some interesting facts about Impeccable for PRs: - much more advanced version of "/impeccable critique" and "/impeccable audit" - slots right into your ai bugbot dev workflow (if you're already using Greptile, CodeRabbit etc, your agent will simply pick up on it and your UX auto-improves) - much more powerful than some skill that estimates what your code would look like when rendered. spins up real browser environments, logs in, looks at before/after... - AI repository analysis makes sure it understands your design system (and changes to it over time), and your target audience, and constructs simulated personas from it who test every new feature (yes, with actual voiceovers and videos!) we've worked on this for a couple of months and have been using it on our own internal repos for many weeks. it's @renaissgeek's first commercial product. very excited to have you try it.

engineering is moving 10x faster. design review hasn't caught up. introducing Impeccable ..for PRs! a design review agent that simulates your users, uses your app, finds friction & slop. Impeccable’s design judgment in every PR. reply if you want in on the closed beta 👀

Product people of SF! On Sep 22 we're hosting an event with the incredible @pbakaus (Founder of @impeccable_ai) and @moeamaya (Founder of @operatecrm). If you care about creativity and craft and want to hang out with some of the best design talent in the Bay Area, don’t miss this one!

If you're interested in the origin story of Impeccable and the philosophy of it, here's my talk on the subject from @aiDotEngineer world fair a couple months back (finally online!):

The old Impeccable site was flashy. For a design toolkit, I wanted something calmer, cleaner, and more elegant. So I redesigned it, rewrote the docs, and added more ways to explore, learn, and experiment. Thanks @Abdul_wahab_one for helping me bring it over the finish line. Here’s a quick tour.

judging from the popularity of this tweet, it's great that at least a few humans seem to care about the faith of humanity! on the other hand, the discourse (and the other follow-ups) is braindead even for X' usual low bar, ranging from "it's very financially irresponsible to warn folks about skynet taking over right before skynet's IPO" to "you're dumb it's just next token prediction". i wish everyone would go through a quick thought experiment like "hey if AI has access to all our infrastructure, and suddenly isn't aligned to humans but maybe nature, the planet, or something like that, would that be bad?", which, i'd hope, would be lead to a pretty sobering 'oh.'

GPT 6 Astra's software development's performance (super spiky/random) is probably the best case for graph engineering I've seen yet. Run the same challenging task 5x, and you get: - 3x: a stick figure - 2x: god-tier Michelangelo So do that, then let a 5.6 judge pick the best.

this is very cool but the voiceover is incredibly…um…optimistic. no, this will not replace the need for stable user interfaces. cute demos like these dramatically misunderstand, or worse, belittle UI design. and this is commentary from somebody who loves the vision of generative ui (I own the domain

those who try to shame you for attempting inbox zero live a pitiful existence there’s nothing more critical for mental load than closing open loops, and every read-but-unanswered email is an open loop that will live somewhere in your brain rent free. inbox zero ftw

Welcoming Paul Bakaus @pbakaus, founder of Renaissance Geek @impeccable_ai, and a product engineer before it was cool. Speaking at Abstract Conference. Sept 2nd

what’s interesting about this is that it doesn’t really work often, especially not for frontend development. there is a hard ceiling for what a model like gpt 5.6 can accomplish, and when it realizes that it cannot move the needle on a harsh judging agent, it will simply give up.

how do design tools like claude design and other newer canvas based tools, the new /design command compare with @impeccable_ai? this is a common question, so i figured i’ll provide you with an answer: i see claude’s design tooling primarily used as a prototyping tool for early exploration, or for designing one-off documents. Impeccable, on the other hand, was born because I needed a daily driver to help me expand and improve the design in a large production web app. these are very different jobs to be done. many impeccable users prototype something in a canvas or claude artifact, and then use impeccable to finalize and iterate on their designs.