Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

Search results for Regulation
Regulation community
One keyword maps to one global community path.
Create community
People
Not Found
Tweets including Regulation
Regulation brings fairness to the overall market and reduces the advantage of certain parties, this is doomed
Lily Liu on why US crypto regulation matters "The United States is about 15% of global GDP, but 50-60% of global capital markets." "We came from a very hostile administration from 2020 to 2024. Now it's a very crypto-friendly administration… but you can have a sea change again." "Legislation that codifies regulation, rather than regulating through enforcement, is a really important thing for us to get right." "The CLARITY Act would do the same for non-payments use cases… regulated financial institutions being able to jump in from the commodities angle, from trading, from markets, from banking."
Show more
Crypto industry scores win as Clarity Act regulation bill clears Senate hurdle
SENATOR TIM SCOTT LEADS HISTORIC CLARITY ACT MARKUP FOR DIGITAL ASSET REGULATION Senator Tim Scott (@SenatorTimScott) officially opens the Senate Banking Committee’s markup of the CLARITY Act to establish a definitive regulatory framework for the US digital asset industry. The Chairman highlighted massive GOP efforts toward bipartisanship, revealing that over 33,000 words and 219 pages were added to the draft since June 2025 to address cross-party concerns. The committee is now moving toward a final vote to advance the bill to the Senate floor and secure American dominance in global financial innovation. Ahead of the vote, Senator Cynthia Lummis (@SenLummis) called it a Pro-consumer bill...
Show more
UBS boss warns of European decline with ‘over-regulation across the board’
"negotiate a deal with Xi Jinping to impose identical regulation and pre-release vetting on open-weight models in China." Good luck with that
An interesting line in Politico’s coverage of the proposed AI executive order, which, at 16 pages, is also much longer than expected. This is still under discussion and not yet finalized, and everything I'm about to write is conjecture, but it appears the administration intends to regulate US open-weight models. Here are the reasons why this will almost certainly happen in some form. Open-weight models are currently about nine months behind the frontier. Once the big labs are subjected to pre-release screening, development itself will not slow down, but the release cadence will. At that point, open-weight development will quickly close the gap - much faster than nine months. When those models surpass the big labs, everyone will switch to using open-weight alternatives. From the administration’s perspective, allowing this option defeats the entire purpose of regulation. If the government is restricting and vetting models beyond a certain capability level, and people can simply switch to open-weight models that are just as capable - and eventually even more capable as the big labs slow down their release schedules under the new rules - then the situation becomes even worse from the government's perspective. They will not allow this to happen. Second, the big labs themselves have almost certainly been covertly lobbying for open-weight models to be included in any new regulations. Allowing the public to switch to a superior, free alternative would completely destroy their business models, potentially bankrupting them all. Given the enormous scale of current investment in these companies and in AI infrastructure, the broader economy would also suffer "significant disruption". That leaves China. If the two dynamics above play out, the same pattern repeats: everyone switches to Chinese open-weight models, which now quickly surpass both US closed and open releases. This produces the same consequences for the big labs, and causes the same issues with regulation. The government therefore has only two realistic options: ban Chinese models from use in the West, or negotiate a deal with Xi Jinping to impose identical regulation and pre-release vetting on open-weight models in China. The first option would mean China pulls ahead and wins the AI race. So the administration will almost certainly pursue the second. Negotiations are likely already underway, because the ideal outcome for the admin would be to announce that China has agreed to similar restrictions to what they are announcing, thereby blunting domestic backlash. China will know it has the US over a barrel and will insist on compromises. Compromises such as lifting all export controls on NVIDIA GPUs.
Show more
Re-hedge here at 27016 because the US regulation tension is still giving sell pressure on the market continuously. In general I believe this year bitcoin will be sidelined from 24000-31000 ranges.
Throwback to exactly 5 years ago @RonConway @brian_armstrong @iampaulgrewal and I were in DC making the case for common sense crypto regulation. Today CLARITY cleared the Senate Banking Committee on a bipartisan basis. Patience pays –congrats to everyone who made this possible.
Show more
📊Today’s #BIT# Daily Chart - May 12, 2026 ⬇️ Crypto Regulation Week: Circle Emerges as the Clear Early Winner #BIT# #Circle# #USDC# #Stablecoins# #CryptoRegulation# #Bitcoin# #DigitalAssets#
Show more
Chairman @SECPaulSAtkins at the @MilkenInstitute's Global Conference 2026: "We're focusing on economic materiality for disclosure and the minimum effective dose of regulation that's needed for investor protection and to keep our markets going."
Show more