In one day, I went from complete fucking noob to... a Jev power user? (Read this, and you can too!) I've been playing with Jev, a new AI model from @typesafeai. I'm not a developer, so I wanted to find out what I could actually build with it. I made four increasingly crafty/interesting demos: An email sorter 2,000 test emails sorted into buckets in 4.4 seconds, for about 4 cents. It flags uncertain cases for a human to review. A customer-review playground Would this person buy again? What should we improve? How did they feel about the product? Ask all three and get answers your app can use. “Should I send this Message?” Got anger issues? Give it your draft Slack or email... whether you're about to rage quit, or saying something nice. It picks send now, soften first, sleep on it, or say it in person. “Am I bombing?” A pitch-coach experiment. The browser uses Face API to turn camera and voice cues into numbers; Jev uses those to suggest feedback. I simulated nervous and confident pitches to show the feedback changing. Each one uses the same basic idea: give Jev the situation and the possible answers. It picks an answer, tells the app how sure it is, and the app uses that result. You can start with one judgment you're tired of making over and over! Here's my Jev Test™ for new and existing projects: (1) Do I keep asking the same question? (2) Can I name the possible answers? (3) Would deciding faster or more often actually help? If something in your work passes all three, that's a place to start. Full 10-minute walkthrough attached, including when I'd still use Claude or ChatGPT. Watch on YouTube: What decision at work would you build one of these for? (Shoutout to @tenex_labs' finest -- @seejayhess and @_raghavdixit_ -- for the knowledge you imparted for this one!!)

I’m happy to announce that AI is finally coming for my job. This intro you see was made with GPT-6 Astra. I gave Codex my raw footage, my script, and access to Final Cut. I described the visual direction with screenshots of references and natural language, and viola - beautiful results. I still want to bring my own perspectives, come up with fun ideas to explore, and decide what deserves to be on screen. But the exporting, dragging, dropping, and repetitive cleanup? Please take it!! Creators: what part of the process would you happily hand off? Watch the full video here:

My brother-in-law landed a job interview for two reasons: 1. He used AI to optimize his resume keywords for the ATS scanner 2. He dropped a bullet under Skills that read: "bicycle repair, eccentric ideating, frolicking amongst foliage and critters, and patriotism" Guess which one they asked him about. AI has a personality, but it’s just the average of everything it knows, and everybody's has the same one. Your quirks, your references, the weird asides you put in in parentheses — your ✨authenticity✨ — that’s the last remaining “moat” to stand out in anything you produce. That's one of 5 things I learned making this video essay. I spent a day yapping with my team at Tenex (people who are hired FOR their AI skills how they avoid making slop with it) to try and figure out: Why do people drift from using AI for grunt work to completely outsourcing their thinking to it? The point here isn't as simple as "AI Bad" -- it's about how to put your thinking cap back on! Tap in and tell me if there's a pointer I missed.