It’s the same thing every time: 1. A black person has the courage to point the objective truth about slavery. 2. Person gets personally attacked with subjective opinions - “you hate black people, you’re a coon” 3. But that person is saying what is needed to emancipate both black people and white people from the mental slavery that black victimhood and white guilt has us all in. No, black people who say the truth do not hate black people. Someone who loves you will tell you what you need to hear, even if you don’t want to hear it. Good video from @chadojackson

Jason Arday shouldn’t be dead. But he is dead - because he didn’t tell the truth. And Cambridge University didn’t look for the truth - because he’s black. And fellow black professors didn’t ask for the truth - because he is black. Jason lied repeatedly. And he told the exact lies that allow one to excel in the system that elite universities have adopted. A system that factors in race, hardship, and lived experience under the banner of equity, instead of pure performance. Nearly everyone in these institutions ignored Jason’s lies, to try and protect black people. They called the people seeking the truth racists. Of course there were some racists. But the majority of people just wanted the truth. Avoiding the truth didn’t help black people. Double standards in academia aren’t helping black people. They hurt the perception of black people who are truly the best, and would have held prestigious positions at elite schools, solely off the merits of their performance. Double standards always backfire. Even when well intentioned. Even when intended to correct for past oppression. Race-conscious hiring and admissions have created a situation where it is rational to wonder whether a black person has achieved their position because they were simply the best, or because they were good enough, and black. This is not a racist thought. It’s a rational thing to wonder when a system promotes people based on race. It’s a thing I’ve wondered about myself, as someone who graduated from Harvard - which had race-conscious admissions. No amount of insistence that it’s racist will make it racist. It’s no more racist than it would be to wonder whether a white player got into the NBA off of just performance, if the NBA decided to focus on “fixing” the underrepresentation of white people. This is the logical downside of race-conscious hiring and admissions. You can think the downside is worth the upside. But the downside remains. Calling people with legitimate concerns racist didn’t protect black people. It didn’t protect Jason. It hurt black people who have earned their positions. And it allowed a troubled man who built his career on lies to rise to a height so great that his fall from grace killed him. We could have just had the truth. Instead, we have a tragedy.

I was in Madrid when Spain won the World Cup. Almost 2 million people celebrated in the streets. I saw 0 violence. 0 property damage. 0 rioting. Spain’s government later reported a total of 6 arrests, and no serious incidents. Almost 2 million people. Almost entirely peaceful. When a Parisian team won the Champions League in 2026, riots broke out and trashed the city. And it happened before that, in 2025. And there was violence before that, in 2018, when France won the World Cup. Guess when their celebrations were peaceful? In 1998 - before their immigration policy created an entire population of people who didn’t assimilate. Immigration can be great for a country. But not when you do it without being thoughtful who you admit, how many, and for how long. If Spain makes the same mistakes as France, soon their “celebrations” will look like Paris’s. England is already well underway.

Wake up Europe. You have civilizations worth preserving, and it’s not racist to make sure entrants are compatible with it. If Spain doesn’t handle this migrant invasion decisively, they’ll experience exactly what Paris does. Riots and chaos, even during celebrations.

See! I told you he's racist! ^ Is exactly what people are rushing to conclude from the Trump post depicting the Obamas as monkeys. But if you actually watch the video you'll see something different. Rushing to conclusions is killing this country.

Would you believe these insane tariffs that the U.S. is bullying Canada with? 250% for milk? 291% for butter? 208% for whey? 241% for CHEESE? Oh wait - those are actually tariffs that Canada imposed on the U.S. last year.

Think Trump was aggressive to Zelenskyy for no reason? Watch the whole talk. Timestamps below. Zelenskyy was emotional. Interrupted Trump. Called Putin names. Raised his eyebrows. All before Trump checked him. And he called Vance a bitch. He wasn’t ready for peace. 2:00 Trump compliments Zelenskyy 4:00 Zelenskyy calls Putin a terrorist 12:00 Trump cracks joke with Zelensky 13:56 Zelenskyy interrupts Trump 17:20 Zelenskyy throws his hands up in seeming frustration 19:00 reporter asks Zelenskyy why he’s not wearing a suit 19:22 Trump commits to sending arms to Ukraine 19:41 Zelensky raises eyebrows and rolls eyes at Trump’s statement 22:55 Trump takes the edge off of the suit question by joking with Zelensky that he likes his outfit 23:49 Zelensky contradicts Trump and keeps painting Putin in a negative light 24:19 Zelensky says Putin will never accept ceasefire and pushes for American security guarantee 25:55 Zelensky says Putin hates Ukrainians 27:00 Zelensky says Putin should pay all reconstruction costs 29:19 Zelensky shakes head as Trump speaks 32:22 Zelensky says Putin wants to annex Poland 32:30 Zelensky says Putin will attack America 33:00 Zelensky interrupts Trump 39:19 This is when Trump went on the offensive by calling out Zelenskyy hatred for Putin and started to escalate 39:14 Vance says Zelensky has been disrespectful, and conversation continues to escalate 42:40 Apparently calls Vance “suka”, meaning bitch, under his breath. You don't have to like how Trump handled this, but don’t buy into the story that he ambushed Zelensky.