If the pro-life movement continues to approach the issue as it did 30 years ago, it will flounder. The more it flounders, the less their allies in the R elite will stick their necks out for it. The pro-life movement needs to assess the new political realities with fresh eyes.👇
Everyone knows that the proper role of the executive branch in response to judicial opinions they don’t like is to openly tolerate and excuse unlawful assemblies outside the houses of judges.
If you had a senior role in a government office and get saying that it screwed up on your stuff that means (1) you screwed up or (2) you had no juice. Why would you cop to either? It’s important dynamic for journos: why do you want to hear from someone who’s (1) or (2)?