I'm openly no admirer of the Royal Family, yet the death of Princess Diana remains one of those rare moments etched into everyone's memory. Everyone remembers exactly where they were when the news broke. I was a child on holiday in Greece and the entire hotel seemed to just stop; guests went to the foyer to watch the TV and stood in stunned silence. People then began to weep and were holding one another for comfort. I remember it clearly. Even those who were not British felt the weight of it, as that was the measure of her reach and I feel something essential has been missing from the public square ever since. That Harry and his odious wife continue, to this day, to trade upon the memory of her death reveals everything you need to know about their character. Those who would anoint Meghan Markle as Diana 2.0 are mistaken. She possesses neither the grace, the decorum, nor the honesty that Diana had in the tip of one fingernail. True, Diana was elevated to near sainthood after her death, though she was never an angel. Still, the manner of her dying remains heartbreaking. R.I.P.

Britain Is Changing One Minute at a Time. Nobody Asked Us. Somewhere in Britain today, once every minute, a stamp is placed on a document and settlement or citizenship changes hands. Nearly 200,000 people received indefinite leave to remain this year, a 16-year record. A quarter of a million more became citizens. Shabana Mahmood is preparing reforms to slow this. Her own backbenchers are already working to gut them before they pass, exempting care workers and refusing to apply the rules retrospectively, so the 1.2 million migrants already approaching eligibility will sail through regardless of what Parliament decides. The government cannot explain this contradiction because there isn't a clean one to give. Its own forecasters, the ONS, say Britain needs net migration near 230,000 a year simply to stop the working-age population collapsing before 2030, a figure they themselves call historically high and massively unpalatable. Two thirds of the public want it below 100,000. Ministers are therefore asking a shrinking, ageing workforce to fund immigration on a scale the public has repeatedly rejected. The OBR has already done the sum the government won't say aloud. Low-skilled migrants cost more in public spending than they contribute in tax over a lifetime. Yet the visa data shows precisely this pattern taking root. Just 3.3 per cent of Zimbabwean workers have left Britain since arriving, 4 per cent of Nigerians and 4.5 per cent of Ghanaians. Compare that with 61 per cent of Saudis, 40 per cent of Belgians and 39 per cent of Germans. The routes Britain opened widest were those feeding the care sector at minimum wage, and they are the routes people do not leave. This was a conscious decision, repeated year after year, by governments that knew the costs. And the consequences are not confined to spreadsheets. Mass immigration on this scale, without the integration needed to bind people into a common society, changes the character of the country itself. It alters the language, customs, schools, neighbourhoods and town centres around us. It changes what is taught, what is spoken, what is celebrated and what is regarded as normal. Most seriously, it weakens the shared culture and common assumptions that allow millions of people, many of whom have never met, to feel they nevertheless belong to the same country. This did not happen by accident. Successive governments expanded migration routes, lowered barriers and encouraged recruitment from abroad while repeatedly ignoring warnings about housing, public services, wages, integration and social cohesion. They knew millions of newcomers would permanently change the composition of the population. They knew integration was not keeping pace. They carried on regardless. Mahmood's reforms will pass in some diminished form, applying to almost no one already here. The dependency ratio will keep tightening. The country that has changed will not simply change back. Lowering the inflow does not undo the transformation already created. There is no minister, in this government or the one before it, who has ever stood before the country and said plainly: this is the scale of immigration we have chosen, this is what it will do to our economy, our communities and our national identity, and this is the price we are asking you to pay. That reckoning never came. The price was simply spent, a minute at a time, until there was nothing left to ask permission for. "They knew millions of newcomers would permanently change the composition of the population. They knew integration was not keeping pace. They carried on regardless."

As promised, here we have "Elle Marie", who is very much a pretty girl, and woe betide any of you transphobic bigots who say otherwise. Never mind that he likes to watch women out and about doing normal things and then make videos of him staring at them doing those normal things and saying it "hurts so bad" because he's so deeply jealous of them and insecure because he missed out on "growing up as a girl". Not worrying. At all. 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

I remember Russell Lloyd-Moyle, former Brighton MP, telling the House of Commons that we should teach children how to strangle themselves safely for sexual pleasure. His cousin had sadly killed himself accidentally by auto-asphyxia, aged 15. Just because men enjoy a sexual practice doesn’t mean that we should all get behind it and teach it to children. We can talk about the risks, and then say no. No is a full sentence and is what children need to hear. As with injecting heroin, or speeding the wrong way along a motorway without a seat belt, there is no safe way to do it. It kills you or damages your brain, causes anoxia or stroke, and clots from torn carotid arteries, and the answer is no. No. Reassuring children that you can get away with it by getting good at it is setting them up for an adrenaline-chasing compulsion, and to ever-riskier execution of it. Young women, girls, even, are getting dragged into unbelievably risky acts for the pleasure of boys and men. There is no pleasure for women in anal sex or strangulation, except in extreme BDSM, and they cause life-changing disability. Women’s skin is more likely to tear or give way under trauma, and men now fetishise anal prolapse, which they call “rose budding.” What is that like to live with permanently? And permanent faecal incontinence in your twenties? Strangulation is now the second leading cause of stroke in young women - this means permanent brain damage, and a higher risk of future strokes and seizures over time. This is a wicked burden for young women to bear in the service of male sexuality. If these practices were pleasurable to women, lesbians would be already doing them. They aren’t.

I've already had the difficult conversations with my teen, but today I found out that sexual strangulation is also referred to as a "hand necklace". Depending upon the "technique used", there's variants. "Two finger necklace" "Five finger necklace" And of course. The "choke me Daddy meme". (Which I'm not posting). What the actual fuck are we doing?

Strangling girls and women isn’t “play” Barry. Doesn’t matter how long men have been trying to kill women during sex- it’s still not a game. I would tell @HeadWarriorTWM myself but I’m blocked obviously.

Well, this has everything, doesn't it? Paedophilia Autogynephilia Lopping off healthy body parts. Public exhibitionism. Age play and infantilism. 🏳️‍🌈 Pride 2026 everyone! 🏳️‍🌈 This book is still available on Amazon. Check the reading age it's directed at... Both my grandads are sadly no longer here but they'd sure have something to say about this abomination. 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

These are the words of a woman that asked me to share this: I am a straight woman in my 50s. I have been having sex with men since the late 1980s. In all that time I have never ONCE had a man’s hands around my neck during consensual sex albeit making love intimately 1/9

@Lifeofpuck07 @SkyDalby37773 @beanschicken1 My female anatomy doesn’t possess consciousness independently of me, so I tend not to ask my ovaries questions they can’t answer. Could you explain the term ‘full, gendered embodiment’?

The algorithm gave me this after I was speaking about concerts being inundated with those silently filming on their phones... I've seen Carl Cox live a few times and I have no photos or videos, because I was too busy dancing and actually enjoying myself. Same last week when I went to see the Weeknd. The production here is great, but just look at when the beat drops and there's just...nothing. Just a sea of mobile phones 💔

Many women struggling with menopause symptoms can't access HRT due to widespread shortages or can't afford to buy it privately, yet men are routinely prescribed it in much higher doses to affirm their gender identity. This is completely insane.