🎉 IPO Allotment Results Are Now Available! The allotment results for Baige Online and ALEBUND PHARMA-B have been announced. If you participated in the subscription, you can now check your allocation in the BiFinance App: 📩 Message Center → Allotment Notification 📈 IPO Page → View Allotment Results Thank you for choosing BiFinance IPO. More quality IPO opportunities are on the way—stay tuned! #BiFinance# #IPO# #Allotment# #HKIPO# #Investing# #Stocks# #Web3# #Finance#

Reference the issue with regard to allotment of a centre in Abu Dhabi to a candidate in Nagpur, NTA would like to state the following: Following the rescheduling of NEET (UG) 2026 to 21 June, the National Testing Agency reopened the examination-city correction window to assist candidates. Key points: High success rate: Around 3.2 lakh candidates used the correction window, and NTA allotted the preferred examination city to over 99.5% of them. On the 'Abu Dhabi' query: NTA's web-activity records indicate that the city change in this case was made through the candidate's own registered login during the open correction window, with a consistent single-user access pattern. Immediate Resolution for Last-Minute Requests: Despite the Abu Dhabi centre being chosen by the candidate, the NTA received an informal request on the evening of June 19 (just 48 hours before the exam) to change the centre to Nagpur. NTA personnel immediately initiated the change and contacted the candidate's father on 19th evening itself to help them complete the formal process. NTA has observed that on 3 occasions, one - the centre was changed to Abu Dhabi using candidate’s credentials and twice it was previewed that the centre is Abu Dhabi. Despite that NTA has accorded to aspirant’s request and the change of centre was actioned. A "Student-First" Approach: The NTA's priority is that no candidate misses the examination over an administrative doubt. #NEET2026# #NTA#

German police fatally shot 21-year-old Abdul Ballout, the suspect in the Berlin CSD car-ramming attack, during a gunfight after he opened fire on officers at a garden allotment in Berlin-Spandau. Source: BILD

John Lines 'Practical Advice (unsolicited) 'Marrows and Tarragon' John's work showing scenes of everyday life from the slice of England he lives in (Staffordshire) Allotments feature quite a lot The first has a laundry line. Yeah

HUNTER BIDEN TO LAUNCH $LAPTOP MEME COIN, SOURCES SAY -- WSJ HUNTER BIDEN'S $LAPTOP MEME COIN TO LAUNCH SEPT. 9 ON COINBASE-AFFILIATED BLOCKCHAIN, SOURCES SAY -- WSJ HUNTER BIDEN, FOUNDERS OF $LAPTOP TO HOLD 30% OF 1B TOKENS ISSUED, SOURCES SAY -- WSJ ANOTHER $LAPTOP ALLOTMENT TO GO TO PEOPLE WHO LOST MONEY ON solana:6p6xgHyF7AeE6TZkSmFsko444wqoP15icUSqi2jfGiPN, AMONG OTHERS, SOURCES SAY -- WSJ

$INTC Technicals 8/16 - ATHs, see you soon... again. Strap in, this is a comprehensive piece. Price for Intel is $102.50 at close 8/14. Here is first a reminder that Intel is down -28% from ATHs. From the late-June peak into the July lows (around $81.79), the stock was down more than -40% at the worst point. It has bounced since then, but it is still meaningfully lower than where it was a month or so ago. So while the YTD performance remains very strong (+177%), the stock is still in a significant correction from its highs and has underperformed the broader sector’s recent recovery in relative terms over the last 1.5 months. - Fib (61.8%) has held its level of support extremely well. 9 daily EMA (~$100.04) and SMA (~$100.74) continues to hold support line, as well. Still trading above all major MAs except the 50MA which is not far from closing price on Friday ($102.61). - A break off of this orange line in the middle will lead to a massive break for a home run rally. - RSI has recovered from oversold territory and is now sitting right around the midpoint. This is neutral-to-constructive. - TMO / TTM are showing that momentum is beginning to turn positive while volatility remains compressed. This is basically low volatility with early signs of directional energy building (upwards). This is a constructive internal signal. When the ribbons start turning higher while price is still inside a squeeze, it often precedes the volatility expansion. It supports the idea that underlying momentum is quietly improving even while the stock looks quiet on the surface. - Ulcer Index is at 11.97 and declining. Drawdown pressure is easing after the sharp July decline. - Price is trading in the upper half of the Bollinger bands but still well below the upper band, consistent with a consolidation phase inside a broader range. - This chart is in a daily squeeze (black crosses still active) with early positive momentum signals (green dots appearing). - Structure-wise, the market has completed a downside BOS (break of structure) and is now coiling inside a potential accumulation range above the key 0.618 Fib level ($94.74) and the major dark-pool zone near $97.71. - The setup remains one of low volatility preparing for an expansion move. A squeeze release, combined with a decisive break of the ~$106 zone, would be the bullish trigger. Manipulation: My prior charting had the flag breakout, which it did - but the stock has seemed to be overtly suppressed and oversold in the last couple months. Now, I know why. Institutional activity and likely combined with the fact that they knew share offering was happening. This is fairly common to exhaust retail buyers, force liquidity, and then they ultimately acquire shares off-exchange, or in the open market. What is hilarious is JP Morgan underwrote the share offering and then still had Intel as a top short and purposely had sell-side stay underweight, while they keep acquiring shares. Anyway ... Greenshoe: Now, the greenshoe is in effect too. As we know, Intel upsized the common stock sale to $20B priced at $95/share to fund foundry/AI capex. This is also the price at which CEO Lip-Bu Tan bought $10M in shares on the open market. Underwriters (investment banks) hold a ~$3B 30-day over-allotment option to buy extra shares and stabilize price if it falls below $95. This implies limited downside for buyers. With the stock recently trading above $100 and strong demand (5x oversubscribed offering), the mechanism provides price protection, supporting the view that Intel has low risk of losses near-term. Darkpool: In the case you missed my post on the darkpool print August 11th - Intel printed 12.06 million shares in the dark pool at $97.71. That is roughly $1.18 billion in notional and 10.81% of average daily volume. Total volume that day hit 164 million shares. $97.71 has not been touched since. Price moved higher in the sessions that followed and has held well above it. This is your clear support level. Every time Intel has seen $500M - $1B+ dark pool activity at a key level, meaningful upside has followed. Last time had $500M+ of orders, price traded at $20 and went on a run to $32. The August 11th print at $97.71 is the latest in that sequence. April 28th: $1.1B of Darkpool orders printed at market close, at $84.52. After April 28th, the stock flew past $84.52 and gained +66% to ATHs in 2 months. January 28th: $500M premium of darkpool orders printed at market close, at $48.78. This is 11,330,148 shares traded, representing 10.34% avg volume. December 20th, 2025: $1.4B premium of darkpool orders at $36.82 (price at close). The stock ran up to $54 before cooling off again. Gametime: The setup is still constructive on the longer timeframe (above the 200-day, major dark-pool support held, positive internal momentum signals). The moment it breaks this $106-$107 resistance and the 50EMA, it will move quicker than you can react. I know it sounds insane but my price target to end this year is well into $175, if not $200 (which is our trillion dollar market cap). I have been right more often than I have been wrong. Catalysts: 1. $GOOGL Google and $AAPL Apple remain the biggest potential catalysts. Any confirmation from the customers themselves, even though we know it's happening, would be a real slap to the faces of those who doubt. 2. $SKHY SK Hynix collaboration. With former SK Hynix CEO now running Intel’s advanced packaging, and active talks on EMIB for HBM and possible Ohio fab operating partnership - this could send it. 3. 14A progress. PDK 0.9 is expected in October. Multiple big names ($AMD and $NVDA Nvidia included, alongside Apple) are evaluating it. Never say never. Due diligence tells us we are further along in some of these than you think. Firm capacity commitments in H2 would be a major signal. 4. Memory. That is all I have to say about that. We are about to go on a generational rally. LONG. LIVE. INTEL.

As agents become the biggest users of software, then all software has to be available in a headless fashion. Agents won’t be using your UI, they’ll be talking to your APIs. So the question becomes what is the business model of software and this headless approach in the future? Here are a few thoughts on how everything plays out based on what we’re seeing and doing at Box, but also conversation with other platforms. 1) Seats don’t go away for *people*. Seats are still a convenient and efficient way to have a customer use technology predictably for a set of users within a baseline set of usage. The key, though, is that when the customer pays for a seat, it has to come with a set of usage of APIs on behalf of that user that the agent can use on their behalf. The user will need to be able to interact with their data and the underlying tool via any agent they work with, and an embedded amount of usage will come with the seat. I would imagine most software -Box included- will enable seats to work with their data at a relatively high volume via systems like ChatGPT, Codex, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, Copilot, Perplexity, Factory, Cogniton, et al. quite seamlessly. If you don’t do this, you’re DOA. 2) Agents may have “seats” if they are doing stateful work in the system, but they will be priced very differently than people. Seats (or the equivalent) can make sense when you have an agent that has its own workspace, stores its own data, needs a different set of permissions compared to the user, and so on. If a company wants this agent to be around for long period of time, that may very well look like another “user” in the system. Openclaw-style agents highlight what this future could look like. The only issue on pricing here is that one customer could decide to do all their work in 1 agent, and another might split it into 1,000 agents. So pricing like a human seat is nearly impossible and impractical; each company will have a different approach for this as it gets tricky perfectly trying to capture all the value within an agent seat. 3) The dominant pricing for headless use that goes above the seat allotment, or when an agent is firmly acting on their own, will be a consumption model. Many enterprises software platforms have previously operated like this with PaaS options, and agents will look like another machine user of their system. In some cases the APIs might get priced just as they did previously, but in other cases there may need to be new types of APIs that represent the work an agent would do in one go -more akin to an outcome- instead of a series of API calls. This is especially germane when the headless software also has an agentic use-case embedded within in, such as orchestrating the process within their own system via AI. Overall the growth of this usage pattern is effectively unbounded as the use-cases for agents operating on data in these systems will dramatically exceed what people do with their data and tools today. Every platform that goes headless (which will be anyone that wants to take advantage of agents) will need to adopt a model like this. Some may fight it initially but it’s an inevitably as there will always be more and more agents outside your platform than people. Overall, there’s a lot of really interesting changes left to come in software due to headless use of these systems. Early days.

Ask a 3D vision-language model what's near the table and in front of the curtain, and it might guess "sewing machine." The right answer is a tray rack. CVP (UC San Diego + Lambda, WACV 2026) fixes this with a target-affinity token for task-relevant objects and an allocentric grid for global context. Against Video-3D-LLM: • SQA3D EM: 58.6 → 62.3 • Scan2Cap CIDEr: 83.8 → 90.5 • Better on all 5 benchmarks tested Full results across ScanQA, SQA3D, ScanRefer, Multi3DRefer, and Scan2Cap, plus how the central/peripheral split works:

Vacancy open: we search for Partnership manager to join our collective. Your freedom role ✔️new partner outreach for Membership & events like Neo-cypherpunk Summit ✔️membership: ✔️summit: ✔️ ensure mutual alligment between foundations, protocols and applications with our values-driven approach You will work alongside @PG_CDG & will help to protect millions of people with the next gen freedom tech. Apply now: