@DagobertIX @chris_komatsu @RandPaul <<FCS insertion is CTCCTCGGCGGG. The reverse complement is 5′‑ CCCGCCGAGGAG ‑3′. GCCGAG is the NmeAIII recognition site, but only visible on the antisense strand, not the sense strand.>> @tony_vandongen noted something like this when raised originally.

Here too in Serial passage there were unexpected changes in certain key sections. Note these experiments are never assessed from a Biosynthesic Forensics perspective...there are too many sensitivities at @UNSW to have these types of insinuations made...and so the best that @Globalbiosec can do is point at obvious Discrepant Epidemiology issues with these and other data sets. <>

It is the further evidence of ongoing undisclosed Chimeric Spike experiments that is important. Early versions of RaTG13 from 2017 with reads 27 to 33 here demonstrate two things from a bioinformatic forensics methodology perspective; 1) there is enough variation from the earliest to the latest versions of RaTG13 to demonstrate that versions of Ra4991 or similar were under selection pressure from serial passage…not that these discrepancies simply need to be accepted as bad reads instead of evidence of dangerous biological warfare methodology. 2) these WIV experiments 2017-2018 and 2019 ongoing also involved 7896 ORF8 series data in ways where earlier Chimeric studies of this nature sought to investigate DURC Apoptosis and Immune evasion. In October 2019 these experiments were repackaged to look like Viral Evolution experiments. But the evidence of ORF8 chimera linked data is there from July 2018

This later deleted <> to GenBank can be found here; <> There are some temporality issues with the preprint with respect to the <> Data submission, where earlier ORF8 experiments happened in 2018 and later coverup experiments happened August 2019, can be mapped from the GenBank remnant bioinformatics. <@MonaRahalkar , and many others for the lively discussions and thoughtful feedback that encouraged me to pursue and publish this analysis. Note: This is an early preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. All errors are my own. I welcome constructive feedback, criticism, and expert discussion. You can find me on X >> @jarikuikanmaki So; first thing to point out when looking for Semiotic Signal is that this submission has the Cypher at the tail of SARS1 Bing fucking Oooo! This requires bio forensic analysis ASAP There is Truth in Method or this method is flawed and the results misleading …so please test for yourself.