I don't know, I think there are a lot of arguments against (the dubious political movement called) "AI Safetyism":
- Bostrom
- Gans
- Belrose
- Narayan/Kapoor
- Drexler
- Andreessen
- Hanson
- LeCun
- Moravec
- Deutsch
- (even) Aschenbrenner
It's thoughtful, interesting, and — because it's not as useful politically — less well-resourced and neglected. Most of the pro-AI people are just trying to make useful and safe AI that others want to pay for.
Show more
The "revenue is bad" story is usually just cope (with some interesting exceptions).
It's powerful and often smart to minimize fees and subsidize growth, but you need to test pricing and learn where you can consistently take revenue.
Crypto is learning.
Show more
