Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

Fiachra (Fiki) 马骏
@FiachraRM
大道至简 | full stack designer & founder | posting about design, human-computer interaction & AI | Currently building Chengyu Calendar 🗓️👇🏻
3.2K Following    2.3K Followers
Every time I watch a @pzayap demo, I laugh - they’re always so fun!
@pzayap kept switching between tutorials and his work, so he built shy window it floats a website over your workspace and disappears when you need to see behind it. can see myself using this with documentation open all day
Show more
t taste. of home topreserve her mum’s cooking, including figuring out what “$2 worth of chilli” means in a recipe the agak-agak instructions, photos and recordings all go in. a lovely way to keep the food you grew up with
Show more
spent the evening at singapore product design’s sidequest xp party at OGP. five demos, then a panel on finding your feet in design with ai changing so much small recap: some of what people shared below. thanks @woshiqijie, the SPD volunteers and ogp for having us!
Show more
So cool to meet the legend @PhilHedayatnia tonight. Very excited to meet the forthcoming !
@PhilHedayatnia showed meld, which saves design references along with the fonts, colours and why you liked them that context can go to an ai agent. he also demoed a voice agent for user research, with the designer deciding which feedback matters
Show more
Thanks @brianchew for always giving the best summations of events!
@FiachraRM made chengyu calendar, a chinese idiom a day on a little tear-off calendar you can tear the pages, flip through old ones and read where each idiom came from. even the paper edges look affected by humidity. the details are so good
Show more
Enjoyed sharing my lil app tonight at my favourite monthly meet-up in Singapore, Singapore Product Design!
After insane amount of experimentation with different formats across social media platforms, TikTok marketing for my new app seems to be gradually taking off. We are so back 🚀
Show more
Threads marketing is a hard nut to crack… Gonna spend a bit more time on TikTok to see if I can find more momentum on there
Crazy how I do most of my coding via my iPhone now
Hope Siri can get intelligent enough to know I *never* make phone calls
*always* debug in a fresh context window, otherwise it’s gonna get messy
Started playing with metal in the last month and it’s insanely fun
Todo apps should be significantly affected by this, but Todoist has broken records for both revenue and usage, and our growth has reaccelerated. I'm not saying things won't change in the industry, but software is far from dead. I think much of AI's value will move to the app layer.
Show more
“Have you ever wanted to make an app?”, promoters of AI products often rhetorically ask. If they listened to most consumers, they’d discover the answer to that is actually “no.” Most (not all !) consumers just want to buy something that solves their problem right away. They don’t want to think of a prompt, they don’t want to write a prompt to generate something for them. They want to see what’s on the shelf, ready made, and buy it.
Show more
I’m really trying to pretend this is true so RC doesn’t get steamrolled, but the more I think about it, the less I buy it. 1. Historically, the production of many types of goods have decreased dramatically in complexity and it didn’t transition to everyone just building it themselves. When electric tools were invented, did everyone transition to making their own furniture? Did the word processor end the book industry? Did the camera end the art industry? None of these quite match what we’re seeing but I haven’t found a case where humans have de-specialized. 2. Most consumers are exactly that, consumers. They are much lower agency than your average software person, probably lower creativity, and aren’t going to start building their own novel solutions to problems all of a sudden. Perhaps the models get so good they can do it somewhat transparently, but that would still require dictating requirements to the models, which itself is not something most consumers will be great at. And part of making “good” software is being opinionated. Models, due to the efforts of alignment, are limited in what they can say no to. The user asks for something that makes the software worse? “You’re absolutely right!” I’m not sure that taste and alignment are fully compatible. 3. Nothing ever happens. I think software will evolve, and what was a successful app three years ago will be very different three years from now, but it just doesn’t seem likely that after 10,000 years of increasing specialization and craftsmanship, humans will just resort to self reliance all of sudden. We want the expert opinion of other humans. We are interested in novel tools and experiences. Software products often bring with them community and identity that won’t go away. I just think an amplified version of the current trajectory more plausible than a complete reversal. Tell me why I’m wrong!
Show more
I’m really trying to pretend this is true so RC doesn’t get steamrolled, but the more I think about it, the less I buy it. 1. Historically, the production of many types of goods have decreased dramatically in complexity and it didn’t transition to everyone just building it themselves. When electric tools were invented, did everyone transition to making their own furniture? Did the word processor end the book industry? Did the camera end the art industry? None of these quite match what we’re seeing but I haven’t found a case where humans have de-specialized. 2. Most consumers are exactly that, consumers. They are much lower agency than your average software person, probably lower creativity, and aren’t going to start building their own novel solutions to problems all of a sudden. Perhaps the models get so good they can do it somewhat transparently, but that would still require dictating requirements to the models, which itself is not something most consumers will be great at. And part of making “good” software is being opinionated. Models, due to the efforts of alignment, are limited in what they can say no to. The user asks for something that makes the software worse? “You’re absolutely right!” I’m not sure that taste and alignment are fully compatible. 3. Nothing ever happens. I think software will evolve, and what was a successful app three years ago will be very different three years from now, but it just doesn’t seem likely that after 10,000 years of increasing specialization and craftsmanship, humans will just resort to self reliance all of sudden. We want the expert opinion of other humans. We are interested in novel tools and experiences. Software products often bring with them community and identity that won’t go away. I just think an amplified version of the current trajectory more plausible than a complete reversal. Tell me why I’m wrong!
Show more
The Stone Age has arrived. 🪨
Glass is out, stone is in. 🪨🤪
Runescapemorphism is so back
“Glass is out, stone is in.” Well, now you can use it. I turned the stone UI concepts into Strata UI, a reusable HTML/CSS framework. Textured stone, carved buttons, recessed fields and light and dark themes, with copyable code for your own projects. Thanks to everyone who jumped in with ideas, feedback and a few good laughs. You gave me a reason to keep building. Free under the MIT license. Download the first preview:
Show more
Threads marketing is a hard nut to crack… Gonna spend a bit more time on TikTok to see if I can find more momentum on there
Context rot is still a thing; clear your context windows whenever you can