Everyone calls these TikTok kids cracked at trenching, yet I keep seeing them trade one-handed... WITH A MOUSE?? If mouse + two buttons is still the meta, I’m not convinced the 30+ crowd is as cooked as people think. Traders or terminals: where are the keyboard-first workflows?

My take is that @fomo needs to be careful here. They have a real early lead, but in crypto, APIs and integrations are distribution. If builders can’t build on top of you, they’ll build around you and route all that flow somewhere else. It won’t happen overnight, but I think staying closed will eventually cost them the advantage they have now.

Centering a div is now a solved problem Developers have been testing the fleX Alpha stealth model. today, we are announcing it as DIV-1 Flash DIV-1 Flash delivers frontier-level alignment at a fraction of the cost Full benchmarks bellow ↓

Today I read some code to remember what programming felt like before AI. You could open a codebase and instantly tell if the dev had taste. Sometimes you'd find something so clean you'd stop and admire it. Then I hit a 900-line component and closed nvim.

Distribution makes sense as Hookr’s moat. I still don’t understand the hook builder’s moat. Once the code is public and proven, what stops a launchpad from forking it, removing the fee and redeploying it?

I keep seeing people talk about pairing memecoins with tokenized stocks, and I feel like I'm missing something. The meme inherits some of the stock's price movement, but holders don't own the stock and the pairing doesn't create value by itself. What's the actual benefit?

this wild defcon talk is finally out researchers created a fake defi startup, hired lazarus it workers, put them into a sandbox and recorded their tooling, workflows, and faces from inside the operation starts at 5:46:09

Local AI people: what hardware stack actually replaces a $200/mo frontier coding subscription for a power user? I keep seeing setups with 1, 2, 3, 4 DGX Sparks, and the OSS models are getting really good. But most benchmarks/use cases still seem focused on running one chatbot/agent at a time. That’s not my workload. I’m running 2-8, sometimes 10, Codex instances in parallel. I need frontier-ish coding quality AND enough throughput for every session to stay fluid. Being able to fit a huge model is useless to me if it means ~20 tok/s and one useful session at a time. So what’s the actual hardware stack for this? Can stacked Sparks realistically handle that kind of concurrency, or does this basically require a proper multi-GPU setup? Feels like most “local AI” discussions optimize for what you can run, while I care a lot more about how many instances I can run well at the same time.

I've had a lot of DMs asking for updates, so I want to clarify where I stand and ask for your feedback. $LEAK started as a live POC while I was building LaunchProof. At the time, I could only detect X-verified launches from @zacklabadie . I launched $LEAK to confirm whether the public flow worked for someone else and whether my detection was accurate. It worked. That was its original purpose. I never promised utility or a roadmap. What happened afterwards was much bigger than expected. $LEAK nearly reached a $500K market cap, and I kept shipping because I felt responsible for the people around it. Today, I own no $LEAK. I burned my remaining balance after the community asked me to, including tokens I had bought around an $80K market cap. Creator fees are negligible and cannot fund continued development by themselves. I also have a job and other responsibilities. I am always happy to share real progress, receive feedback and consider useful features. What I do not want to do is create announcements or activity purely to influence the chart. $LEAK did not fall in isolation either. Most tokens built around the narrative followed similar charts. I am still open to building something much more ambitious if there is a real market for it. Better analysis, security tools, data, alerts, execution or even a complete trading product could all be interesting directions. That genuinely excites me. But I want to build something solid with a real chance of working, not rush out a broken product in three days for a short-lived reaction. If LaunchProof eventually generates enough revenue to fund development and let me dedicate myself to it full time, many more things become possible. LEAK integrations, holder benefits or even transparent buybacks could then be discussed. Revenue has to exist first, and I do not want to promise mechanisms that cannot yet be funded. If LaunchProof finds a product people genuinely use and becomes sustainable, I’ll be able to dedicate much more time to it and build it properly. I’d genuinely enjoy shaping that direction with the people using it. So tell me what would actually be useful. What is missing from LaunchProof, and which problem would you want it to solve?