being told trading isn't worth learning in 2026 due to AI poker bots were better than humans by 2019. i still win $200+/hr in public games live & winning online AI recently made learning poker faster (gtowiz) i do see his point about trading though - given AI can be ur opponent. unlike poker where bots r (theoretically) banned anyone who's been around doing discretionary trading successfully for a while have a take on this? am i cooked

The way I use agents (Oct 21) Currently My AI usage is split between codex and Claude Code, but I use them both differently than I did a month ago. The way i use codex is mostly through my dot. Every morning I call my dot and put my AirPods in and I walk have a conversation for about 45 minutes. I try and handle as much work stuff as I can during that conversation. I respond to emails, write instructions for my editors, and do any planning for the day. Small tasks my dot does it, longer tasks I ask it to spin up a codex session. I REALLY wish I didn’t have to dial and wait for my dot to answer @OpenAIDevs When I’m at my desk doing coding work, document creation, or video editing I use Claude code. But, I’m not using normal Claude code I’m using Claude Code projects. The same way dot is a codex coordinator, Claude projects is a Claude code coordinator. Both allow you to spin up cloud sessions and local sessions. If I need to use computer use I will ask dot to fire up a codex session on my MacBook (that is always on) to do a task. Codex computer use is in leave of its own. For coding work or editing work that requires my MacBook I’ll ask my claude projects. Right now I have many Claude Code Projects for… each project. Sometimes I wish it was a single coordinator that could manage and organize all my work… like the way I use dot. Both Claude and Codex have a grokbot skill for anything Twitter related. So if any task involve x, they will delegate to Grokbot which is very useful as a creator. But the fact that I can’t see which model is being used when keeps me from using Grokbot. I know I can have Grokbot delegate to cursor which can specify a model but cursor is very expensive when using frontier models compared to codex and Claude, so I don’t end up doing that.

Yes 100% - @AnthropicAI you should do this by default. A coordinator should not just coordinate the threads it should coordinate with the user. Even a one line thing that mentions the thread when it completes a task would go so far.

Is it just me or is every model besides Claude and GPT models (comparably) unusable? Is this a skill issue? I swear they they are in the league of their own when I use grok, muse, Gemini or the open models I just end up frustrated.

Last week I talked to four creators doing over $1m a year in ad revenue, almost entirely from AI companies. All had fewer than 100k followers. Most of the ads are on Instagram. On My First Million, I shared what else I found: three others doing over $10m a year, with just a part-time assistant or a few freelancers. With AI getting all this funding, they have to spend the money somewhere for marketing. I don't know if this is going to last, but there's definitely a little trader gold rush going on right now. I think it's going to last at least for a handful more years. I've had a ton reach out to do ads with me on Twitter. Basically, I talk about something and get paid to do it and label it as an ad. I probably not going to do it on Twitter, but I would consider it for LinkedIn or Instagram if I love the product.

saw this video from @rileybrown yesterday and had to try it myself. made my own little virtual studio in blender. really looking forward to play more with this format. Very cool riley 🤌

Every morning Claude Sends me a video now. I tell it to explore interesting video styles on the internet before making it. It has access to my voice via elevenlabs. I told it to make it 15-30 seconds. And i give it feedback every morning and it's instructed to pick a new style and improve the next day. here's what it sent me this AM.

The reason we don’t “surf the internet” is it’s mostly slop. So we go to the same few platforms where we find posts by real humans with our same interests. When these platforms rapidly fill with AI slop, where will go? Useful question to think about.