People spend so much time working out what the next disaster might be that their books end up badly positioned if anything gets better.
As a wise @conksresearch would say - buckle up
KEVIN “TOO SOON” WARSH! I ASKED FOR LOWER RATES. HE RAISED THEM. EVEN “TOO LATE” POWELL KNEW WHICH DIRECTION TO GO! WE SHOULD BE AT 1%, OR BETTER!
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.
KEVIN “TOO SOON” WARSH! I ASKED FOR LOWER RATES. HE RAISED THEM. EVEN “TOO LATE” POWELL KNEW WHICH DIRECTION TO GO! WE SHOULD BE AT 1%, OR BETTER!
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.
It’s quite an interesting meeting since the Fed doesn’t have to hike. They could just leave rates where they are and let the long end blow out more to do the job for them.
Despite the doomers assuring us that AI would go on and kill software this year, software has performed extremely well ever since putting on this basket back in March.
To the point you have the software vs semis trade having one of its best days on record on Monday.
The most expensive misread in markets right here is thinking AI kills software. I think it gets absorbed by it which is a completely different trade.
Spent several weeks on this post and built a 15 name basket around the idea.
Anyway… where was I.
Well we don’t really need a hike, but we are going to get one. As I wrote in the tweet last night, perhaps it will be a one and done kind of thing.
10s are nearly 3sd below their 1yr mean, positioning is extremely light, and everyone suddenly seems convinced yields only go one way.
Theres plenty of reason to start liking the other side