Abstract - Semtech (SMTC) Initiated Buy on 1.6T and NPO
• Initiates with Buy, $180 PT (25x FY28E P/E).
• Transitioning from an analog chip company to an AI interconnect beneficiary w portfolio spanning ACC, TIA, drivers, lasers and NPO analog solutions.
• Guides FY27 AI revenue >$350M; we forecast $466M (FY27E) → $1.22B (FY28E), driven by 1.6T.
• Google TPU expansion to be a key catalyst for CopperEdge ACC.
• NPO adoption could be the next major growth leg beyond 2027 as DSP removal increases analog content.
• Believes NVIDIA and leading CSPs are evaluating NPO deployments.
• NPO market size : we forecast 38M NPO optical engines in 2028, suggesting a multi-billion-dollar TIA/driver TAM
• Acquisition of HieFo strengthens its laser portfolio and expands optical content opportunities.
#
AI# #
Semiconductors# #
OpticalNetworking# #
SMTC#
Show more
Is it just me, or is the list of 3 letter optical jargon never ending?
We have LPO, LRO, NPO, XPO, CPO, OBO, and others for approaches.
Then InP, EML, ELS, OCS, SOI, and others to add to the random terms.
Even the industry events with OCP or OFC get their three letter names.
People who have followed me on my optical bottleneck scavenger hunt with $SOI or $IQE might know a lot by now.
But wouldn’t new followers might be super confused…
Show more
Abstract of SMIC and LITE Earnings Notes
SMCI — Raised TP to $54. Strong F4Q26 GM beat (17.6%) + higher FY27 guide ($65-72bn). Margin pop mostly transitory (mix/delays), but structural 10%+ GM target + $60bn backlog + no more dilution = improved outlook. Still key SpaceX share + broader client base (9 >bn clients).
LITE — TP $961. Results inline, F1Q27 guide modest beat (~24% QoQ growth). EML sold out through 2028 (hyperscalers + NVDA). 1.6T + CPO/NPO/OCS driving multi-year growth + margin expansion. Supply tightness remains a tailwind. As said, Key is Mkt doesn’t have scale-up CPO expectations.
#
SMCI# #
LITE#
Show more
So this is just what I'm seeing with $SIVE and the CW DFB laser chokepoint right now.
From optical earnings:
1. $LITE: unexpected demand and imbalance for UHP CW lasers.
- Had ability to price up ASP for lasers.
- Scale up CPO on track for H2 2027 shipments, called out any CPO scale up delay rumors as noise.
Lumentum confirmed timelines (that CPO players like Sivers sold off of misleading reports from), high margins, and extreme demand for qualified CW lasers.
2. $AAOI: doesn’t have enough CW laser capacity because of too much optical transceiver demand.
- Not meaningfully participating in first-gen CPO deployments, with $MTSI not looking like they're in it either but focusing on NPO. Haven't seen much with $SMTC after their HieFo acqusition.
- Called lasers as the bottleneck within a 20-40% demand imbalance for transceivers.
- Says customers approaching them every week asking them for supply + to move faster.
AOI confirmed demand imbalances + bottlenecks for lasers. And we got an even smaller pool for first-gen CPO players.
3. Both $AAOI and $LITE claimed Chinese players were years behind for CPO lasers and far behind stated claims in qualified capacity.
- $AAOI said 2-3 years+ behind with CPO lasers.
- $LITE said they haven't seen anything like Chinese claims in terms of outputs (and no recourse if it's false).
Reaffirms moat for CPO related lasers, and no flooding from some shortseller claims on the optical sector.
4. $MTSI said that many customers are approaching them with urgency due to the general supply shortage of indium phosphide DFB lasers.
Again, puts Sivers in the that bottleneck, giving them likely more customer demand .
Among $COHR ($72.54B), $LITE ($66.57B), $AVGO ($2.13T):
It's very special you get one of the public 4 Western CPO leaders at a ~$1.5B MC with $SIVE.
Feels like my thesis with both:
- The CW bottleneck that I predicted
- CW laser chokepoint (where there's only a few CPO players, at least for gen-1)
Got validated from earnings, now it's just waiting for the inflection points of next optical architecture shifts.
Show more
$LITE earnings are out, very strong earnings:
Revenue: $1.01B, +24.5% Q/Q, +109.3% Y/Y growth
vs. ~$984.6M
Adj. EPS: $3.23 vs. ~$2.95
Gross Margin (non-gaap): 50.4% / Operating margin (non-gaap) 36.6%
Q1 FY2027 guidance is probably more important:
Revenue: $1.225–1.275B vs. ~$1.16B
Adj. EPS: $4.05–4.35 vs. ~$3.63
Operating margin (non-gaap) of 39.5% - 40.5%
In terms of notes:
Sees: "Increasing demand for ultra-high-power CPO lasers, an initial order for ELS modules"
- Great read through on other CPO players like $SIVEF, $COHR, and others. (maybe not AAOI since they're missing out on first-gen deployments)
- "Breath of NPO engagements are the first signs that optics are starting to penetrate in-rack connectivity, significantly upping our optical TAM"
- Revenue projections "reaching our target model more than a quarter ahead of schedule."
Extremely strong earnings as expected, you have revenue going from:
$808M -> $1.01B -> $1.25B while operating margin keeps increasing... Just my first impressions.
Most important thing is the earnings call coming up soon.
Show more
Just putting it out there for people that think AAOI is a one year cycle...
$AAOI projects their ELSFP capacity for CPO to be 400K/units a month in 2028.
400k * ~$400 ELS ASP (GS assumptions) = + another ~$1.92B 2028 annualized revenue capacity added as a new distinct (>50% gross margin) product line.
On top of their existing 2027 projections (eg. ~$5.6B annualized transceiver revenue off $471m/month entering H2).
TAM for 1.6T also goes brrr so I'd expect their end of H2 2027 projections to go up as more capacity comes online...
For certain optical names, it's one cycle (eg. 1.6T, CPO scale out/up, NPO etc. ), stacked on top of one another... stacked on top of another... with TAM + margins stacking like minions after Anivia uses W in line.
Rather than one-and-done off of one year.
This is a stark contrast to some other sectors where growth is likely to decelerate after maybe 1 year of triple digit Y/Y revenue growth.
Show more
Wow, there's gem after gem in $AAOI earnings for $SIVE + other laser player readthrough.
1. AAOI not meaningfully participating in CPO first-gen deployments.
"We just can’t make enough of them [CPO lasers] to be involved in their current first-generation [CPO] deployments because there’s just not enough capacity. We have to prioritize our ability to make lasers for our own transceivers first"
So first-gen CPO laser deployments, might even be narrowed down further for Western players like $SIVE, $LITE, $AVGO, and $COHR.
And independent CPO CW laser capacity became more valuable if $AAOI had to turn away more customers...
Also remember Trendforce was talking about $AMD singing CW LTAs? $COHR / $LITE have capacity signed with $NVDA ...
I thought it would be $AAOI, but they might be out of the equation. $MTSI also doesn't look meaningful with early CPO participation (eg. no mention in ER aside from NPO, and removal from Ayar website).
So I wonder who players like $AMD is going to go with for Helios (eg. Sivers + Ayar more likely candidate now)?
Btw, this is not bearish AAOI because they have too much demand for optical transceiver business. Just more bullish on the existing few qualified CPO laser names that have capacity.
2. Demand imbalance and bottleneck for InP lasers / optical transceivers.
AOI's CEO stated kinda supported that when they said: "The customer demand is 20%-40% higher" than expanded built out capacity.
"We are getting this kind of demand from several big customers almost every week. Lasers are the biggest bottleneck right now for the transceiver business"
3. China being years away from having CPO DWDM specification lasers.
I covered this earlier when looking at CPO competition from channel checks.
But AAOI confirming that China is "easily at least two, three years or even longer from having CPO lasers is incredible tread through on defensibility Western laser positioning in the CPO laser chokepoint.
TLDR:
- High demand imbalance for CW lasers and optical transceivers.
- $AAOI not in first-gen CPO due to capacity constraints (not exactly bearish AAOI because they have too much demand for their optical transciver business, but even better news for the few independent players with capacity coming online like $SIVE)
- China years behind in CPO lasers.
Show more
Earnings Takeaways- Tower Semiconductor (TSEM)
• 2Q26 revenue $460mn (+24% YoY), GP +72%, OP +125%; EPS $0.79 a beat, driven by higher utilization, better mix & accelerating silicon photonics demand
• 3Q26 guide: record $520mn (+31% YoY, +13% QoQ) suggests a strong growth
• The co targets sequential revenue & profit improvement through 2026
• Raised 2026/27 EPS to $4.5 / $10; Maintain Buy, TP $260 (26x 2027E)
• $1.3bn contract SiPho revenue locked for 2027 from hyperscalers
• 2028 wafer order commitments expected to exceed 2027 levels
• Additional new SiPho customer qualifications underway
• Leading specialty foundry for NPO (near-package optics); CPO longer-term
• Capacity ramp focused on Japan Fab 7; NPO volume ramp expected 2H27
#
TSEM# #
Towersemi#
Show more
Regarding $AMZN RNG + OpenAI’s MRC and VCSELs.
In what appears to be an indirect response on B. Riley's $AAOI sell report regarding optimizations that "flattens networks and cuts transceiver TAM 40-50%".
Rosenblatt TLDR: They've already modeled for this, even though each XPU may use fewer transceivers.
The number of XPUs is growing so quickly that total optical demand should still rise.
On lasers architectures for CPO: VCSELs are useful as a credible bridge for NPO/short reach.
Ideal architecture though for CPO is UHP CW over other lasers, and cites Broadcom for that statements. Which happens to supports my core $SIVE thesis.
I feel like Rosenblatt and I share the same views on a lot of things, I like the way they roll.
Show more
Fun new information discovery from Poet OSINT community:
Seems likely that $POET / $SIVE are going to power a Top-3 hyperscaler (either Amazon, Microsoft, Google).
Given a Linkedin update from Ankur Singla (CEO of Lumilens).
Who stated their customer is one of the top 3 hyperscalers with their post focusing on CPO/NPO.
With that clue, seems more likely the Sivers CW DFB light source path over other EML suppliers given it's CPO Scale Out/NPO.
If you don't remember, Sivers is the laser supplier to Poet. And Poet has purchase agreements with Lumilens.
Always fun to find major potential breadcrumbs in the wild before they're officially confirmed. (Disclosure, long Sive)
Show more