.@ClooneyFDN Amal Clooney, as a major supporter of ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan, the moral thing is for you to speak out against his repeated sexual assault of a subordinate female employee — as disclosed by the victim in public for the first time, on CNN:

L: Amnesty International chief Agnes Callamard embraced ICC's Karim Khan long after the sexual abuse charges were known. So did Amnesty UK's Kristyan Benedict. R: Sarah, the young mother who was sexually abused by Karim Khan, gives her first interview. Amnesty are all silent.

BREAKING: U.S. investigating 1,500 UNRWA staff for terrorism. “A U.S. diplomatic official briefed by USAID OIG investigators confirmed current and former 1,500 UNRWA employees are under investigation for ties to foreign terrorist organizations in Gaza.”

It is important to be clear about this ruling. This is only a preliminary injunction issued at an early stage of litigation. The court has not issued a final ruling on the merits of the case, nor has it vindicated your conduct or statements. The decision temporarily pauses enforcement of sanctions while the litigation proceeds. The opinion primarily addresses constitutional and procedural questions, including First Amendment concerns related to sanctions imposed in response to speech. It does not endorse your rhetoric, your conduct as a U.N. official, or the substance of your claims. The underlying concerns about your conduct remain unchanged. You are the first U.N. special rapporteur in history to be formally condemned by numerous democratic governments for Holocaust inversion, antisemitic rhetoric, and gross misconduct. Governments including the United States, France, Germany, Canada, the United Kingdom and others have publicly denounced your statements and conduct. See here: You have repeatedly compared Israelis to Nazis (including last week). You accused the United States of being controlled by the “Jewish lobby.” You minimized and rationalized Hamas terrorism, which you have repeatedly called “resistance.” You turned a U.N. mandate that is supposed to uphold impartial human rights principles into a platform for political activism and extremism. See here: This ruling is not a moral vindication, and it does nothing to restore the credibility that you have squandered through years of inflammatory conduct.