This is repulsive from Erika Kirk’s attorney. Tyler Robinson has not been convicted, yet the attorney calls him Charlie Kirk’s murderer and “assassin,” as if guilt is established. The defense is criticized for reviewing 31,000 documents too slowly, for legal costs, and for “conspiracy theorists, trolls, click-chasers, and rage-baiters” undermining confidence. Presumption of innocence, due process, and an adequate defense are judicial foundations, not inconveniences for a faster trial. Erika Kirk may seek justice, but it is not a predetermined guilty verdict. If the evidence is overwhelming, why deny the defense time to review it? This rhetoric has no place over facts and constitutional protections. The attorney should be sanctioned from further statements; misrepresenting and trying to silence discussion (like Nancy Grace) is wrong. Public discussion of an ongoing case is normal, and using it as leverage is disgusting. Thank you @baroncoleman for pointing this out… no one else is talking about it. Let’s start pinpointing the gaslighting from her defense attorneys, as this isn’t helping her, Charlie’s, or Robinson’s rights. It should be stricken from the legal filing ASAP.