🚨 Day 2 update, continued.. 🚨 The state continued its questioning of the first witness, the father of the 10-year-old child (who was 9 at the time of the incident). Two interpreters were required, rotating every 30 minutes. The father testified that he works as a bus driver (odd given that he does not speak English and bus drivers typically need a driver’s license with English proficiency requirements.) The viral video was then played for the jury and the courtroom. After laborious, often repetitive and seemingly coached questioning by the state, the father eventually stated that he saw his son take an item from Shiloh’s belongings. He said Shiloh chased after the boy, and he believed she was pursuing him not only to retrieve her property but also to “rumble” with or strike him. Just as defense attorney Brian Karalus began his cross-examination, the clock approached 5:00 p.m. and the judge adjourned for the day.