Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

TapeUP
@tapeupio
A Fully On-Chain Ledger Protocol Built on DeWEB
217 Following    2.4K Followers
Welcome @iruletrenches 👏👏👏
Personally, I couldn’t be happier to see this 🫡 When we started @TapeOutCF, one of the things I hoped for was a truly international team — people who care about builders, not just the noise. Miyamoto has been exactly that. He follows the progress closely, reads what’s being built, and shares it with the wider community. Welcome to the family, my homie @iruletrenches. Thank you for believing in what this community is building. Take the rest you need. When you’re back, there’s a lot we can build together for the global TapeOut community. Build. Prove. Grow. 💙💙💙 #TapeOut# Builder Culture 🦾
Show more
Keep Building 🦾
I’m looking at this from a bullish perspective: UP could be the missing piece that helps BEM enter a new phase of growth. 🔥 According to the data shared, @tapeupio recorded 146.23 BNB in trading volume across 103 transactions in a single day, outperforming Behemoth by volume. What matters isn’t just the ranking, but the potential to create a new growth engine for the ecosystem. If UP attracts more users, creates demand for BEM, and encourages long-term staking or locking, we could see a positive feedback loop: UP attracts users → BEM demand grows → More BEM gets locked or consumed → Circulating supply faces downward pressure. If ecosystem revenue also continues to fuel BEM buybacks and burns, that adds another compelling catalyst. What excites me most is that BEM may not have to rely solely on market hype. It could benefit from the growth of real products across the TapeOut ecosystem. When multiple products create genuine demand for a token, the growth narrative becomes much stronger than speculation alone. Of course, this bullish scenario still needs confirmation through actual BEM usage, staking, and burn data. UP could be the catalyst. TapeOut is the ecosystem. And BEM has the opportunity to become the center of this value cycle. 🚀 The real bull case isn't just more volume — it's more reasons to hold, use, and burn BEM. #TapeUP# #TapeOut# #BEM# #Crypto# #Web3# #DeFi# #Bullish# Make my bullish claim more cautiousMake the BEM value loop clearer
Show more
.@iruletrenches The latest data shows it's already at 3.14%. We met on BunnyPark in 2021, and I'm grateful to meet again on @TapeOutWorld @Blonskr
I’ve been taking a break from socials and trading, but every time I occasionally log in to catch up on the latest developments in the @TapeOutWorld ecosystem, I’m blown away by how much progress is being made. one of the projects that’s really stood out to me is @tapeupio. growing rapidly, with over 2% of BEM’s total supply now staked on TapeUp, offering attractive yields while putting $BEM to work and its circuits already up 10x from launch (built by an OG DeFi team from the @BNBCHAIN) definitely one to keep an eye on. the ecosystem, builders, contributors, and major metrics are all growing at an incredible pace. I genuinely believe @TapeOutWorld ($BEM) is one of the most exciting things happening in all of crypto space rn, and I couldn’t be more bullish on what’s being built here. $BEM is in my view, an investment not a trade, exactly the kind of non-consensus opportunity you want to position yourself in before it becomes consensus as the metrics explode and the progress becomes impossible to ignore. honestly, I can barely log off for two or three days without coming back to an overwhelming amount of progress and I haven’t been able to keep up with, and also a vibrant community that’s building non stop towards a common goal and mission. @TapeOutWorld ($BEM) is still under the radar relative to what’s being built on CT and even moreso outside of CT and that’s what makes it an extremely asymmetrical bet here as we’re still insanely early. and I don’t think that lasts forever. kudos to @okx @XLayerOfficial @wallet @zakk_okx @misaENFP for pushing forward and contributing to the growth of the ecosystem and organizing hackathons and the latest 100k usdt prize to builders. @okx has proven itself to be at the forefront of innovations in this space since the earliest days of crypto and it’s great to see its still the case till today. as @zakk_okx said, “the best way to preditct the futurz is to build it” kudos to @BruceBlue as well for spearheading the @TapeOutCF, accelerating the growth of the TapeOut ecosystem and empowering the community. i’m honored to join the foundation as an early supporter and contribute alongside everyone. looking forward to coming back from my break and sharing more research on @TapeOutWorld most promising projects and investment opportunities. lastly, big respect to @blonskr for the incredible work he’s doing for the ecosystem. this kid is operating on another level 🫡
Show more
Build. Prove. Grow. Keep Building 🦾 #TapeOut# #TapeUP#
仔細看完 PoB 這篇,我覺得 TapeUP 真正想改的,不是「怎麼把幣發出去」,而是 一筆買盤進來之後,怎麼讓參與不是只發生在 Day 0。 傳統 Launch 很像一場事件: 募集、買入、畢業、上池。 PoB 想做的比較像把這件事拉長成一個過程。 同樣 100 的預算,不一定第一天全部打進去,而是留一部分慢慢執行;Builder Code 也不是憑空增加買盤,而是改變原本待執行資金的時間。 這裡我第一個想到的其實是 DCA。 我以前做美股 ETF 定投時,本質上也是同一筆資金不要一次打完,而是把進場時間拉長。 但 PoB 跟個人 DCA 又不太一樣。 DCA 是個人的進場節奏,PoB 想做的是把整個 Launch 的參與節奏寫成公開規則。 我覺得這點反而很重要。 不是製造更多錢,而是重新安排原本那筆錢怎麼進市場。 這樣至少讓一個項目的參與,不會只剩下首日搶跑、後面看誰跑得快。 當然,這不代表價格一定漲,也不代表賣壓消失。 下來看的是: PoB 能不能真的把 Launch 從一次性事件,慢慢變成一段更長的共建週期。 如果後面再把 Build / Usage / Settlement 這些真實數據接進來,那才會開始和「Proof of Build」這個名字真正對上。 Launch is an event. Participation can be a process. 這句我很喜歡。 Build. Prove. Grow. #TapeOut# Builder Culture #TapeUp# #BEM#
Show more
Build. Prove. Grow. Keep Building 🦾 #TapeOut# #TapeUP#
PoB Trading Engine:从一次性买入到可验证的参与过程。 TapeUP 提出的 Proof of Build Trading Engine,核心不是创造额外买盘,而是把一笔购买预算重新组织成「即时执行 + 计划执行」的结构,并允许符合规则的 Builder Code 触发提前执行。 它解决的是一个真实问题: 资产可以很快上线,但建设、用户增长和社区协作通常需要更长时间。仅有即时成交一种参与方式,很难覆盖整个建设周期。 对基金会和长期投资者而言,这套机制有三点值得关注: ① 预算不变,只改变时间分布:不新增购买本金,只调整既有资金进入市场的节奏。 ② 执行可核对:即时比例、计划周期、Builder Code 加速规则都可以公开参数化,减少“承诺未来买盘”但无法验证的情况。 ③ 为后续 Proof of Build 留接口:交易执行与建设证据(代码贡献、电路交付、使用情况等)仍需独立核验,但至少把市场参与的时间结构先做透明。 它不能消除卖压,也不能保证价格上涨。真正的约束在于规则是否可执行、参数是否充分披露、以及后续能否与真实建设记录形成闭环。 Launch is an event. Participation can be a process. 我非常支持继续把透明市场参与和长期建设连接起来。 Build. Prove. Grow. #TapeOut# Builder Culture 🦾
Show more
Build. Prove. Grow. Keep Building 🦾 #TapeOut# #TapeUP#
🚩My Assessment of PoB @BruceBlue @tapeupio From a Web3 product perspective, I believe PoB is a promising concept worth experimenting with, but its competitive advantage has yet to be proven. What interests me most is not splitting buy orders across 7, 30, or 90 days. Time-based execution already exists. The real question is whether Builder Code can create a useful coordination network without becoming a mechanism for artificial transaction activity or inflated trading volume. To convince the market, I would look for three key proofs: 1-On-chain transparency: Users can independently verify executed funds, pending balances, withdrawals, and fees. 2-Real-world effectiveness: Comparative data demonstrates improved execution outcomes, rather than just attractive charts. 3-A genuine link to building: Products and meaningful contributions can be independently verified, separate from trading volume. If TapeUP delivers on all three, PoB could evolve from a scheduled-buy mechanism into a valuable component of launch infrastructure. If it only solves the trading side, it may still be a useful product — but there is not yet enough evidence to claim that it solves the long-term challenge of building a sustainable Builder Culture. The real test is not how much capital PoB can schedule, but how much verifiable value it helps create. 🚀 #PoB# #TapeUP# #TapeOut# #BEM# #Web3# #DeFi# #Crypto# #BuilderCulture# #XLayer# #BuildProveGrow# 🚀
Show more
🚩My Assessment of PoB @BruceBlue @tapeupio From a Web3 product perspective, I believe PoB is a promising concept worth experimenting with, but its competitive advantage has yet to be proven. What interests me most is not splitting buy orders across 7, 30, or 90 days. Time-based execution already exists. The real question is whether Builder Code can create a useful coordination network without becoming a mechanism for artificial transaction activity or inflated trading volume. To convince the market, I would look for three key proofs: 1-On-chain transparency: Users can independently verify executed funds, pending balances, withdrawals, and fees. 2-Real-world effectiveness: Comparative data demonstrates improved execution outcomes, rather than just attractive charts. 3-A genuine link to building: Products and meaningful contributions can be independently verified, separate from trading volume. If TapeUP delivers on all three, PoB could evolve from a scheduled-buy mechanism into a valuable component of launch infrastructure. If it only solves the trading side, it may still be a useful product — but there is not yet enough evidence to claim that it solves the long-term challenge of building a sustainable Builder Culture. The real test is not how much capital PoB can schedule, but how much verifiable value it helps create. 🚀 #PoB# #TapeUP# #TapeOut# #BEM# #Web3# #DeFi# #Crypto# #BuilderCulture# #XLayer# #BuildProveGrow# 🚀
Show more
Build. Prove. Grow. Keep Building 🦾 #TapeOut# #TapeUP#
PoB Trading Engine:从一次性买入到可验证的参与过程。 TapeUP 提出的 Proof of Build Trading Engine,核心不是创造额外买盘,而是把一笔购买预算重新组织成「即时执行 + 计划执行」的结构,并允许符合规则的 Builder Code 触发提前执行。 它解决的是一个真实问题: 资产可以很快上线,但建设、用户增长和社区协作通常需要更长时间。仅有即时成交一种参与方式,很难覆盖整个建设周期。 对基金会和长期投资者而言,这套机制有三点值得关注: ① 预算不变,只改变时间分布:不新增购买本金,只调整既有资金进入市场的节奏。 ② 执行可核对:即时比例、计划周期、Builder Code 加速规则都可以公开参数化,减少“承诺未来买盘”但无法验证的情况。 ③ 为后续 Proof of Build 留接口:交易执行与建设证据(代码贡献、电路交付、使用情况等)仍需独立核验,但至少把市场参与的时间结构先做透明。 它不能消除卖压,也不能保证价格上涨。真正的约束在于规则是否可执行、参数是否充分披露、以及后续能否与真实建设记录形成闭环。 Launch is an event. Participation can be a process. 我非常支持继续把透明市场参与和长期建设连接起来。 Build. Prove. Grow. #TapeOut# Builder Culture 🦾
Show more