To harness AI’s “potential to increase prosperity,” governments should work in concert, write @alexolegimas, @elerianm, and James Manyika. “Washington can start by forming a U.S.-led coalition built around trusted partners willing to accept common safety and security standards.”
“AI holds the promise of providing both the productivity boost and the tools to pave the way for discoveries that can address many of the problems weighing down aging, debt-ridden societies across the world,” write @alexolegimas, @elerianm, and James Manyika.
“Harnessing AI’s potential to increase prosperity without destabilizing society requires coordination,” write @alexolegimas, @elerianm, and James Manyika.
“AI adoption risks repeating the mistakes of globalization.” Read @alexolegimas, @elerianm, and James Manyika on how governments can avoid a backlash to artificial intelligence.
“The potential of AI is a combination of the Industrial Revolution, whose general-purpose technologies transformed production, and the Enlightenment, which brought about inventions for making inventions,” write @alexolegimas, @elerianm, and James Manyika.
“The way to ensure that society benefits from AI’s enormous potential while mitigating its risks is to make cooperation the clear choice,” write @alexolegimas, @elerianm, and James Manyika.
“The Iranian regime does not think it can live with a U.S. presence in the Middle East, so it is willing to go full tilt to get the United States out,” writes Mohammad Ayatollahi Tabaar.
Not all African countries will benefit from today’s investment boom—but those that attract sustained foreign capital “could see tremendous growth,” writes @JaredCohen.
As artificial intelligence supercharges the threat of online disinformation, U.S. “politicians have been dismantling the government agencies designed to track foreign influence,” write @noUpside and @JoshAGoldstein.
Instead of treating Moscow’s hybrid attacks as isolated incidents, NATO members should “identify patterns of Russian aggression that will trigger” a collective response, argues Julianne Smith.
“Brazil is becoming the object of other countries’ security policies rather than the author of its own,” writes @MatiasSpektor. What explains Brazil’s waning influence?
In a new episode of “The Foreign Affairs Interview,” @kyleichan and @hlntnr discuss how the United States and China think about and approach AI. Listen here:
“The stifling political atmosphere Xi has created is draining Beijing’s ability to respond to emerging problems as earlier generations once did,” writes @CarlMinzner.
“Throughout much of history, the Red Sea connected societies on both shores, and today, geography is reasserting itself.”
Read @alanboswell on the Horn of Africa’s renewed integration with the greater Middle East:
“All modern wars end in negotiated settlements,” write Stephen Biddle, @SamWinterLevy, and Yuri Zhukov. Success in combat can shape bargains, but it can’t preclude bargaining altogether.
Michael Robbins, Amaney Jamal, and Mark Tessler discuss their recent @ArabBarometer survey, which found that “despite living in horrific circumstances, most Gazans want to remain and rebuild.”
In a world without rising powers, violence will persist—but conflicts will be “unlikely to carry the global scope, ideological zeal, generational duration, and apocalyptic potential of hegemonic contests,” writes Michael Beckley.
Syrians are suffering because their leaders are “short on economic expertise” and have rejected international borrowing, writes @AbuJamajem. How can the country begin to recover?
“Iran cannot evict the world’s only superpower from the Middle East,” writes @AliVaez. “Yet it can keep damaging U.S. regional bases, bombing the United States’ regional allies, and disrupting international commerce.”