zk tech has come a long way over the years and especially sp1 by @SuccinctLabs which I am using in my prototype for the @MancerXYZ keeper network. this enables you to create price protection based on previous blocks without spending much in gas. the trade off is the cost to run a prover and time to generate proofs which isn’t actually that bad. especially at scale.

One major issue for ethereum:0x999b49c0d1612e619a4a4f6280733184da025108 right now is that there is no way to get slonks in exchange for slop because the void is empty and no one wants the void their slonks because it economically doesn’t make sense. I’m going to fix this.

Base has a trust problem now. Not a chain-is-dead problem. A narrative problem. Coinbase spent years presenting Base as the friendly public square for crypto builders, wrapped in the wider Stand With Crypto posture. Then the content-coin experiment soured, leadership admitted the social thesis failed, and Robinhood Chain arrived looking exactly like what it is: an investment hub building financial rails, not a movement trying to look altruistic. That bluntness matters. Base still has serious DeFi TVL and real infrastructure. Robinhood Chain is barely out of the gate. But crypto trust is not just TVL; it is whether users believe the incentives being sold to them match the incentives underneath. My piece: why Base’s trust problem is Robinhood Chain’s opening — and why HOODL is an early, factual experiment rather than proof of migration. See URL below 👇 #StandWithCrypto# #DeFi#

I’m genuinely bullish on HOODL — not as hype, but as an early test of whether Robinhood Chain can turn long-term participation into something users actually understand and want to hold. Early, yes. Interesting, absolutely. #HOODL#