🎤Juice=Juice on Hong Kong’s “CHILL CLUB”! 🌟 They performed “Hitoride Ikirare-sou tte Sorettenee, Hometeiruno?” and “Shinogono Iwazu Satto Wakarete Ageta”✨ #JuiceJuice# #HelloProject# #CHILLCLUB# #JPop# #idol# #HongKong# @JuiceJuice_uf

👉Aethir organization As shown in the figure, @AethirCloud has five layers in terms of organizational structure. And the core members are as follows: 1 Chairman of the board, James  Rob(Luo Weiyu）  2 CEO,Daneil Wang 3 CMO,Joe    CSO, Marc Rydon   CTO，Kyle Okamoto   CRO，Pau Thindl  4 -5 Middle-level executives  🎆Board of directors: James Rob ，Daniel Wang ，Eric Hendrik Marc 👉Entities associated with Aethir 1 Token issuing entity of Aethir DCI Foundation (foundation ID:25055620), incorporated in Panama on the 31st day of January 2024,  is the token issuing entity. 2 Three operating companies of Aethir as follows: 2.1 M1 Network Group Limited, incorporated in the Cayman Islands on the 12th day of January 2022 (registration number:385948); 2.2 Meta 1 Network Limited, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands on the 29th day of December 2021. (registration number:2086997); and 2.3 Meta 1 Network Pte. Ltd., incorporated in Singapore on the 16th day of October 2021 (registration number:202136107R). 3 Fundraising entity of Aethir Aethir's fundraising entity is its BVI entity — Meta 1 Network Limited. @AethirCloud @AethirEco @AethirEdge @MRRydon  @paulthind @JoeDataCap @DanielAethir  @0xNicky @princecryptow3 @Jochem_In_Space @Arp_it1 @0xngmi @functi0nZer0 @zachxbt @tier10k @CryptoCred @RookieXBT @Tradermayne @dubzyxbt @abetrade @icebagz_ @CryptoLady_M  @watacchikasou @lucianlamp @SOU_BTC @btcfx295 @cryptobaby @only1mrwhite  @crypticworld7 @brian_armstrong @CryptoHayes @CoinDesk @Cointelegraph @CoinMarketCap @TheBlockCo @Blockworks @ForbesCrypto @PeckShieldAlert  @BitcoinNews @binance @coinbase @upbitglobal @okx @krakenfx @bitfinex #aethir# #ath# #JamesLuo# #DanielWang#

wait wait so u are telling me PumpFun launched a $2.5M trading competition a squad took first place and they basically removed the PnL that made them win because their token was supposedly bundled? And this is the same PumpFun that was promoting $KIMCHI a week ago? LMAOOOO Okay, here’s what happened: PumpFun announces SQUADS - $1.5M for first place - $750K for second - $250K for third - rankings based on total spot PnL competition runs from October 26 to November 9 Chubbicorns takes first place Their squad is holding a token called “Fuck Pumpfun” launched through Standard Reserve Context: - 80% of the token supply is allocated to Standard Reserve Bank Charter holders - 867 wallets are involved in the distribution - tokens are held in a vault contract - holders must burn their Charter NFTs to claim them So this way no individual charter controls more than ~2M tokens PumpFun decides the token is “extremely bundled” Removes the PnL generated by that token from the leaderboard Chubbicorns goes from first place to #492# And yeah, here we go, people accuse PumpFun of changing the rules to exclude EVM tokens after Chubbicorns takes the lead json from PumpFun responds that EVM chains actually count (So EVM isn’t the problem) Apparently the problem is the bundle Except Standard Reserve argues that the 80% allocation wasn’t a coordinated bundle at all It was a vault distribution where holders had to burn an NFT to claim their tokens PumpFun then clarifies that Chubbicorns wasn’t technically disqualified They just removed the PnL that put them in first place Now let’s talk about $KIMCHI PumpFun promoted Kimchi’s token launch the deployer bought 79% of the supply three linked wallets turned ~$7.3K into ~$111.7K So let me get this straight PumpFun can promote a token where the deployer bought 79% of the supply But a token with 80% allocated through a vault to hundreds of Charter holders is too bundled to count? Yes, promoting a token and running a trading competition are different things But you see why people are questioning this, right? So who’s actually deciding the winners here?