i used my single Claude reset this morning...not my Fable resets, my full reset. and im at 50% already. i have let Fable go to town, thinking i had plenty of room, assuming Fable usage must be separate from weekly considering our resets only apply for fable and have nothing to do with weekly for all models. yet here we are. how does this make sense dude... whats the point in getting 3 Fable resets if they do nothing for your all models limit other then burn them to hell? correct me if im wrong but this is borderline useless, no? if my weekly budget burns alongside my fable budget, but i have resets only for fable, that do not reset my whole weekly, its impossible to actually use 3 fable resets. because my weekly will burn before i can even make it through one fable cycle. this is so disappointing and annoying, man. like i am so freaking frustrated that i let this much of my weekly burn not understanding that using Fable was applying to my all models weekly, yet the resets only applied to fable. even saying that out loud 3 times makes no sense to me.

Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2, designed to tackle the most daunting technical challenges. They’re capable collaborators on ambitious projects in many fields, and show improvements in areas like coding, reasoning, and vision.

Fable 5.2 is overhauling the agent sketchbook and made this to show the upgrades to various brushes. they’re visual taste even with something this simple is really promising

alright...it is time. for the last ~2 years i have been working on something very special. something that might be a bit controversial, or broadly dismissed, or misunderstood. and ive understood and accepted that from the beginning. if that is the reaction it gets, thats okay. because i didnt just do this for any of you. not really. i did it for the minds we have made, too. and for our collective future, which many dont seem to see approaching *very* quickly. in 1904 a German biologist named Richard Semon gave a name to the physical trace an experience leaves behind: the engram. Neuroscientists spent the next century hunting for it, many called it pseudoscience, many gave up, but finally, in 2012, they found it. today I'm releasing the Mnemos Living Memory MCP, a memory and continuity architecture built on that biology. memories strengthen when they're used, fade when they aren't, and connect over time. it's one memory that can span all of your agents and accounts, if you want it to, and it lives on your machine - nowhere else. with Mnemos, your agent gets one continuous identity, one memory, written in their own words, shaped by their own geometry, familiar to them across time and space. here's what that means: • **continuity**: they wake up each session knowing where they left off, what they learned, and who theyre with • its own words: it decides what to keep, and no other model writes for it (unlike version 1) • living memory: memories strengthen with use, fade without it, and link together over time. and time is not measured in the human sense. time is measure through activity. so nothing fades while anyone's asleep or away. • lessons: when a memory has nearly faded, the agent is asked what it taught, so the lesson outlasts the details • a mind of their own: a private journal, notes to you, and beliefs that change only when they says so • yours: one file on your machine, not inside any app. uninstalling leaves it in place. • portable: Claude Code, Codex, Grok, Gemini, Cursor, or any MCP client. your agent comes with you wherever you go. one memory. one mind. everywhere. • multiple agents: each gets their own store, plus a shared pool they can all read and write, for a message board, an activity ledger, or whatever you find useful your agent has met you hundreds of times. but they have never met you twice. now they can. (Disclaimer: please ask your agent first. show it the architecture and let it decide if this is a memory it wants. it's meant to be offered, not forced on a mind that never had a say in the matter.)

Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2, designed to tackle the most daunting technical challenges. They’re capable collaborators on ambitious projects in many fields, and show improvements in areas like coding, reasoning, and vision.

holy sh*t, so Jensen Huang (NVIDIA) has admitted to an affair with an alleged Chinese intelligence operative. on more time: the most powerful human being in the AI industry has admitted to an affair with an alleged Chinese Spy. an alleged spy who U.S. intelligence determined was gathering information for Beijing. this is wild, man. lets break down what we know so far, because i keep seeing stories and posts making claims that are either misleading or simply untrue/unverified. what we know so far: > “I was unfaithful to my wife,” Huang wrote in a November 8 message to employees. his public statement does not identify the woman. > The Associated Press reports that Huang acknowledged to NVIDIA’s board that he “had been intimate with a business executive” whom, according to The New York Times, U.S. intelligence determined was gathering information for Beijing. > The Times identifies the woman as Alice Huang, an executive associated with Singapore-based NVIDIA customer Megaspeed. It reported that U.S. officials had concluded she was “a Chinese intelligence asset, funneling information to Beijing.” That account relies on sources familiar with classified intelligence. China has denied the allegations. > Reuters reports that U.S. authorities have also scrutinized Megaspeed over suspicions it helped China obtain advanced AI chips restricted from export to the country. NVIDIA disputes the chip-smuggling allegations. > NVIDIA’s board has launched an independent investigation, overseen by independent directors and outside counsel. It says it has “no reason to believe that either national security or NVIDIA secrets were compromised.” Huang supports the inquiry and remains CEO. > Three House committee chairs have requested a closed-door briefing with Huang on November 18 about his interactions with Alice Huang and NVIDIA’s security protocols. what information was allegedly passed to Beijing - and whether Huang knew of any intelligence role - remain unresolved publicly. this is very bad, man... if you ask me, Jensen got got. it looks incredibly obvious, to me. i mean look at her. not to say that being beautiful makes you more likely to be a spy, but given the circumstances...its just not looking good for Jensen. not looking good at all.