Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

๐“๐—๐Œ๐‚
@TXMCtrades
@alphabetasoup_ -- Relentlessly curious -- I read a lot -- Big mouth -- Student of history -- Bitcoin
338 Following    94.4K Followers
EU: We should force our savers to invest here. UK: We should force our savers to invest here. JP: We should force our savers to invest here. AU: We should force our savers to invest here. Wake up, anon. They couldn't be any more clear about where this is headed.
Show more
The eternal meme
JUST IN: ECB Executive Board member calls for central bank money to move onto the blockchain
These funds were rerouted from their original purpose to fund a surveillance state, and there wasn't a single public announcement made. Nor was there any talk of cameras and drones when the bill to raise these funds was originally considered. Now we have thousands of these cameras in our towns and neighborhoods.
Show more
About those Flock camerasโ€ฆ Whoโ€™s paying for them? You are. State lawmakers added $1 to Texansโ€™ car insurance policies. That money paid for thousands of Flock cameras.
Show more
We are now only one step away from our childhood dreams becoming a reality
BREAKING: President Donald J. Trump just signed an Executive Order establishing a new federal academy, THE UNITED STATES SPACE ACADEMY. ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
This is the correct take
@mattkita Worst thing the US could ever do to Bitcoin is go back to sound money.
The gravity for rates is
10Y yield is now higher than when Bessent made his comment about bond buybacks.
โฌ‡๏ธ Unemployment Rate โฌ‡๏ธ Labor Force โฌ‡๏ธ Job Growth โฌ†๏ธ Vacancies
Today's pause on immigrant visas closes down a legal pathway that has typically brought 40,000-60,000 people into the US per month. The pause is reportedly temporary, but State Dept gave no timeline for reopening. It's possible the US population shrinks in the next few months.
Show more
China's surplus is becoming a collective action problem for the rest of the industrial world. If America alone closes its market, Chinese production spills more heavily into Europe, Canada, Latin America, etc. Ip's proposal of a new Plaza Accord for the yuan is similar to Michael Pettis' call for a customs union. Both ideas speak to the same conclusion: coordinated refusal to continue absorbing China's surplus. Failure to do risks the entire Western effort toward reindustrializing, especially in the U.S. where the location of productive capacity is increasingly a national security question rather than a purely economic one. This is why America increasingly wants more unified policing from allies in its trade negotiations. The system has to change.
Show more
Just a fun little cute little neat little graphic of the fiscal spiral. Yearly average of net treasury issuance by decade. We are in an era of clown-like figures, and they will probably be at least twice this large in the 2030s.
Show more
Agree with this comparison from @fejau_inc
AI may be repeating cryptoโ€™s biggest 2021 valuation mistake. @fejau_inc argues frontier models look a lot like the old fat-L1 thesis: huge valuations built on the assumption that infrastructure captures most of the value, even as competition commoditizes the underlying layer.
Show more
100% with you, brother
@TXMCtrades yep. people need to realize we don't really have a US President anymore. Just the salesman It's been 'continuity of agenda' for a very long time. And then they do all these illusions of left vs right . Keeps people in tribalism and opposed to each other; instead of on them
Show more
Warsh: "We must be confident inflation is moving to our objective." Also Warsh, 5 seconds earlier: "...65 months of sustained, elevated inflation..."
Warsh once again vomits a bunch of slick words while saying nothing of substance. Think we're at a point where he has no market credibility, esp since he has a loooonnngggg public record of being an inflation hawk absolutist. He literally just blows hot air.
Show more
Warsh once again vomits a bunch of slick words while saying nothing of substance. Think we're at a point where he has no market credibility, esp since he has a loooonnngggg public record of being an inflation hawk absolutist. He literally just blows hot air.
Show more
The US govt has been trying to get Europe to handle more of its own defense for years. It is not a Trump policy. The Biden admin was in many ways as a continuation of Trump's views on a variety of topics, namely China. The two parties are much more in sync on these issues than folks might assume. Sure the tone of public discourse might change without Trump in the White House, but the direction of travel is well established. The sooner Europe realizes this, the better.
Show more
Europeans would be well advised to believe that positions like those of @jekavanagh & @JustinTLogan will gain currency with post-Trump administrations regardless of whether Republican or Democrat. And act accordingly working towards taking ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บdefense fully into European hands.
Show more
Alternative: the U.S. can possibly "grow its way out" of the debt by juicing nominal GDP via inflation while simultaneously forcing their savings institutions to buy (and keep) govt bonds at yields they'd otherwise not want them at, whilst engaging controls on capital outflows and limiting domestic borrowing for any industries outside those deemed strategically important. Would it work? Theoretically yes, but would be deeply politically unpopular to attempt without first engineering a severe enough crisis. Would it be messy? You're god damn right. And it's more likely a pathway than that of raising taxes and meaningfully cutting spending.
Show more
NO, THE US CANNOT GROW ITS WAY OUT OF ITS DEBT PROBLEMS Over the past couple of weeks we have heard US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent say again and again that the plan is to raise US GDP growth, and that this will solve the country's debt problems. US President Trump has said the same thing repeatedly for the past year and a half. But is it actually possible? I have run the numbers. The chart below shows the NOMINAL US GDP growth required to stabilise federal public debt as a share of GDP, given the total stock of debt, the level of interest rates and the public deficit. The red line is the "required" nominal GDP growth if debt is to be stabilised as a share of GDP. When actual nominal GDP growth (the green line) falls below the red line, debt rises as a share of GDP. We can see that over the past 25 years the "required" growth rate has been almost permanently above actual nominal GDP growth. Right now the calculations show that if Bessent is to stabilise the debt, we need nominal GDP growth of 7.2%. And if the Federal Reserve is to hold inflation below 2% at the same time, we need real growth above 5% PERMANENTLY to keep the debt stable. It ought to be obvious to anyone that this is completely impossible. But there is of course an alternative, which is to raise nominal GDP growth through higher inflation, because from a debt perspective it makes no difference whether growth comes from inflation or from real growth. It would simply mean that the Fed would have to abandon its 2% target and accept markedly higher inflation. The Congressional Budget Office estimates potential real GDP growth in the US at around 2.2%, so to reach nominal GDP growth of 7.2% we would need permanent US inflation of 5%. That is of course an option - the Fed just has to print some more money. The problem is that when nominal GDP growth rises, interest rates tend over time to follow nominal GDP growth quite closely. And worse still: if markets grow nervous that an attempt is being made to inflate away the debt problems, market rates will shoot up immediately and only make the problem worse. So the answer is quite clear. The US cannot grow its way out of its debt problems. There is no other route - taxes have to go up and/or public spending has to come down. The question is whether the US as a nation is capable of making those choices today. I am personally becoming more and more doubtful.
Show more
If we consider that most recessions cause the deficit to roughly triple we will be looking at 18-20% deficits to GDP in the next downturn. Biblical shit.
Level of collective madness is now unhingedโ€ฆ tariffs and gambling the funding structure are now the required artifice to sustain insane levels of totally useless military spending and just about keep the deficit at 6%. What if a recession hits? Where will the deficit be?
Show more
Miran: "Permanently wider deficits would be a different story, but that's not the case here." The Deficit: "Hold my beer."
The old global order is changing because the incentives that sustained it are beginning to unravel. Today I'm starting a new series exploring why. The Post-War Bargain.
Show more