The left really went immediately from “we can’t cancel a multi millionaire comedian for openly gloating over the brutal murder of a young father” to “we must cancel these random white girls for making noises into a ring camera for three seconds.” These are not serious people.

1) If you actually believe that some random college girls made monkey noises as a deliberate slur against black people, you’re too retarded to take seriously. 2) Even if they did (they didn’t), it’s right in line with the kind of racial harassment white people are subjected to literally every day in almost every college, school, or street corner in the country, and it’s not nearly as bad as the black on white murders that get no media outrage or attention of any kind, ever.

George Floyd was a drug addled violent criminal hobo who died of a drug overdose and then was venerated as a literal saint while leftists burned down entire city blocks in revenge. Charlie Kirk was a political commentator who never committed any crimes and was gunned down on camera while speaking peacefully in front of an audience, and nobody responded by rioting or committing any acts of violence or reprisals anywhere at all. So, no, joking about George Floyd is not the same as joking about Charlie Kirk. The two men, and the circumstances around their deaths, and the subsequent reactions, have no resemblance at all. There is no comparison except that they both died, and that's it. Anyone trying to draw this moral equivalency is lying or stupid or both. And any conservative claiming that we have to tolerate the Charlie jokes because we criticized George Floyd is a submissive cucked shill and should be disregarded on this issue and every other.

The Republican congress did nothing. Achieved nothing. Took the mandate they were given and did precisely zero with it. Feckless losers who are relieved to no longer be in the majority. The only thing Republicans do with power is bide their time until they can relinquish it.

The “official narrative” is supported by multiple videos from multiple sources at multiple angles. Not to mention the giant crater in the ground and debris. Plus audio, radar, and literally every other kind of evidence you could possibly want. Yes I believe the official narrative because I’m not retarded. The more interesting question is what exactly motivates people like this to assume that every single event in the world is a carefully orchestrated conspiracy, despite having no direct evidence or even circumstantial evidence for almost any of their theories while flatly rejecting any and all evidence that refutes them. Is it just simply that these people are extremely dumb and, thanks to the internet, we are exposed to a level of human stupidity and lunacy that intelligent and functional people would otherwise never encounter unless they were volunteering at the local homeless shelter? Or is it that, along with being unbelievably stupid, they are also cowards who cannot face the fact that bad things sometimes just happen — actually, very often just happen — and there isn’t some shadowy force carefully arranging and manipulating everything that occurs everywhere in the world at every moment? Or is it that they actually aren’t as stupid and cowardly as they seem but rather they are cynically pretending to be stupid and cowardly for clicks or kicks? Or is it some combination of these three? I think it’s a combination. But who knows.

We have always known that "diverse" just means "no white men" but it's nice to have Spanberger come out and illustrate the point so explicitly. By this definition, six black people and two middle aged white women is "the most diverse cabinet ever seen."

Why exactly is it so obvious when someone is trying to pass off AI writing as their own? There are clear red flags like “quietly” and “load bearing” but there’s also something less tangible in the rhythm and construction that screams AI but is hard to precisely describe. I can tell when something is AI slop but I can’t always tell how I can tell.

When you have kids, older parents will tell you “they grow up fast.” You’ll hear it a million times. Then one day you’ll realize how true it was. The time flies by as your kids get older. The days are short. Years don’t feel like years anymore. It’s bewildering. Impossible to talk about without sounding cliched.

They are treating their algorithms as though they have feelings and moral standing. This is weird as hell. Full on dystopian. Imagine if a car dealership made you sign an agreement that you wouldn’t be unkind or cruel to your vehicle. Batshit insane.

The AI maximalists say that we need AI to do all the jobs so that we can be freed to do more meaningful things like make art and read to our children. But then they also want AI to make art and read to our children. So what exactly will be left for humans to do? The answer, though they won’t admit it, is that we get to be passive consumers sitting around slack jawed staring at screens until we die. That’s the only form of happiness these people can conceive of. It’s all any of us should want, as far as they’re concerned.

This is a guy explaining why it's okay for a father to use AI to read bedtime stories to his children rather than reading the stories himself. This technology is "the future," he says. We don't want to be "left in the dust." This is my whole problem with the AI maximalists. They place zero inherent value on the human experience itself. Even a task like reading to your children is, to these freaks, nothing more than a process of passing information from one party to another. We should use AI because it can do it more efficiently. Even in the realm of bedtime stories, we are somehow locked in a technology race, and if we don't figure out how to be more efficient bed time story readers we will get "left behind" in some vague way. They see no problem with AI "art" for this same reason. Nothing has any meaning. There is no value in the process itself. The human soul does not exist. Just do everything faster and cheaper and produce as much stuff as you can as quickly as you can. That's how they see the world. And I can't quite put into words how much I despise it.

Weird tech guys are busy building technology that will likely put millions of people out of work and upend our lives in unprecedented ways — a change that nobody voted for, and few of us want or will benefit from — and somehow so many people on the Right have chosen the “this is fine, let’s allow the tech guys who hate us to do whatever the hell they want and transform society in whatever way they prefer while they become trillionaires and everyone else loses everything” side of the debate. Perhaps the most extraordinarily stupid political miscalculation of all time. We’re supposed to be the ones who actually value human life and the human experience.

The public school system is irreparably broken and useless now primarily because it refuses to admit that kids like this cannot be fixed, cannot be reformed, and normal civilized children should not be forced to share a class with them

6-year-old after shooting his teacher: “Fuck you, nigga. Shut the fuck up, ho. I stole dat gun from my mama. I don’t care if I go to jail.” This person cannot be rehabilitated and is guaranteed to kill in the future. This mother and absent father deserve the death penalty.