Helen MAGA❤️💪🇺🇸
@helengmaga
Here’s Helen_maga99
American Patriot | America First
Exposing deception • Demanding accountability
Conservative voice | No fear. No compromise. MAGA ❤️
722 Following 2.2K Followers
🥵English version:
This is absolutely explosive!
Last night I saw a shocking piece of news that was also reported by the *Vancouver Sun* and other media. Former Canadian federal cabinet minister and current leader of the BC Conservative Party, Kerry-Lynne Findlay (冯杰妮), referred to her fellow party member, Richmond MLA Teresa Wat (屈洁冰), as “CCP” (Chinese Communist Party) in an internal group chat. When questioned by reporters, Findlay did not deny it.
What makes this especially difficult for me is that I know both of these women very well. During the last two federal elections, I stayed in contact and communication with Findlay. She is not only an excellent and experienced lawyer, but also a heavyweight from the Harper government era. She served as Minister of National Revenue, Associate Minister of National Defence, and Whip under both Harper and Pierre Poilievre.
Her husband Brent is also our friend — a very warm-hearted person who often encourages my children to bravely pursue their own life paths.
What left the deepest impression on me was one year on my birthday. I was completely absorbed in film production and had totally forgotten about it. After work, the entire building was empty except for me. My husband came with the kids to pick me up and take me out for a birthday dinner, and only then did I remember it was my birthday.
Suddenly a car pulled up in front of the empty office building, and a couple got out — it was Kerry-Lynne Findlay and her husband. They handed me flowers and said, “Xiaomin, happy birthday!” I was deeply moved beyond words.
In China, it is almost unimaginable that a top national-level political figure would take time out of a busy schedule to suddenly show up in front of an ordinary person, bring beautiful flowers, and wish them a happy birthday.
Yet this former Canadian cabinet minister not only remembered the birthday of an ordinary filmmaker like me, but personally delivered flowers and greetings. That gesture was truly precious.
Later we had several opportunities to sit down over coffee and talk passionately about the development of North American cinema. Those fiery years still leave me with warm memories.
As for Teresa Wat, she once had an office on the same floor as mine. Almost the entire floor belonged to my company, and her suite was in the farthest corner.
We have known each other for many years, shared meals, and attended events together. I myself dislike socializing and have no interest in getting involved in politics, so I usually decline most banquets whenever possible. But whenever something is genuinely beneficial to Canada and the Chinese community, I will step up without hesitation.
For example, at the hearing led by Teresa Wat to set the historical record straight for the Chinese railway workers who built the Pacific Railway, I was invited to speak on stage. After I stepped down, the organizers shook my hand excitedly and said, “A real star is a real star — you spoke so well and moved so many people.”
That is why seeing yesterday’s report — that Findlay had internally labeled Teresa Wat as “CCP” (please look carefully at the content in the attached screenshots) — shook me deeply.
My past trust in Teresa Wat came from the fact that she is an old Hong Konger. I believed she would not just follow the crowd on issues of freedom, equality, and public affairs, and would maintain the independent judgment typical of older Hong Kongers.
This incident caused a huge earthquake within the party and even led to the resignation of Executive Director Angelo Isidorou and others. Afterwards, Findlay posted publicly on Facebook affirming Teresa Wat’s work and contributions, trying to pull the crisis back into internal party negotiation.
Findlay is by no means a careless speaker. As both a lawyer and a top-tier politician, she is fully aware of the legal and political boundaries and understands the weight and consequences of every word she says.
This inevitably brings to mind the media reports that “foreign interference in Canadian elections and politics has long existed and continues to this day.” This is not fiction — it is something that has been happening in reality.
Seeing two acquaintances caught up in this massive storm fills me with mixed emotions.
Currently both sides have chosen to resolve the matter through internal party mechanisms, which may be a rational choice. But after this upheaval, the deeper questions it raises about political trust, national security, and especially political integrity are still worth calm reflection by everyone who cares about Canada’s future.
Show more
太炸裂啦！昨晚看到一则令人震惊的新闻，《温哥华太阳报》及其他媒体也相继报道，前加拿大联邦内阁部长、现 BC 省保守党党魁冯杰妮（Kerry-Lynne Findlay），在内部群组中指称同党派的 Richmond 省议员屈洁冰女士为“CCP”（共产党）。面对记者质询，冯杰妮并未否认。
让我纠结的是，这两位女士我都非常熟悉。在这届和上一届联邦大选期间，我和冯杰妮一直保持着联系与沟通。她不仅是位优秀资深的律师，更是哈珀政府时期的重磅人物，曾任国家税务部长、国防部副部长及哈珀时期，博励治时期（Pierre Poilievre）党鞭。
她的先生 Brent 也是我们的朋友，非常热心，经常鼓励我的孩子们勇敢地寻找自己的人生方向。
最令我难忘的是有一年我生日，因为忙于电影制作，每天昏天黑地完全忘了。下班后整栋大楼只剩下我一人，先生带孩子来接我说出去吃饭为我庆生🎉，我这才想起来那天是我的生日。
此时，已经空旷的办公大楼前突然来了一辆车，走下一对男女，正是冯杰妮女士和她先生。他们递过鲜花并对我说：“晓敏，祝你生日快乐！”当时我感动得无以复加。
在国内，你很难想象会有一位举国上下顶尖的政治人物能在百忙中突然出现在一个普通人面前，给你送上绚丽的鲜花并祝福你生日快乐。🎁🎊🎈🎉🎂
而加拿大这位前内阁部长，不仅记得我这位普通电影人的生日，还亲自送来了鲜花和问候，这份心意真是弥足珍贵。
后来我们曾有多次机会坐在一起喝咖啡，畅谈北美电影的发展，那段激情燃烧的岁月，至今给我留下了温暖的回忆。
而屈洁冰女士，当年曾与我在同一层楼办公，整层楼几乎都是我的公司，最把角的一个套间是屈洁冰女士的办公室。
我们认识很多年，一起吃过饭，参加过活动。我本人不爱社交，也不想参与政治，所以能谢绝的宴会大多谢绝了。但只要是对加拿大和华人社区真正有益的事，我都会义不容辞地加入。
比如在为屈洁冰女士主导的、为修建太平洋铁路华工「历史正名」的听证会上，我被邀请上台发表演讲，走下讲台时，主办方握着我的手激动地说：“大明星就是大明星，讲得太好了，感动了无数人。”
正因如此，看到昨天这则报道，冯杰妮内部通报屈洁冰是 CCP（大家注意看配图上的内容），这令我感到极大的震动。
我过去对屈洁冰女士的信任，源于她是老香港人，我相信她对自由平等和公众事务上不会随波逐流，会保持老香港人的独立见解。
此事在党内引发巨大震荡，甚至导致执行董事安吉洛·伊西多鲁（Angelo Isidorou）等人离职。随后冯杰妮在 Facebook 公开发文，肯定了屈洁冰的工作与奉献，试图将危机拉回党内协商解决。
而冯杰妮也绝不是一个口无遮拦的人。她身兼律师与顶尖政客的双重身份，深谙法律与政治的边界，非常清楚自己每一句话的份量和后果。
这不禁让人想起媒体报道中提及的那句话：“外国势力对加拿大选举与政治渗透早已存在且持续已久”。这并非虚构，而是现实中一直在发生的事。
这两位熟人卷入这场巨大的风波，让我感慨万千。
目前双方选择在党内机制下解决问题，这或许是理性的选择。但在这场震荡之后，留给人们关于政治信任、国家安全与特別是政治操守等深层思考，依然值得每一个关心加拿大未来的人去冷静地审视。
Show more
🔥We must find these 400 illegal immigrants who have already voted, send them to prison, and deport them.
👺From 2020 until now, Fauci has personally destroyed the word “expert” with his own mouth.
This video puts his own statements side by side:
Early on he publicly said ordinary people don’t need to wear masks. Later it became “not wearing a mask is irresponsible.”
At first he swore the vaccines would stop infection and transmission. When the data didn’t match, he walked it back to “mainly preventing severe disease.”
Private emails show he was already aware of the possibility of a Wuhan lab leak. In public he aggressively shut down the lab-leak theory and insisted “we did not fund gain-of-function research.”
Under oath in Congress he repeatedly said “I don’t recall” and “according to the science at the time.” Now he has invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times and said nothing.
Truth doesn’t fear questions. A real scientist doesn’t need “I don’t recall” and total silence to protect himself.
For more than six years, Fauci was deeply involved in, actively promoted, and repeatedly lent his authority to policies on masks, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and the suppression of the lab-leak theory — policies that caused enormous harm.
Now that it’s his turn to answer, he chooses silence.
This is not science evolving. This is systematic deception.
Every single line in the video is his own words. Watch for yourself.
Follow me for new discoveries every day @helengmaga @helen_maga99👺
Show more
🔥China released the Regulations of the State Council on Exit-Entry Administration on July 31. It takes effect on September 15.
The regulation mainly does four things:
• Border officers can actively discourage Chinese citizens from going to high-risk countries;
• Applications to leave the country must be “true and legal” — fake materials can get you denied;
• Chinese citizens can be banned from leaving for 6 months to 3 years for certain violations; foreigners can be banned from entering for 1 to 5 years;
• All exit-entry intermediaries must register with the government. Non-compliance means fines or shutdown.
It looks like stronger management and safety protection. But the real core is simple:
The state is tightening its final say over whether you can leave the country.
This is typical of a communist system.
In this system, the individual is not a free person with natural rights. You are part of the state machine. The freedom to move, to choose where to live, is not something you naturally own — it is something the state grants or takes back according to its needs.
The Soviet Union’s exit controls, East Germany’s Berlin Wall, China’s strict passport controls in the past, and these more detailed rules today all follow the same logic.
Here is the real harm:
Once the state can freely decide whether you may leave, then your personal freedom, property safety, and even the right to speak truth ultimately rest in the hands of power.
On the surface it is “for your own good.” In reality it is “I control you.”
Historically, this exact mindset — treating people as tools and freedom as a privilege the state can revoke — produced the Great Famine, the Cultural Revolution, mass persecution, and decades of poverty.
This regulation itself is not extreme. But it clearly reveals the root problem: under a communist system, power naturally expands upward, and individual rights are naturally compressed downward.
A system that truly respects people does not treat the right to leave as something the state can take away whenever it wants.
Show more
🤬The CCP flew DSA members to China as VIPs and had them publicly pledge to “support the People’s Republic of China and defend Chinese socialism.” This is pure betrayal.
Fox News reports: Multiple members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) were flown to China by the CCP, treated like royalty. Provincial foreign affairs officials called them “VIPs” and gave them full high-level receptions.
New York City DSA member Dee Knight even bragged in his blog: “Beijing buzzed with excitement… they treated us like VIPs.”
Even worse — about a dozen DSA members (including International Committee members) signed a pledge from “Friends of Socialist China,” openly declaring:
Support for the People’s Republic of China
Resolve to support, defend, and promote “Chinese socialism”
“The continued survival of Chinese socialism is a crucial matter not only for the Chinese people but for all humanity”
These same DSA members form the political base of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. They push socialism in America while flying to Beijing to swear loyalty to the CCP — all under the banner of “anti-imperialism.”
This is not cultural exchange. This is united front infiltration. The CCP is cultivating the American left as a fifth column — free flights, VIP treatment, in exchange for public endorsement of the Chinese communist system.
Real Americans need to wake up: these people’s loyalty to the U.S. Constitution is far weaker than their loyalty to the CCP.
Socialism is not democracy. The CCP is not a friend. This open defection must be fully exposed.
Follow me find more
@helengmaga @helen_maga99
Show more
🤬The CCP flew DSA members to China as VIPs and had them publicly pledge to “support the People’s Republic of China and defend Chinese socialism.” This is pure betrayal.
Fox News reports: Multiple members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) were flown to China by the CCP, treated like royalty. Provincial foreign affairs officials called them “VIPs” and gave them full high-level receptions.
New York City DSA member Dee Knight even bragged in his blog: “Beijing buzzed with excitement… they treated us like VIPs.”
Even worse — about a dozen DSA members (including International Committee members) signed a pledge from “Friends of Socialist China,” openly declaring:
Support for the People’s Republic of China
Resolve to support, defend, and promote “Chinese socialism”
“The continued survival of Chinese socialism is a crucial matter not only for the Chinese people but for all humanity”
These same DSA members form the political base of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. They push socialism in America while flying to Beijing to swear loyalty to the CCP — all under the banner of “anti-imperialism.”
This is not cultural exchange. This is united front infiltration. The CCP is cultivating the American left as a fifth column — free flights, VIP treatment, in exchange for public endorsement of the Chinese communist system.
Real Americans need to wake up: these people’s loyalty to the U.S. Constitution is far weaker than their loyalty to the CCP.
Socialism is not democracy. The CCP is not a friend. This open defection must be fully exposed.
Follow me find more
@helengmaga @helen_maga99
Show more
‼️How Elite U.S. Journalists Took All-Expenses-Paid Trips to China — and Came Back Changed
On July 28, 2026, White House correspondent Natalie Winters dropped a bombshell investigation that ripped the polite mask off a carefully engineered influence operation.
A leaked internal document from the **Committee of 100 (C100)** — an organization Xi Jinping himself once praised as a “friendly organization” making “untiring efforts” to advance Chinese influence in the United States — revealed that at least 26 top American journalists, editors, and broadcasters had been flown to China on curated, high-end trips. The goal was not cultural exchange. It was to reshape how they saw Beijing… and how they covered it.
### The Operation
C100’s “Leadership Delegation Program” targeted the people who decide what America reads and hears about China. Delegates came from *The New York Times*, *The Washington Post*, *Politico*, *NPR*, *PBS*, *The Atlantic*, *The New Yorker*, *Financial Times*, *TIME*, *USA Today*, and more.
These were not backpacker trips. One 2012 delegation alone — Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou — cost roughly $60,000. Participants stayed in classic hotels, sampled regional Chinese cuisine, toured the Great Wall and Forbidden City, attended dinners in the Great Hall of the People, and sat down with carefully selected officials, state media executives, business leaders, and academics.
C100 tracked its success with clinical precision. It publicly claimed that 70% of American “opinion leaders” who visited China returned with improved views of the country. Internally, the real metric was simpler: Did we change how they think?
### The Smoking-Gun Report
The most damning piece is a 2012 after-action report marked **“Internal Use.”** It records what the journalists said after the trip:
- Financial Times editor Gary Silverman: “I don’t think that I will ever think or write about China in the future without reflecting on what I learned this week.”
- WNYC host Brian Lehrer: His perception of China changed “in 100 ways.”
- Foreign Affairs managing editor Jonathan Tepperman returned with a “much deeper, more subtle and more nuanced sense” of China and called it the best press trip he had ever taken.
- New York Times deputy business editor Winnie O’Kelley came back with “several story ideas” and plans to “shape my staff across Asia in some different ways.” She even hoped to add at least one business reporter in China.
A Chinese academic congratulated the organizers: “It is hard to speak on China without being to the country. You made the change!”
C100’s own verdict was blunt:
“The C-100 Leadership Delegation Program has had a visible impact on their understanding and perceptions of China.”
They hoped the delegates would share those new perceptions with colleagues and reshape coverage back home.
### The Names
Here are some of the participants (titles at the time of their trips):
- Jill Abramson — Managing Editor, *The New York Times*
- David Brooks — Columnist, *The New York Times*
- David Ignatius — Associate Editor & columnist, *Washington Post*
- Eugene Robinson — Columnist & Associate Editor, *Washington Post*
- Ruth Marcus — Columnist, *Washington Post*
- Fred Hiatt — Editorial Page Editor, *Washington Post*
- John Harris — Editor-in-Chief, *Politico*
- Juan Williams — Senior Political Analyst, *NPR*
- Brian Lehrer — Host, WNYC
- Clive Crook — Senior Editor, *The Atlantic*
- Jonathan Tepperman — Managing Editor, *Foreign Affairs*
- Gary Silverman — U.S. News Editor, *Financial Times*
- And many more from *Newsweek*, *TIME*, *Los Angeles Times*, *USA Today*, *HuffPost*, and *The New Yorker*.
### What Happened After They Came Home
Winters tracked the subsequent work of several delegates. Some of the same voices later became prominent critics of tougher policies toward Beijing:
- David Brooks called Trump’s proposed tariffs “the single worst policy idea on the table.”
- Eugene Robinson described the trade war as an “ill-advised gambit” and suggested Xi Jinping could emerge as the “reasonable adult.”
- David Ignatius warned America was “dramatically overestimating China’s capabilities” and called growing alarm “scare talk.”
One Financial Times columnist later defended allowing the Chinese-founded fast-fashion giant Shein to list in London despite serious supply-chain and labor concerns.
### The Bigger Picture
This was not random tourism. C100 has repeatedly been linked to figures and institutions inside the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front system — the same influence network U.S. officials describe as designed to “co-opt and neutralize sources of opposition.” The organization selected journalists based on their ability to deliver favorable coverage and then measured success by whether those journalists’ thinking actually shifted.
The documents, itineraries, and internal assessments were scattered across archives for years. Natalie Winters pulled them together, named the names, and published the evidence.
Full investigation and original documents:
Show more
‼️How Elite U.S. Journalists Took All-Expenses-Paid Trips to China — and Came Back Changed
On July 28, 2026, White House correspondent Natalie Winters dropped a bombshell investigation that ripped the polite mask off a carefully engineered influence operation.
A leaked internal document from the **Committee of 100 (C100)** — an organization Xi Jinping himself once praised as a “friendly organization” making “untiring efforts” to advance Chinese influence in the United States — revealed that at least 26 top American journalists, editors, and broadcasters had been flown to China on curated, high-end trips. The goal was not cultural exchange. It was to reshape how they saw Beijing… and how they covered it.
### The Operation
C100’s “Leadership Delegation Program” targeted the people who decide what America reads and hears about China. Delegates came from *The New York Times*, *The Washington Post*, *Politico*, *NPR*, *PBS*, *The Atlantic*, *The New Yorker*, *Financial Times*, *TIME*, *USA Today*, and more.
These were not backpacker trips. One 2012 delegation alone — Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou — cost roughly $60,000. Participants stayed in classic hotels, sampled regional Chinese cuisine, toured the Great Wall and Forbidden City, attended dinners in the Great Hall of the People, and sat down with carefully selected officials, state media executives, business leaders, and academics.
C100 tracked its success with clinical precision. It publicly claimed that 70% of American “opinion leaders” who visited China returned with improved views of the country. Internally, the real metric was simpler: Did we change how they think?
### The Smoking-Gun Report
The most damning piece is a 2012 after-action report marked **“Internal Use.”** It records what the journalists said after the trip:
- Financial Times editor Gary Silverman: “I don’t think that I will ever think or write about China in the future without reflecting on what I learned this week.”
- WNYC host Brian Lehrer: His perception of China changed “in 100 ways.”
- Foreign Affairs managing editor Jonathan Tepperman returned with a “much deeper, more subtle and more nuanced sense” of China and called it the best press trip he had ever taken.
- New York Times deputy business editor Winnie O’Kelley came back with “several story ideas” and plans to “shape my staff across Asia in some different ways.” She even hoped to add at least one business reporter in China.
A Chinese academic congratulated the organizers: “It is hard to speak on China without being to the country. You made the change!”
C100’s own verdict was blunt:
“The C-100 Leadership Delegation Program has had a visible impact on their understanding and perceptions of China.”
They hoped the delegates would share those new perceptions with colleagues and reshape coverage back home.
### The Names
Here are some of the participants (titles at the time of their trips):
- Jill Abramson — Managing Editor, *The New York Times*
- David Brooks — Columnist, *The New York Times*
- David Ignatius — Associate Editor & columnist, *Washington Post*
- Eugene Robinson — Columnist & Associate Editor, *Washington Post*
- Ruth Marcus — Columnist, *Washington Post*
- Fred Hiatt — Editorial Page Editor, *Washington Post*
- John Harris — Editor-in-Chief, *Politico*
- Juan Williams — Senior Political Analyst, *NPR*
- Brian Lehrer — Host, WNYC
- Clive Crook — Senior Editor, *The Atlantic*
- Jonathan Tepperman — Managing Editor, *Foreign Affairs*
- Gary Silverman — U.S. News Editor, *Financial Times*
- And many more from *Newsweek*, *TIME*, *Los Angeles Times*, *USA Today*, *HuffPost*, and *The New Yorker*.
### What Happened After They Came Home
Winters tracked the subsequent work of several delegates. Some of the same voices later became prominent critics of tougher policies toward Beijing:
- David Brooks called Trump’s proposed tariffs “the single worst policy idea on the table.”
- Eugene Robinson described the trade war as an “ill-advised gambit” and suggested Xi Jinping could emerge as the “reasonable adult.”
- David Ignatius warned America was “dramatically overestimating China’s capabilities” and called growing alarm “scare talk.”
One Financial Times columnist later defended allowing the Chinese-founded fast-fashion giant Shein to list in London despite serious supply-chain and labor concerns.
### The Bigger Picture
This was not random tourism. C100 has repeatedly been linked to figures and institutions inside the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front system — the same influence network U.S. officials describe as designed to “co-opt and neutralize sources of opposition.” The organization selected journalists based on their ability to deliver favorable coverage and then measured success by whether those journalists’ thinking actually shifted.
The documents, itineraries, and internal assessments were scattered across archives for years. Natalie Winters pulled them together, named the names, and published the evidence.
Full investigation and original documents:
Show more
😊Seeing President Trump take repeated shots at *The New York Times* these past few days fills me with real joy. It feels like the effort I’ve put in over these past months is finally getting an echo.
There is no hatred without a reason. Why does *The New York Times* hate America so much, hate America’s democratically elected president so much, that it is willing to leak tactical details to the enemy—even if it gets American soldiers killed? How did a paper with a hundred-year history that once stood above the rest turn into today’s sell-out rag?
I want to start with Li Yuan @LiYuan6, who has a clear Xinhua background. She was sent by Xinhua to study in the United States early on, worked at *The Wall Street Journal* for more than a decade, and finally entrenched herself at *The New York Times*. After more than twenty years living in America, she remains a thorough Chinese national—portraying Trump as Mao Zedong, pasting Trump’s face onto the head of that greatest mass murderer Mao, and labeling every patriot as Red Guards who burn, kill, and loot. Who made her do this? The answer is already obvious. Any normal person can see it: she is one of the Trojan horses the CCP has planted in America with hundreds of millions of dollars in investment.
Perhaps President Trump has long seen through it all. I am deeply relieved. Even though I cannot influence America’s core media, as long as someone can take down a sell-out paper like *The New York Times*, that alone would be a victory.
Follow me find more👇
@helengmaga @helen_maga99
Show more
The CCP has embedded countless Trojan horses within the United States, using political, media, academic, and economic channels.
Yuan Li is a CCP planted asset embedded in America’s mainstream media for over a decade.
Please sign to support my investigation into her. Anyone can sign — this is not an election.
This is simply to push the IRS and DOJ to stop delaying.
Thank you. via
Show more
DHS just posted:
.@USCIS is eliminating delays in the asylum process so we can more efficiently hear illegal aliens’ claims and fulfill @POTUS Trump’s immigration agenda.
What they’re doing: For certain affirmative asylum applications, USCIS can now refer cases directly to immigration judges — skipping the usual asylum interview. The rule takes effect immediately. The goal is to slash the massive backlog and stop people from using the asylum system as a delay tactic + free work permit.
USCIS Director put it clearly: The asylum system exists to protect people with genuine fear of persecution — not to be exploited for delay and work authorization. Resources must go to real claims first.
This is exactly what the Trump administration is delivering — stop the abuse, speed up the process, remove the bad actors faster, and properly adjudicate the legitimate ones.
Support this. Keep clearing the backlog and closing the loopholes.
Follow me for more 🇺🇸
@helengmaga @helen_maga99
Show more
🔥😰👉Chengdu’s “People’s Big Canteens” Are Back — And History’s Shadow Is Rising Again
A recent video circulating online shows the emergence of “People’s Big Canteens” (全民大食堂) in Chengdu. The promotional message claims that within a three-kilometer radius, no one cooks at home anymore, and the model is now being copied across the country. The footage features large woks of food being stir-fried, people lining up with trays, and diners sitting at long communal tables. The captions emphasize that it is “cheaper than cooking yourself and safer than eating out,” with “hygienic ingredients, no frozen food, and no pre-made dishes.”
On the surface, it looks like a convenient community service — affordable, convenient, and clean. But many Chinese people watching it feel an immediate chill: Isn’t this exactly the same as the “big canteens” of the past?
History: How the Great Leap Forward’s Communal Dining Halls Starved Millions
In 1958, Mao Zedong launched the Great Leap Forward. Rural China was rapidly organized into people’s communes, and public canteens (公共食堂) were forcibly imposed.
The system worked like this:
•Families were required to hand over their pots, pans, grain, and livestock to the collective.
•Private cooking was banned or heavily restricted.
•Everyone had to eat at the canteen. At first, the slogan was “eat as much as you want.”
•Massive waste followed — leftover food was simply thrown away.
•Local cadres inflated production figures layer by layer, while real grain was heavily requisitioned by the state.
The result: food supplies were quickly exhausted through consumption and waste. Between 1959 and 1961, China suffered the most severe man-made famine in human history — the Great Chinese Famine. Conservative estimates put the death toll at 15 to 30 million; some scholars estimate over 45 million. In provinces such as Sichuan, Henan, and Anhui, corpses littered the land and cannibalism occurred.
The public canteens were one of the central drivers of the disaster. They completely stripped farmers of control over their own food, giving grassroots cadres the power of life and death over who ate and how much. By the time the canteens collapsed and were forced to close, it was already too late.
Today: Why Are “Big Canteens” Returning?
The community canteens being promoted in places like Chengdu are nominally “voluntary” and framed as convenience services. Yet the propaganda language is strikingly similar: no need to cook yourself, more economical, more reliable, no one nearby cooks anymore, and the whole country should follow the example.
Many comments online immediately connect it to history:
•“Last time they ate up all the grain this way.”
•“Sitting and eating until the mountain collapses.”
•“They never learned the lesson.”
•“Once everyone can only eat at designated canteens, when the porridge has no vegetables or meat, who will dare speak up?”
With the economy slowing, youth unemployment high, and local governments under fiscal pressure, low-price canteens are a common tool to attract people, control consumption, and reduce household spending. Once dependence forms, the function of private kitchens weakens, and individual control over food is further eroded.
History has already written the lesson clearly: when a regime begins large-scale promotion of “everyone come eat at the canteen,” the real danger is not the canteen itself, but the underlying deprivation of personal autonomy and control over food.
Last time, tens of millions starved. They did not reflect. Now they are trying it again. The ending was written long ago.
Show more
大食堂，坐食山崩，上次就是这样把糧食吃光了，饿死了很多人。但他们并没有吸取教训，现在又要捲土重來，结局早已定好了，这次要饿死更多的人。
Show more
🚨Yesterday ’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner: The entire fake media dressed to the nines, laughing their heads off at Trump’s stand-up comedy. They clustered around him and refused to leave, as if they were listening to a cute neighborhood uncle telling stories.
Trump even directly joked about the constitutional term limits for the presidency on stage and said: “I won three times, now I’m going to do it again.”
After saying that, under the gaze of all the mainstream media reporters in the room, he pulled out a red hat printed with “Trump 2028,” put it on his head, and joked: “I’m only doing this to save your news media’s ratings!”
The old man Trump maxed out the theatrical effect, making these fake media so embarrassed. Truly enough to make people die of anger! Haha 😂
The “pig” 🐽 stream media is best at “double-standard narratives.” One second they’re still running headlines painting Trump as the “ender of democracy” and an “extremely dangerous dictator,” the next second the whole crowd is dressed up, sitting in the audience, laughing their heads off and applauding his comedy bits.
This kind of “all ideology on the lips, all traffic in the heart” is truly ironic! 🥶😰
I’ve put together a list of tonight’s jokes for everyone. Have a happy weekend 😆😝🙌
📝 Trump’s speech highlight list:
1. Joke about RFK Jr.: “Everyone enjoyed the delicious steak tonight, and this cow was personally run over and killed by RFK Jr.”
2. Mocking Newsom on wildfires: “The only thing we can be sure about with Gavin Newsom is that he absolutely does not want to use water to put out fires.”
3. Mocking Adam Schiff’s appearance: “Look at Adam Schiff — that big head on a skinny neck.”
4. Roasting rock stars and anchors: Took a jab at Springsteen for “looking terrible,” and joked that CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins “doesn’t smile enough.”
5. Putting on the “Trump 2028” hat and declaring: “To save your ratings, I announce my fourth campaign!”
6. Body armor joke: “Wearing body armor makes you look like you’ve gained 20 pounds. A lot of people would rather get shot than wear it. They put one on me and I said: I’m not wearing this thing!”
7. Labeling the media:
Trump pointed at the “pig” 🐽 stream media in the room and said: “This room is filled with the largest group of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) patients in history.”
Hahaha 😂 That last line was absolutely brilliant.
🙌😝👍
Show more
🚨今天的白宫记者晚宴：假媒体全员花枝招展，听川普单口相声笑到合不拢嘴😂围着川普不肯离开，就好像在听可爱的邻居大叔讲故事。
川普还在台上直接调侃了宪法对总统任期的限制，并且说：“我已经赢了三次，现在我要再来一次！”（I won three times, now I'm going to do it again.）
说完这句话后，他还在全场主流媒体记者的注视下，掏出一顶印有“Trump 2028”的红色帽子戴在头上，并笑称：“我这么做纯粹是为了拯救你们新闻媒体的收视率！”
川老头儿把戏剧效果直接拉满，弄得这些假媒体好尴尬，真是气死人不偿命！哈哈😂
“猪”🐽流媒体最擅长“双标叙事”。前一秒还在头条里把川普描绘成“民主终结者”、“极其危险的独裁者”，后一秒又全员盛装出席，坐在台下为他的脱口秀段子哄堂大笑、鼓掌叫好。
这种“嘴上全是主义，心里全是流量”的那点龌龊，真是讽刺！🥶😰
给大家整理了一个今晚的笑话清单，周末开心快乐😆😝🙌
📝 川普讲话爆笑清单：
1，关于小肯尼迪的笑话：“大家今晚享受到了美味的牛排，而这头牛是小肯尼迪（RFK Jr.）亲自开车撞死的。”
2，讽刺纽森山火：“我们对加文·纽森唯一能确定的事——就是他绝对不想用水去灭火。”
3，吐槽亚当·希夫外貌：“看看亚当·希夫，那个细脖子上长了个大脑袋。”
4，吐槽摇滚巨星与主播：顺带吐槽斯普林斯汀“看起来糟透了”，调侃 CNN 主播凯特兰·柯林斯“笑得太少”。
5，戴“Trump 2028”的帽子喊话：“为了救你们的收视率，我宣布第四次竞选！”
6，防弹衣身材梗：“穿防弹衣看起来像胖了20磅，很多人宁愿被打死也不想穿。他们给我套上一件，我说：我才不穿这玩意儿！”
7，给媒体贴标签：
川普指着台下的“猪”🐽流媒体说：“这间屋子里聚集了“史上最大群体的川普综合征（TDS）患者”。
哈哈哈😂最后这句话太精彩。
🙌😝👍
Show more
🔥😰Data is out
• Every year, 260,000 babies are granted U.S. citizenship through birthright citizenship, even though their parents have no legal status
• Every year, 26,000 babies are granted birthright U.S. citizenship due to birth tourism companies
This means that every 5 years, 1,430,000 babies are granted U.S. citizenship, even though their parents are not U.S. citizens
This is how you lose your country — America
“Every year, 260,000 babies are automatically granted U.S. citizenship whose parents are neither citizens nor lawful permanent residents. As for birth tourism citizenship, that is 20,000 to 26,000 per year.”
We must close this insane birthright citizenship loophole. The Supreme Court’s ruling on this is completely wrong!
Show more
数据出来了
- 每年有 260,000 名婴儿因出生地公民权被赋予美国公民身份，其父母没有合法身份
- 每年有 26,000 名婴儿因出生旅游公司而被赋予出生地美国公民权
这意味着每 5 年就有 1,430,000 名婴儿被赋予美国公民身份，即使他们的父母不是美国公民
这就是你如何失去你的国家-美国
“每年有 260,000 名婴儿被自动赋予美国公民身份，他们的父母不是公民或合法永久居民。至于出生旅游公民，那是每年 20,000 到 26,000 名”
我们必须关闭这个疯狂的出生地公民权漏洞。最高法院在这件事上的裁决完全错了！
Show more
She （@weijia )is a liar; there are numerous indications that both she and her father—as well as her husband—have ties to the CCP, and she herself has even received rewards from the CCP.
👇👇👇more details
Show more
🔥👉Laura Loomer Publicly Admits Mistake: Fell for Russian Propaganda, Now Conducts Serious Interview with Zelenskyy
Prominent MAGA influencer and strong Trump ally Laura Loomer recently traveled to Kyiv, Ukraine, and sat down with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for an approximately 45-minute exclusive interview. The interview drew widespread attention, largely because of her public admission that she had previously “fallen for Russian propaganda.”
For years, Loomer had been a sharp critic of Ukraine. She repeatedly echoed Russian “denazification” narratives, described Ukraine as “full of Nazi sympathizers,” called Zelenskyy an “actual Nazi” or “self-hating Nazi Jew,” opposed U.S. aid to Ukraine as inconsistent with “America First,” and at times minimized the suffering of the Ukrainian people while amplifying claims about neo-Nazi influence in the Ukrainian military, particularly the Azov Battalion.
After traveling to Ukraine and seeing the situation firsthand, Loomer’s position shifted significantly. During the interview, she told Zelenskyy: “I was bamboozled by Russian propaganda and I came to believe a lot of untrue things about Ukraine.” She publicly apologized for previously downplaying Ukrainian struggles, stating that it had been wrong to say she “didn’t care” and acknowledging that many had been heavily influenced by Russian narratives without realizing it.
Loomer noted that upon arriving in Ukraine she learned Nazism is illegal there, and that the country’s anti-Semitism laws are stricter than those in the United States. She met with local rabbis, some of whom had fled Russia due to state pressure, and visited sites damaged by Russian drone strikes. These experiences led her to conclude that several of her earlier views had been based on false information.
In the interview, Loomer did not avoid tough questions. She pressed Zelenskyy on how sending American taxpayer dollars to Ukraine could be considered “America First,” asking the question more than once. The overall tone of the conversation was candid. Trump later shared and praised the interview on Truth Social.
Loomer’s public admission has sparked debate within conservative circles. Supporters have praised her for having the courage to own her mistakes and seek the truth on the ground. Critics have questioned the timing and sincerity of the shift. Australian journalist Avi Yemini posted that he too had fallen for Russian propaganda and praised Loomer as one of the rare people willing to admit error and grow from it in public.
Loomer’s trip to Ukraine and her interview with Zelenskyy have become a notable moment in the ongoing debate within the American right over the Russia-Ukraine war. Her willingness to acknowledge past mistakes and examine the situation firsthand has been cited by many as an example of intellectual honesty.
Show more
WATCH:
Laura Loomer Interviews Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy @ZelenskyyUa at Mariinsky Palace in Kyiv, Ukraine. 🇺🇦 🇺🇸
Enjoy!
@APUkraine @POTUS @WhiteHouse @KremlinRussia_E
Show more
‼️Montana Senator Tim Sheehy just delivered a speech every American needs to hear in full.
He laid out, without filter, what the Iranian regime has done to Americans for 47 years:
The 1983 Beirut barracks bombing that vaporized 241 Marines. EFPs that cut our troops in half. Americans skinned alive on camera. Power drills through skulls. From Hezbollah to Hamas to the Houthis — all death cults funded and directed by Tehran.
They don’t care who you voted for.
They don’t care what you believe.
They don’t care where you live.
They want every single one of us raped, burned, and cut into pieces.
This is not politics.
This is a death cult that has been at war with America since 1979.
America waited 47 years.
Finally, one president had the courage to actually hit Iran — President Trump.
He put his own life on the line. He put his entire family’s future on the line. All to end a slaughter that previous presidents allowed to continue for decades.
And even then, Democrats and Republican RINOs have already launched more than a dozen votes trying to stop him from striking Iran.
They would rather let a regime that chants “Death to America,” that murders Americans, and that lists the President of the United States as its number-one assassination target keep operating freely than let America finish the fight.
Sheehy said it plainly:
We did not start this war. But we will finish it.
Trump is the first president in 47 years who actually struck back.
Now some in Congress are still trying to tie the military’s hands.
Watch the full speech. Every single second.
Follow me for more daily discoveries
@helengmaga @helen_maga99
Show more
🔥👉🤡Biden Administration: America’s Traitors
Senator Eric Schmitt from Missouri just released a bombshell internal Presidential memorandum from the Biden White House, exposing the most shameless act of the Biden regime in its final days.
The document reveals that Biden’s team advised him to block President Trump’s deportation of 3.1 million illegal immigrants — including members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang — by massively expanding “Temporary” Protected Status (TPS) right before leaving office.
The memo explicitly called for rushing TPS redesignations and new designations before January 20th, specifically to shield these people from Trump’s planned mass deportations.
They even crunched the numbers: Venezuela alone would have protected another 455,000; Nicaragua, Ecuador, Guatemala added up to over 2 million more.
This was naked political sabotage: refusing to accept defeat and instead using executive power to booby-trap the next administration and turn illegal immigration into a permanent feature.
They turned “temporary” protection into de facto amnesty, turned America’s border into a global refugee camp, and treated American citizens’ safety as a bargaining chip.
Worse, they knew this would allow gang members to roam free in the U.S., but did it anyway to pander to leftist voters and special interests.
This wasn’t “humanitarianism.” This was treason against the American people.
President Trump is now cleaning up this mess, and this Biden memo is ironclad proof:
They weren’t governing the country — they were deliberately sabotaging the next one.
Americans will never forget how these people sacrificed national security and border control for their own political games.
Traitors. Plain and simple.
Follow me then find more👇
@helengmaga @helen_maga99
Show more
🚨 Texas banned child transitions. So this doctor fled to Oregon and got hired as Associate Professor of Pediatrics at OHSU.
Dr. May Lau was sued by AG Ken Paxton for giving testosterone to at least 21 minors and allegedly falsifying records. She surrendered her Texas license and moved to a blue state haven.
OHSU has long been a major center for “gender-affirming care.”
Red states protect kids. Blue states protect the activists.
Children are not experiments. We need a national ban on this medical scandal.
Follow me for daily discoveries
@helengmaga @helen_maga99
Show more
🔥👉Great News! Second Circuit Delivers Strong Win for Rule of Law in Immigration
On July 21, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a key ruling, making it clear that habeas corpus cannot be used as an end-run around Congress’s immigration removal-review scheme.
In this case, the court supported the government’s position and rejected attempts to bypass proper deportation procedures through habeas petitions.
Key Impact:
This reinforces the authority of federal immigration law, prevents abuse of the court system to delay or block removals, and strengthens enforcement efforts.
A major victory for the Trump administration, border security, and the rule of law! More wins ahead for America First priorities. 🇺🇸
Show more
🔥👉Great News! Fifth Circuit Delivers Major Win for Immigration Enforcement
On July 21, 2026, the full Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a strong precedential order in Case No. 26-50183 (and consolidated cases), backing the Trump administration’s position.
Key Ruling:
• The court granted the government’s request to stay the Western District of Texas district court judgments.
• It also expedited review for en banc rehearing.
Bottom Line: Illegal aliens do not have a constitutional right to roam free in the United States while their removal proceedings are pending. The government can continue detaining them during the process.
This is a significant victory for border security, rule of law, and America First priorities — stopping catch-and-release policies and protecting American communities. More wins ahead! 🇺🇸
Show more
