My opponent wants to mutilate children, and he wants you to call it compassion. A far Left Democrat is currently running for my seat, and he has made his position clear: He supports using your tax dollars to chemically and surgically mutilate Kentucky’s children. Listen to what he said at his campaign kickoff. My opponent is defending the chemical castration and surgical alteration of kids who cannot even drive a car, vote, or get a tattoo.  Puberty blockers and cross sex hormones disrupt normal development and carry the risk of sterility, sexual dysfunction, and lifelong medical problems. This path leads to surgeries that remove healthy body parts from children who have no capacity to consent to consequences that will follow them for the rest of their lives. My opponent wants the state involved. He wants your tax dollars to pay for these grotesque crimes against children.  This is the radical agenda he would take to Frankfort if we let him.   I will not stand by while politicians treat Kentucky children as science experiments. Protecting kids from irreversible harm is not extreme. It is the bare minimum adults owe the next generation.  The ideology my opponent promotes has no place in our society. As your Representative, I stood against using Medicaid to fund these interventions, and we won.  I supported legislation that prevents inmates from using tax dollars for these perverted procedures, and we won.  Even before taking office, I supported legislation that totally bans the gender mutilation of minors, and we won! I have worked to keep this radical ideology out of our schools and out of our laws because protecting children from irreversible harm is not optional. It is a basic duty.

Words are not violence (or a crime). The guilty verdict against Shiloh Hendrix sets a dangerous precedent, demonstrating the Left’s willingness to destroy the First Amendment. A stranger digs through her purse, a man records her reaction to provoke her, and SHE ends up facing the full weight of the state? This reeks of selective prosecution. If Shiloh was referring to someone as a “cracker,” this would not have ever made news, let alone resulted in a politically motivated witch hunt pretending to be a prosecution. When the justice system treats spoken frustration as more dangerous than the initial violation of privacy, the system is fundamentally broken. The First Amendment doesn't exist to protect "polite speech." It exists to protect ALL speech from government overreach. Meanwhile, we watch soft-on-crime policies across the country grant early releases to real violent offenders. This double standard exists to silence law-abiding citizens who refuse to submit to radical Left narrative control. All of America must be a shield for constitutional liberties, not an instrument for selective prosecution. The First Amendment is non-negotiable. Shiloh Hendrix should appeal her conviction, all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if she has to.

For those wondering why the video isn’t being released: Both the prosecution and the attorneys for the media and Charlie’s family WANTED all of the evidence to be viewable by the public. One party objected to publication: Tyler Robinson’s attorney. They alleged that releasing the evidence to the public would infringe on his right to a fair jury trial as protected by the U.S. Constitution, and the judge sustained that objection for several exhibits. The video is real, and I have little doubt the public will see it in due time. Continue to pray for justice.