw you in prison.” Working-class people don’t want their tax dollars funding fraudulent Somali day cares or scammers instead of actual young moms and babies. The socialists don’t care about that. They care about protecting the scam. Limousine socialists every time.

To every single one of you who subscribe and support my research: You are the real Most Valuable People. Your support doesn’t just help — it powers every late night, every hard question, and every step forward. I couldn’t do this without you. Thank you for believing in the work and being the backbone of it all. Let’s keep discovering together. 🚀

🚨 THIS MAN IS 100% RIGHT — AND IT SHOULD TERRIFY YOU Our medical system is FALLING APART. People are finally waking up to the truth after COVID. It’s NEVER been about curing you. It’s about keeping you sick, managing symptoms for life, and collecting the profits. Toxic pills. Lifelong patients. Zero restoration of health. High blood pressure. Arthritis. Diabetes. Managed… never fixed. We are in a full-blown national health crisis — and the system is the disease. Watch this. Let it sink in. Then ask yourself: How much longer are we going to accept this hoax?

✝️ CHRISTIANS LISTEN UP! ✝️ CHRISTIANS, or nonbelievers, are to be conquered or subjugated, per the Quran. According to the Quran, Christians (and other “People of the Book”) who do not accept Islam are to be fought until they submit, pay the jizya (tribute/tax), and are subdued. ———————————- Reference: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture — [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.” — Quran 9:29 (Sahih International)

O’Reilly predicts Fauci will be in court for the next 5 years or so, fighting state charges. IMO, he should be in court for the rest of his life, if not imprisoned before that.

Legal Specialists Preview Upcoming SCOTUS Cases On ‘Assault Weapons’ Bans Blue states try a myriad of ways to go after our 2A rights by... - Limiting the size of magazines - Banning the sale of gun parts - Banning certain guns - Limiting ammunition sales - Demanding costly firearm training - Restricting conceal carry licenses - Restricting where you can carry (gun free zones) - Limiting who you can sell/transfer gun ownership to ...and on and on. Much of this will probably continue even if SCOTUS rules against gun bans. The best defense is to vote in pro 2A candidates to state and local gov't to protect your rights. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ‘But it would be frankly shocking to me if there were not attempts by these states after … a likely, hopeful victory here for AR-15s to get around by just making it difficult.’ Williams opined that “it’s entirely possible you could see these connected in this decision” because “it’s really kind of hard to separate the magazine out from the firearm to the extent that an AR-15 comes with a standard magazine; it’s generally a 30-round magazine.” He furthermore noted these guns’ wide use among the American public. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From the article: The U.S. Supreme Court is gearing up to weigh another big Second Amendment issue in its upcoming term — a matter legal specialists say will greatly affect Americans’ constitutional rights. During a Tuesday Federalist Society forum, Notre Dame Law School Professor Haley Proctor and American Suppressor Association General Counsel Michael Williams offered viewers a sneak preview into what’s at stake in Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins. The pair of consolidated cases — which deal with the legality of laws banning AR-15s and similar semiautomatic firearms — will be heard by the high court in its October 2026 term. The two panelists began by laying the foundation of the Supreme Court’s existing Second Amendment jurisprudence, which included a discussion of its 2022 NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. In Bruen, the majority (6-3) recognized that Americans have a constitutional right to carry firearms outside the home for purposes of self-defense. The Bruen ruling established a two-step test lower courts are to use when assessing restrictions on firearm possession. The majority said courts must first assess whether the regulated conduct is covered by the Second Amendment’s plain text, and if so, determine if that regulation is consistent with the nation’s “historical tradition of firearm regulation.” Turning to Viramontes and Grant, Williams observed how the 2nd and 7th Courts of Appeals effectively failed to properly adopt Bruen‘s two-step framework when considering the challenges to the respective laws. In Viramontes, Williams noted that the 7th Circuit “essentially stops the argument at step one” by analogizing AR-15s to “automatic weapons” like M-16s, which it found are “presumptively not covered by the Second Amendment” under existing SCOTUS precedent. Meanwhile, in Grant, he said that the 2nd Circuit focused more on the second step by accepting Connecticut’s “historical analogues” regarding bans on “certain types of knives” and “machine guns,” and started “to slip closer and closer” to a framework rejected by the Supreme Court in Bruen. The attorneys also considered the possibility that the Supreme Court may address the lawfulness of restrictions on gun-magazine size in its decision. The sole question agreed to by the justices is whether the Second and 14th Amendments “guarantee the right to possess AR-15 platform and similar semiautomatic rifles.” Williams opined that “it’s entirely possible you could see these connected in this decision” because “it’s really kind of hard to separate the magazine out from the firearm to the extent that an AR-15 comes with a standard magazine; it’s generally a 30-round magazine.” He furthermore noted these guns’ wide use among the American public. Proctor expressed uncertainty on whether the high court will handle the magazine issue in Viramontes and Grant, “especially now that there is a circuit [court] split” on the question. She noted there’s always a chance, however. “One possibility is that they decide Viramontes and send it back to the lower courts to try again with the standard capacity magazine bans,” Proctor said. “What … separates these out is the question of the definition of arms. … [Wolford v. Lopez] shows pretty well that the [Bruen] step-one questions are fairly well-settled. But that is still one area in the magazine cases where lower courts are trying to crack open the step-one analysis. And we see that in the back-and-forth in the 9th Circuit’s decision on large-capacity magazines in the Duncan case.” “So, hopefully we’ll get some sort of clarification in Viramontes even if the court doesn’t take up the magazine issue on how the arms analysis is meant to proceed,” she added. In Wolford, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Hawaii’s “vampire rule” restricting concealed-carry holders’ ability to carry on private property open to the public to be unconstitutional. The majority held that the state’s gun control “regime” — which was adopted to seemingly sidestep Bruen — “hobble[d] what the Second Amendment protects: the right of Americans to carry arms for self-defense as they go about their daily lives.” While signaling the Supreme Court would likely deem the AR-15 restrictions in Viramontes and Grant to be unlawful, Proctor and Williams indicated they wouldn’t be surprised if states with these laws effectively try to circumvent a positive ruling. Williams compared such behavior to the “mass resistance” among Southern states to the high court’s Brown v. Board of Education (1954) decision nuking state-enforced segregation. “There’s a Supreme Court case that comes out; a certain number of states do not like that outcome; and they’re doing everything in their power to get out from under it, with a little bit of help from some lower courts who haven’t quite wrapped their minds around this test and this issue yet. … But it would be frankly shocking to me if there were not attempts by these states after … a likely, hopeful victory here for AR-15s to get around by just making it difficult,” Williams said. Towards the end of the panel, the two participants also flagged several gun-related issues that are likely to come down the Supreme Court’s pipeline in the coming years. Proctor highlighted legal battles over bans on firearm possession for 18 to 20-year-olds and felons, while Williams pointed to existing restrictions on suppressors and remaining commerce clause questions involving gun regulation. A date for oral arguments in Viramontes and Grant has not been announced. Link to article in comments

Almost every older person I know is taking many pills and they still feel sick everyday. I wonder why? Those pills are making them sick with their horrible side effects. After a certain age everyone is put on statins, it is criminal what they are doing. Our medical system is corrupt and broken.