As someone who has spoken with
@andyyen multiple times and really respects what he has built
@ProtonPrivacy, I was quite shocked and skeptical of the 404Media article (a publication I actually like on a lot of topics, FWIW).
Having more context here makes this even clearer that Andy (while if I'm honest I don't love his tone/approach in some of this) is doing one of the hardest things those of us leading engineering companies are having to do right now -- wrestle with the most drastic and important transition in how software development has worked in decades, and help the engineers we employ and appreciate through that transition at the same time.
I actually almost entirely agree with Andy's AI manifesto as well. The world of "hand-chiseling" code being the proper way to approach software dev in every case is over, and we cannot go back to it even if we want to. There will still be some cases where we need to slow down and use extreme caution + additional human review (i.e. cryptography, entropy generation, etc.) but we've seen how simply not using AI for those tasks at all is equally dangerous as well.
For those like me who love product/design but don't love coding, this is an incredibly empowering time and a ton of fun.
For those (like many of you reading this, I'm sure!) who love coding and probably don't love product/design, this is an existential crisis and takes away something you love. That sucks, and I wish we still had a choice long term to put the AI genie back in the bottle, but for better or worse that isn't going to happen.
This is an insane time to be alive, and just like other monumental transitions many people will be thrilled and excited by it, many will be fearful and skeptical of it, and the hard job of a CXO is to manage all of that while being sure he drives his company to use the best and most effective path as he sees it.