I have tabled a parliamentary motion officially calling on the Government to recognise and protect English, Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish ethnicities as distinct historic identities. We should never be ashamed to defend who we are. All MPs have been invited to support.

A Reform Member of the Senedd, Joe Martin, has been banned from speaking in the Welsh Parliament until he apologises for claiming white people are being replaced in the UK. He is absolutely right to highlight the scale of change forced on the British people through mass immigration, and I respect him for having the balls to say it. Others in Reform want nothing to do with the crisis facing us all - Farage has explicitly said he is not bothered about the scale of demographic change. Tice famously said he would be 'long gone', so it's not his problem. Joe Martin is right. They are wrong. There is nothing racist about discussing these concerns, which are shared by many millions of people. To those who question the scale of change? Go to Birmingham. Luton. East London. Bradford. It is undeniable, and it is out of control. Joe must not apologise, and he has my full backing.

I had a very decent political dinner, gave a Chatham House rules speech - well received. Tomorrow is Armistice Day. We will do more than remember, we will restore this Britain that our veterans fought for and that our armed forces protect today. Join us at

What many people in the UK do not yet fully realise is that: A) the nature of war has evolved and continues to do so. It is far more sophisticated, occurs in a great deal more dimensions than is commonly understood, and is not always about guns and bullets. Kinetic warfare is one means available to an aggressor, but far from the only one, and rarely, if ever, are the various means employed singly. Modern warfare is multi-dimensional and invariably asymmetric. B) While we are not presently at war, we are certainly not at peace. There is a constant and persistent contest, both offensive and defensive, going on. Some actors are seek to dominate, disrupt and gain advantage, other actors are constantly defending against them. C) Some elements of that contest are unaffected by borders. D) Effective defence often necessitates limited offence.

YOU WILL NOT BELIEVE YOUR EYES READ ON ....... This is Mohammed Mizanur Rahman 43 years old a convicted terrorist and former right hand man of Anjem Choudary and he's radicalising teenagers on Tik Tok from a three bed COUNCIL FLAT IN ENFIELD worth around £300,000 paid for by us the British taxpayers ! Not only that but hes yards from primary school where our children go! In 2007 he was jailed for 4 years after being filmed at a rally shouting " We want to see their blood running in the streets of Bagdad, we want to see their tanks burn in a way we burn their flags" In 2016 he and Choudary pledged allegiance to Islamic State and got 5 and a half years each only . Choudary is now serving life . Rhaman was released in 2018 and while inside collected £1,300 COMPENSATION from the Ministry of Justice over a Belmarsh strip search . Security expert Anthony Glees says strip searches are standard in cases like this and he shouldn't have been paid. Since his release Rahman has used TikTok to call Muslim police "greedy sinners" urge Muslim's not to vote , claim jailed extremist's were locked up for " reading magazines and holding placards" and sells books including The Muslims Teachers Handbook aimed at children as young as 4 years old calling for JIHAD OF THE SWORD! TikTok banned his accounts after press inquiries He says it wont stop him! You seriously could not make this all up could you!

To all politicians allegedly representing the security and defence of our nation: "Do not stand at the Cenotaph, bow your head and speak solemnly of sacrifice if you are not prepared to defend the freedoms for which those men and women gave their lives. Remembrance is not a ceremony or photo opportunity to be performed once a year. It is a responsibility carried every day of your political life." @LeeHarris @danwootton

The Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT) should be carried by all police officers. I have long said that police patrol officers in the UK are inadequately trained and equipped to deal with traumatic injuries to themselves. I suspect senior commanders and bean counters have argued that paramedics would rapidly be on scene, but if I’m bleeding out I, like a soldier, need the kit to control it immediately, not in 5 minutes! We make much of wanting our armed forces to be adequately equipped, a Restore Britain government would ensure they are. But, we must do the same for all police officers as well.@PoliceChiefs @PFEW_HQ Read our plan for Restoring British Policing here:

The FCDO, like other departments and the civil service as a whole, requires the most almighty shake up. These “observances” are a bad joke. By their nature they are exclusive, they are entirely unrelated to the task of the civil service and undermine effectiveness. They cost time and money. If you want to be an activist do not join the civil service, the emergency services, the armed forces, teaching or healthcare. Those careers are for professionals who put their jobs before their politics.

It looks like one of the Polish officers applied a tourniquet to his right arm. It may have saved his life. All British police officers should be issued and should be required to carry a Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT) and haemostatic gauze on them, a trauma kit in the car, and be properly trained in their use. Shockingly, that is not presently the case. @PFEW_HQ @PoliceChiefs @ukhomeoffice @ShabanaMahmood

Krakow - My prayers are with those killed and wounded, their families and all involved. Never forget, there are men and women out there who run towards the danger, confront it and say “You shall not pass!”. They are the shield behind which the rest of us live. They stand between those who would do harm and those to whom they would do it. They are the guardians, and, with Remembrance Day in the UK tomorrow, let’s remember that such people get hurt, are often killed, but do it anyway. They fight to protect their country and their people. They deserve our deepest respect. 🇬🇧🇵🇱🙏

I want to address an allegation directly, because Reform politicians seem determined to spread the idea that I am somehow working in coordination with the Conservative Party and Kemi Badenoch. Yes, I was a member of the Conservative Party. In 1993. My children have since been born and grown up. It was more than thirty years ago. Literally, a lifetime ago. Many of the Reform leadership certainly can’t say the same. Yes, I've met Kemi Badenoch. I speak to her occasionally. I like her personally. We have worked together in Parliament. She spoke positively about our rape gang inquiry, and I thanked her for it. Numerous Conservative MPs have supported my parliamentary work, including our inquiry. Esther McVey. Nick Timothy. Jack Rankin. Peter Bedford. I could go on. I am not going to apologise for that. I will work with anyone in Parliament who is prepared to help deliver meaningful change. We have achieved results by doing precisely that. Does that mean I forgive the Conservatives for what they did to Britain between 2010 and 2024? Absolutely not. It was a betrayal. I have literally established a national political party to fight them at the ballot box. I am delighted when we beat them, which is a growing amount. All that should be a fairly substantial clue… But opposing a political party does not require you to behave like a petulant child towards every single person associated with it. Conservative MPs believed I would do a good job on the Public Accounts Committee. I accepted the opportunity to scrutinise government spending and fight for British taxpayers. Again, absolutely no apologies. I think we have delivered results. Now let's compare that with Reform. Reform tried to have me imprisoned over false allegations. I would be in prison today if they had their way. Despite everything, I have repeatedly attempted to work with Reform MPs in Parliament. I have invited them to support initiatives, collaborate on important issues and help deliver results. Time and again, those invitations have been ignored. My emails don’t even get a reply. I happily sign their motions and support their efforts, I did earlier this week. The feeling is not mutual. They complain. They moan. They attack. They endlessly manufacture personal grievances. But ask them to put their animosities aside and actually achieve something together? Suddenly, it's total silence. I've received more constructive support in Parliament from Labour MPs than from Reform. Think about that. It is grievance politics at its most pathetic. Negative, unproductive and deeply unprofessional. My position is incredibly straightforward. At elections, we are opponents. In Parliament, we have a responsibility to get things done. I believe that is what our constituents want us to do. Maybe I’m wrong, but I think not. Reform claim we stand in more local council Reform seats than anyone else. Yes, because so many more Reform councillors resign in disgrace than any other party. We are moving towards standing in 100% of local council by-elections. We’ve stood in Reform seats, Labour seats, Tory seats. Everywhere and anywhere. I intend to fight both Reform and the Conservatives for every vote. I want Restore Britain to win over millions of people who previously voted for those parties. But that does not mean I have to insult everyone I disagree with, refuse to speak to political opponents or sabotage decent initiatives because somebody else might receive a little credit. I was elected to represent my constituents, not to participate in an endless Westminster playground feud. Do I like Kemi Badenoch and some other Conservative MPs personally? Yes. Will I work with them when it benefits the British people? Yes. Do I fundamentally oppose the Conservative Party's record and want Restore Britain to defeat them electorally? Yes. Their 14 years of power was an utter betrayal, and is largely responsible for the social, economic and demographic vandalism we have endured. All three things can be true. Any serious adult should be capable of understanding that. It is not difficult to comprehend. I will work with Conservatives. I will work with Labour. I will work with Reform, if they ever decide to behave constructively. Reform's increasingly nasty, brash and personally unpleasant approach to politics says far more about them than it does about me. It’s just downright rude. They seem to believe that refusing to work with anyone is a demonstration of strength. In my view, it’s a weakness that erodes our politics and fails our constituents. I have said it again and again. I will work with anyone in parliament to deliver for the British people. And I make no apologies for doing so.

The Home Office welcomes endless dangerous third world scumbags, yet bans Eva Vlaardingerbroek from entering our country to attend a Restore Britain event. So many people need to go to prison.

Restore Britain - SENSIBLE: Give parents five school days for family time without a holiday fine. Restore Britain, the political party led by Rupert Lowe, proposes up to five days of authorised family leave per pupil each school year, chosen by parents whose children are attending and progressing satisfactorily. A family holiday involves more than finding a blank square on the school calendar. Parents need time off work, somewhere suitable to stay and a price they can pay. Restore Britain's case recognises the working parent who cannot simply book leave whenever school closes. Its school-fines policy draws on testimony about the difficulty of matching holidays to leave in the NHS and other essential jobs. A school can close for the summer without every parent being free to stop work at the same time. The party also considers disabled children whose families struggle to find suitable holiday accommodation during school breaks. For those families, the question includes whether a place will meet their child's needs, rather than just whether a room is available. A little freedom over dates can give parents another way to fit those needs together. Cost matters too. Restore Britain argues that school holiday prices put trips beyond the reach of families who could afford to go during term time. Allowing different dates would give those parents a wider choice of holidays to compare. It would also remove a particularly sour calculation: whether a cheaper break is still worth taking after a fine. Family leave should be something parents can plan openly within a clear allowance. The useful word in Restore Britain's proposal is “authorised”. The party is proposing to change which absences are allowed, so qualifying family time would have a recognised place in the school year. The party's examples extend beyond a week away to a day trip or an agricultural show. That matters because family time does not have to mean a flight, a resort or an expensive holiday package. Parents may value a particular day together, and the proposal gives them room to make that choice. Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain are right to leave room for parents to choose the day that matters to their family.

Restore Britain - PRACTICAL: Cut the taxes on running a pub and help closed locals reopen. Restore Britain’s plan to support British pubs starts with a simple truth: affection for the local does not pay its bills. Rupert Lowe, the party’s leader, backs a package that tackles the money taken from pub sales, the cost of employing staff and the difficulty of finding investment when a pub needs rescuing. That deserves support because these pressures meet in the same business, often behind the same bar. A full room is not the same as a healthy business. The money customers hand over has to cover stock, staff, the building and the taxes attached to trading before the landlord has anything left to put back into the pub. Restore Britain proposes cutting VAT on hospitality sales from 20% to 12.5%. VAT is the tax included in the price customers pay, so the proposal addresses the money passing through the till rather than waiting until a business makes a profit. It would give the operator more room to decide how to keep the business working: through prices, wages, repairs or some combination of them. The next part concerns business rates, the tax charged on commercial premises. Restore Britain calls for the restoration of 40% relief and a freeze on changes to the property values used to calculate those bills. This addresses a different pressure from VAT. The building still costs money when the room is quiet, and a pub needs space for customers even when every table is not occupied. Keeping a place open for a slower afternoon can be part of what makes it a useful local. Staffing is another reason the measures belong together. Restore Britain proposes lifting the earnings threshold at which employers start paying National Insurance for hospitality staff, alongside changes intended to make the charge work better for seasonal employment. It also proposes rewards for apprentices completing training and for apprentices and employers who stay together afterwards. Training someone takes time from people already doing the job, and the value grows when that person stays long enough to use what they have learned. Then comes a harder question: what about the pub whose doors are already shut? A trading tax cut cannot, by itself, provide the money needed to reopen a building. Restore Britain therefore proposes extending tax incentives for private investment into closed or struggling pubs. The purpose is to help fund reopening, refurbishment and changes to the business, rather than simply paying off debt or buying an asset. Repairing the kitchen, making the building usable and giving people a reason to return are different tasks from completing a property deal. Lowe and Restore Britain are right to connect the rescue of a pub with the business that must operate inside it. Their plan also considers rewards for pubs that host community events such as quizzes and charity nights. That idea remains something to explore, rather than a benefit already available, but its purpose fits the rest of the package. A local earns its place through what people can actually do there: meet, eat, work, learn a trade or put on an event together. Restore Britain’s strongest case for supporting pubs is the connection between those two things: help the business keep trading, and give a closed local a route back to serving people.