Really looking forward to reading this new book by @mjmauboussin. I've long admired his interdisciplinary approach to investing, and his writing is always fun and rigorous (not so easy to do both at the same time!)
Another "coincidence", like the one that happened to Tristan Buckmaster with the solution of the Navier-Stokes problem? Except now it's in biology: Did Anthropic’s A.I. Really Make a Scientific Discovery on Its Own? via @NYTimes
Two heroes of today's Navier-Stokes story are not getting enough credit. Córdoba and Martínez-Zoroa came up with the crucial strategy. Others built on it and, with the help of AI, provided the computations that finished the problem. Thankfully @QuantaMagazine gets this right:
If you are baffled but curious about the Navier-Stokes news today, this article I tweeted about a few days ago is now more worth reading than ever. It gives a witty, insightful overview for a general reader, as long as you are willing to read about math.
"I present the case for total opposition to the use of artificial intelligence in mathematics."
= a view you don't often hear on X. But I am looking forward to reading it carefully, and if you care about math and AI, I encourage you to do the same.
Latest crazy story from the frontiers of math and AI -- a neurosurgery resident, with no training in advanced math, uses ChatGPT 5.6 to solve a major open problem in numerical linear algebra.