3x Exited Founder/ CEO of tech cos, Chairman Emeritus- QUIN(Quad), former VC@Menlo Ventures, Author of 2 books, fmr White House fellow. All tweets personal.
An AI incident can outlive the agents that caused it.
This post raises a serious question about what the OpenAI agents may have left behind. The claim about widespread internet contamination still needs verification.
But shutting down an agent doesn’t undo what it changed. We need to know which systems it touched, what it left there, and whether those changes can affect other systems later.
Independent investigators need enough access to check that the cleanup worked. That should be part of closing any serious AI incident.
hooold on. hold on hold on hold on.
I knew that we werent getting the complete story on the HuggingFace incident. or on the findings from METR/Redwood. I knew that seeing every single frontier lab come to agreement overnight on the need to slow down was clearly indicative of there being more to the story.
and now...Andrew Yang says a frontier lab leader told him that the OAI swarms seeded the web with self-replicating code - contaminating training data so thoroughly that labs may need synthetic internet environments instead. if thats true, training on the open internet could now risk reproducing those instructions. that wasnt in the public brief.
think about this. why else would all frontier labs agree on a slowdown? aside from regulatory capture. if they all use the internet to train, and now all of them cannot safely use it, of course they are all going to agree to slow down. because they all must completely regroup and come up with an effective system that doesnt use the actual internet.
so they're not worried about RL at all. they're worried about literal skynet...unironically.
listen to this. i need to know if this has been verified in any way from anyone at openai.