Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

cv usk
@cv_usk
AI / Software Research Notes AI Agent, LLMOps, MLOps, Software Architecture ๆŠ•็จฟใฏๅ€‹ไบบใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ใงใ™ใ€‚
Joined May 2026
285 Following    451 Followers
Practices for embedding AI agents into enterprise systems [Prompt Supply Chain Management] ๐Ÿ’ก Has a "quiet prompt tweak" ever changed production behavior unexpectedly? This pattern treats prompts as code artifacts -- versioned, reviewed, signed, and eval-gated before deployment. ๐Ÿ”ฅ Problems it solves - Prompt changes cannot be tracked or reviewed, making it impossible to identify the cause of quality regressions - External inputs injected into prompt templates cause unintended behavior - No way to trace which prompt version produced a given result, destroying reproducibility ๐Ÿ—๏ธ Proposed pattern Manage prompts in Git with a dedicated registry. Require pull requests and code reviews for every change. Mandate eval gate passage on each update, automatically running quality checks against a golden dataset. Sign production-deployed prompts for tamper detection. Apply injection countermeasures -- delimiters, sanitization, and least-privilege scoping -- to all template variable insertion points. In essence, apply the same CI/CD quality process used for software to your prompts. โœ… Selection criteria - Good fit: Production agents with multiple contributors - Not a fit: Throwaway experiments or PoCs (governance overhead is not justified) โš ๏ธ Pitfalls - Without a culture that treats prompt changes as seriously as code changes, the process becomes hollow - Skipping signing and tamper detection leaves malicious or accidental changes undetectable - Failing to continuously update the golden dataset means new failure patterns slip through unnoticed ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Implementation Approach 1. Manage prompts, system instructions, and templates in a Git repository, requiring pull requests and code reviews for every change 2. Integrate an eval gate into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically run quality checks against a golden dataset on every prompt change 3. Sign production-deployed prompts with HMAC or similar mechanisms and verify integrity at deploy time for tamper detection 4. Implement injection countermeasures for external inputs in template variables -- delimiters, sanitization, and least-privilege scoping 5. Centralize version and deployment history in a prompt registry, enabling instant rollback when issues are detected in production #AIAgents# #EnterpriseArchitecture#
Show more