Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

AYi
@AYi_AInotes
AI 实用主义,专注AI落地的组织和业务know how,半年AI+副业变现6位数,关注商业,职场,投资,业务出海, 大厂组织发展专家 × 组织心理学,Prompt专家,分享有用的 AI 实践,也分享工具之外的深度认知 以术入道,以道御术,KEEP BUILDING 合作/交流:DM/TG @AYi_AInotes
592 Following    66.9K Followers
Xiaohongshu (RedNote)—often called China's Facebook, with 350 million users and over a decade of lifestyle notes—has quietly open-sourced a large language model. I've always believed that in the end, the LLM race won't be won by whoever is smarter, but by whoever holds data that others can't copy. Math and code? Anyone can scrape those. But "how to plan a wedding," "how to organize a trip," "how to open a shop without stepping on every landmine"—that kind of knowledge? Only Xiaohongshu has it. What's interesting is its technical choice. A sibling model in the same series just scored a perfect 42/42 at IMO 2026—a feat achieved by only 7 human contestants worldwide. Yet this open-sourced version didn't chase static benchmark scores. Instead, it aims directly at long-horizon life agents: a 512K context window, 16B active parameters, and a method called TEMPO that specifically tackles the RL training challenge of tasks spanning tens of hours. While everyone else is racing to top the exams, Xiaohongshu went ahead and raised an AI that actually knows how to live.
Show more
Introducing dots3-note preview — a small but mighty step toward long-horizon agency in real life. 🔹 280B MoE with 16B active parameters, a 512K context window, and multimodal understanding across text, vision, and audio 🔹 Introduces TEMPO, a new RL approach for long-horizon agent training through self-critiquing and test-time-scaled value estimation 🔹 Built to reason, explore unfamiliar environments, update memory over time, and combine multimodal perception with coding and tool use to solve complex tasks 🔹 Open weights on Hugging Face, alongside two open benchmarks for real-life agents: VibeSearchBench and VibeLifeBench Competitive with much larger models across reasoning, agentic, and multimodal evaluations. 🔗 Tech blog: 🔗 Model weights: 🔗 Github:
Show more
Stop waiting for a smarter model. The agent era starts the day execution costs hit the floor. Ling-3.0-flash quietly showed up on OpenRouter. 124B total params, 5.1B active. No launch event, no marketing push, it just appeared. Output quality matches some flagship models, roughly half the token cost of Claude, and a full commented code block lands the second you hit enter. Spent three days throwing every task I didn't want to do at it: ▫️ 30-page product doc into a structured table. Fewer field errors than when I do it by hand. ▫️ Bug fix spanning 5 files. It wrote the test cases too. ▫️ A 963-line single-file SaaS landing page in one shot. Glassmorphism, particle field, interactive workflow, all of it. I read that landing page line by line. Here's the honest part. Every constraint I wrote into the prompt, it shipped. Particle counts, devicePixelRatio cap, reduced-motion fallback. Not one missed. Anything that needed someone to actually look at the render, it had no idea. The five workflow nodes sit 70px apart, center to center. The circles are 72px wide. The last three pairs overlap. I moved them by hand. This isn't a model you hand strategy to. It's a tireless workhorse. The sharper your instructions, and the more of them a machine can check, the better it holds. Agents have been hyped for two years without landing. The blocker was never intelligence. One run just cost more than paying a person. My setup now: flagship plans, this one executes, and I keep a verification step in between. Tiering your models is the real edge in 2026. Still free right now. 256K context, tool calling on. Take the repetitive, structured, verifiable work off your plate and move it over for two days. Save the budget and your attention for what actually needs thinking. Stop using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. #AI# #Agents# #LLM#
Show more
Stop waiting for a smarter model. The agent era starts the day execution costs hit the floor. Ling-3.0-flash quietly showed up on OpenRouter. 124B total params, 5.1B active. No launch event, no marketing push, it just appeared. Output quality matches some flagship models, roughly half the token cost of Claude, and a full commented code block lands the second you hit enter. Spent three days throwing every task I didn't want to do at it: ▫️ 30-page product doc into a structured table. Fewer field errors than when I do it by hand. ▫️ Bug fix spanning 5 files. It wrote the test cases too. ▫️ A 963-line single-file SaaS landing page in one shot. Glassmorphism, particle field, interactive workflow, all of it. I read that landing page line by line. Here's the honest part. Every constraint I wrote into the prompt, it shipped. Particle counts, devicePixelRatio cap, reduced-motion fallback. Not one missed. Anything that needed someone to actually look at the render, it had no idea. The five workflow nodes sit 70px apart, center to center. The circles are 72px wide. The last three pairs overlap. I moved them by hand. This isn't a model you hand strategy to. It's a tireless workhorse. The sharper your instructions, and the more of them a machine can check, the better it holds. Agents have been hyped for two years without landing. The blocker was never intelligence. One run just cost more than paying a person. My setup now: flagship plans, this one executes, and I keep a verification step in between. Tiering your models is the real edge in 2026. Still free right now. 256K context, tool calling on. Take the repetitive, structured, verifiable work off your plate and move it over for two days. Save the budget and your attention for what actually needs thinking. Stop using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. #AI# #Agents# #LLM#
Show more
Stop waiting for a smarter model. The agent era starts the day execution costs hit the floor. Ling-3.0-flash quietly showed up on OpenRouter. 124B total params, 5.1B active. No launch event, no marketing push, it just appeared. Output quality matches some flagship models, roughly half the token cost of Claude, and a full commented code block lands the second you hit enter. Spent three days throwing every task I didn't want to do at it: ▫️ 30-page product doc into a structured table. Fewer field errors than when I do it by hand. ▫️ Bug fix spanning 5 files. It wrote the test cases too. ▫️ A 963-line single-file SaaS landing page in one shot. Glassmorphism, particle field, interactive workflow, all of it. I read that landing page line by line. Here's the honest part. Every constraint I wrote into the prompt, it shipped. Particle counts, devicePixelRatio cap, reduced-motion fallback. Not one missed. Anything that needed someone to actually look at the render, it had no idea. The five workflow nodes sit 70px apart, center to center. The circles are 72px wide. The last three pairs overlap. I moved them by hand. This isn't a model you hand strategy to. It's a tireless workhorse. The sharper your instructions, and the more of them a machine can check, the better it holds. Agents have been hyped for two years without landing. The blocker was never intelligence. One run just cost more than paying a person. My setup now: flagship plans, this one executes, and I keep a verification step in between. Tiering your models is the real edge in 2026. Still free right now. 256K context, tool calling on. Take the repetitive, structured, verifiable work off your plate and move it over for two days. Save the budget and your attention for what actually needs thinking. Stop using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. #AI# #Agents# #LLM#
Show more