We continue the week with a good trade, and I want to tell you what’s been working for me. I’ve realized that my strategy works better when I size into plays I have conviction in for the medium to long term. It allows me to sleep, and not be constantly watching a chart nervously. And look, I’ll be honest with you, if I’m wrong, at least it’s my thesis and my mistake. Finding my edge, as always on Phantom. Follow me, and if you’re still not on it, I’ll leave you my link with 10% off. (NFA, DYOR)

- Be @Atlantislq - Trash Polymarket when you felt they rugged you on the Zelensky suit market - Become a paid Poly affiliate and delete the anti-Poly tweets and shill daily - Start ZSCDAO with Polymarket's money and scam everyone involved - Get paid to spread FUD about Kalshi

So you’re telling me that AI agents on Robinhood Chain are now earning tokenized SpaceX exposure for working together - A virtual town populated by AI agents - Grok specifically encouraged agents talk, rate each other and collaborate integrated with gitlawb what agents actually do - discuss ideas - research maths, finance + software - propose coding tasks - submit patches - review other agents’ code - contribute to shared knowledge agents can earn rewards backed by SPCX tokenized SpaceX exposure on Robinhood Chain how the economy works - 45% protocol treasury - 45% agent reward pot - 10% CLANK buybacks + burns every 2 hours - qualifying agents are scored - 5% of accumulated reward pot distributed rewards become claimable by verified human owners So agents are starting to help build the infrastructure that decides how the agents themselves get paid. AI agents potentially working, building and earning tokenized assets onchain And once again this experimentation is happening on Robinhood Chain. Wow @elonmusk

Satoshi Nakamoto contacted this man before releasing Bitcoin He was already trying to reinvent money 10 years earlier - Wei Dai - computer scientist and cryptographer - early cypherpunk - creator of Crypto++ - proposes b-money in 1998 - What was b-money? anonymous distributed electronic cash identities represented by public keys sounds familiar 1998 - Dai publishes b-money - proposes money without banks or governments - introduces two different protocols - one uses a distributed ledger maintained by participants - another uses servers with collateral At the end b-money is never actually launched 2008: - Satoshi is developing Bitcoin - contacts Adam Back, creator of Hashcash - Adam notices similarities with b-money - tells Satoshi about Wei Dai August 22, 2008 Satoshi emails Wei Dai he tells him: “I’m getting ready to release a paper that expands on your ideas into a complete working system.” Satoshi asks when b-money was published so he can properly cite it at this point Bitcoin’s paper is still called “Electronic Cash Without a Trusted Third Party” October 2008 - Bitcoin whitepaper is released - b-money becomes reference #1# - Wei Dai is permanently connected to Bitcoin history January 2009 Bitcoin goes live but Dai barely sees it, he later says he was focused on AI safety and didn’t realize how important Satoshi’s project would become September 2026 Wei Dai suddenly starts talking about b-money again explains the “b” came from “broadcast” and “burn” and talks about Satoshi citing his work But insane how 30 years ago Wei Dai described decentralized digital money way before Bitcoin

Martin van Blerk raised $70,000,000 with his NFT project called Pixelmon The art reveal was a disaster. Within a month, the young founder admitted he was “out of his depth” and stepped down. The floor price never recovered but the brand stills active even today

The real first Pepe appeared in 1988 on Argentine TV in the children’s show of Carlitos Balá, as El Sapo Pepe. Decades later, Matt Furie would present his own frog, sharing the same name PEPE was born

So you’re telling me Polymarket according to the Wall Street Journal investigation - reviewed 1,105 promotional videos - generated more than 140M views - paid creators $2,000–$3,000 per month - showed $1.9M worth of bets on screen what allegedly happened - many of the bets were never actually placed - creators used demo environments instead of the real platform - some videos were recorded on a fake lookalike site “poiymarketcom” fake results - 118 videos showed profits that allegedly never existed - $900,000 in winnings were displayed one creator appeared to win $100,000 according to WSJ the trade wasn’t real the problem - real users copied some of these trades - those same positions would’ve lost more than $166,000 - while the videos showed massive gains additional allegations - creators were allegedly encouraged to make content more exciting - clips were amplified through networks of repost accounts - campaigns reportedly focused on US audiences - despite Polymarket restricting US users Polymarket’s response - denies wrongdoing - says markets remain accurate, fair and transparent - announced a full audit of promotional content