I've tried to keep my discourse on X regarding this situation in private DMs with the higher ups at riot (which have been extremely kind, patient and understanding), but now with @ItsGamerDoc resorting to DM'ing blatant lies to everyone to avoid getting fact checked by the public, I have to say something. Gamerdoc follows me title to title doing this exact same thing, and after I was nothing but open minded towards him and his boss when they severely and legally fucked up for @riotgames, he still finds ways to be petty and targets me game to game through other devs, these private DMs prove exactly that. I have received the message loud and clear @ItsGamerDoc. Let me ask you this @ItsGamerDoc, weren't you just posting and using mental health to victimize yourself to get out of this situation and your mistake, but still have the nerve to pump disinformation into everyone's private DMs since you know you would get fact checked and cooked publicly? To add, there is clearly a misuse of power going on in these departments, in order to save face when these devs are wrong, they use out of context backend information to twist narratives with falsehoods publicly, and now, through individual people's DMs just to justify and cover up their mistakes. They can *never* be wrong, that drew levin apology was clearly just a ploy to give credibility to their next lie, which is being done now, they have now moved the goalpost on the ban reason multiple times instead of admitting that they were and are wrong about the intention of it all. Imagine if we didn’t have vods or clips, imagine all the off stream players falsely punished because of power tripping ego maniacs, ***they are clearly willing to lie to be right***, even now WITH the vod footage they are still trying to tell us and the world what our intention was and still is despite the contradicting evidence, and normally, without access to the backend these users and/or streamers receiving this information could never refute their blatant injection of disinformation. This is a direct example of targeting and a misuse of power.

Why am I being banned for playing with friends through your own 5 stack system? You keep disingenuously misrepresenting what happened to justify the unfair and harsh punishment for something out of my control. I was playing with friends live on stream, 95% of the players in all of my stacks were on their main accounts, for the ones that weren't, how can I know that it wasn't an account they leveled up on their own? @RiotK3o stated that it is "generally ok for players to play on alt accounts so as long as they level it up themselves". Thus, what you are implying with these comments, insinuating that I had to know that he was on an alt he didn't level up on his own, is my point exactly. You are proving the targeting and the bias by insinuating that I had to know without you actually knowing that. Why are you attempting to read my mind and tell me what I should know or can't not know. This is the exact problem the community and I are alluding to. You can't push this "rules are rules" narrative on one hand, then on the other hand, pick and choose who you give the benefit of the doubt to, and who you don't based on non-objective judgements of the individual.

Why am I being banned for playing with friends through your own 5 stack system? You keep disingenuously misrepresenting what happened to justify the unfair and harsh punishment for something out of my control. I was playing with friends live on stream, 95% of the players in all of my stacks were on their main accounts, for the ones that weren't, how can I know that it wasn't an account they leveled up on their own? @RiotK3o stated that it is "generally ok for players to play on alt accounts so as long as they level it up themselves". Thus, what you are implying with these comments, insinuating that I had to know that he was on an alt he didn't level up on his own, is my point exactly. You are proving the targeting and the bias by insinuating that I had to know without you actually knowing that. Why are you attempting to read my mind and tell me what I should know or can't not know. This is the exact problem the community and I are alluding to. You can't push this "rules are rules" narrative on one hand, then on the other hand, pick and choose who you give the benefit of the doubt to, and who you don't based on non-objective judgements of the individual.