A MOTHER FACES THE DEATH PENALTY. HER LAWYER SAYS THE GRAND JURY NEVER HEARD THE FULL STORY. Andrea Shaw is facing murder charges over the deaths of her 18-month-old twins. Prosecutors allege she smothered them. Shaw maintains that the children became ill after receiving the Hep A, DTaP and flu vaccines, and that her concerns were dismissed before the twins were later found dead. She has also pointed to a family history of flu-shot reactions and went public with Children’s Health Defense. Now her lawyer is seeking to have the indictment dismissed, arguing that the grand jury was never presented with evidence that could have challenged the prosecution’s theory. The prosecutor insists, “This is not a vaccine case.” But if the judge is being asked to consider the evidence, shouldn’t all relevant evidence be examined - including anything that could challenge the allegations? The deaths of two babies are a tragedy. A potential death sentence is an enormous consequence. Neither deserves anything less than a thorough, impartial examination of the facts. Justice isn’t about shutting down questions. It’s about making sure the evidence speaks for itself. The judge is considering the motion. Read more: